If those are yours..IS..they look good..why do you spend your time in a VS. match with the damn feedertubes?If people wanna use em...its ok..if people dont wanna use em its ok too just more work without em.Simple as that.
Just grow and have a good time on here there are great people that are willing to do anything to help people grow their medicine or whatever the fuck they wanna do with it on here.So just grow and be cool man
Well, I have repeatedly said I think everyone should try it both ways. By the way mine are 21 days from seed not from sprout, but no matter. I wouldn't expect them to be as big as roseman's what with him being god and all. Really, I'm sure he knows more about plants than I do and I'm sure I do things that don't lead to max growth. But I don't believe it is a function of early feeding and still maintain that if the medium is where you want it on a wet/dry scale, it doesn't matter how it got there.If those are yours..IS..they look good..why do you spend your time in a VS. match with the damn feedertubes?If people wanna use em...its ok..if people dont wanna use em its ok too just more work without em.Simple as that.
Just grow and have a good time on here there are great people that are willing to do anything to help people grow their medicine or whatever the fuck they wanna do with it on here.So just grow and be cool man
And I keep hearing from people who are doing what I'm doing who say they have been doing it that way for years. You didn't think I invented it myself do you? I was schooled on how to get rid of the tubes by some of (I believe) the most accomplished dwc growers on riu. But they don't want to participate in a debate.
I appreciate your comments. Especially because it has to be hard being civil to me after how uncivil I admittedly have been to you. + rep.
There would still be dozens of variables with more impact than the non-difference between DWC and whichever of 5 or 6 systems you care to call bubbleponics. Not the least of which would be intentional bias in the design and conduct of the experiment. The real analytic question is: if the rockwool in two systems is being kept identically wet (through whatever means), to what could any measured difference between them be attributed?
Theres more O2 in the water being delivered to the roots.
There is no possible explanation for why that would be true. I'll guess you mean the pockets of air that travel up the feeder tubes that spit water against the sides of the cube. But as soon as those air pockets (bubbles if you wish) leave the tube they immediately dissipate into the...uh... air which already surrounds the cube. Air to roots is never an issue or problem when they are literally hanging in air.Theres more O2 in the water being delivered to the roots.
How was that well said??
mine sit in water with bubbles..you grow in the air?There is no possible explanation for why that would be true. I'll guess you mean the pockets of air that travel up the feeder tubes that spit water against the sides of the cube. But as soon as those air pockets (bubbles if you wish) leave the tube they immediately dissipate into the...uh... air which already surrounds the cube. Air to roots is never an issue or problem when they are literally hanging in air.
Thats exactly the point..man its basically an auto feeder.dont have to do it by hand..you can leave it just change the res water.
