Rootmaker yet another Gizmo to improving ur roots

Cold$moke

Well-Known Member
Pot is like any other plant and i cut through a lot of the bs quite quickly. I have major gripes with a lot of the stuff here and if i can grow with basic shop bought soil and one simple fertilizer so can we all.

I get what your saying though and refreshingly i support what your saying but theres plenty others around who dont overcomplicate it.

So in other words if pot is like any other plant it may just do like the Dr's test and increase root growth and speed =more fruit?:lol:
 

Kingrow1

Well-Known Member
So in other words if pot is like any other plant it may just do like the Dr's test and increase root growth and speed =more fruit?:lol:
Not literally, each plant has its own uniqueness, some lettuce seeds need light or they suffer low germination percentages.

If peeps think they can grow better seedlings than me in root trainers then bring it on, roots produce their own stims, extras arent needed.

I am too long here to get to technical with you, do my seedlings look like they need root trainers...?

Grab any plastic bottle and cut it in half, turn the top end upsidown and slot it into the bottom half, voila instant root trainer, roots hit the open cap end and air prune themselves.
 

Cold$moke

Well-Known Member
I was poking at you to get a rise is all

:lol:

Im done arguing in this thread just messin with ya.
Cause i knew which way it would go , ;)
 

Dr. Who

Well-Known Member
right, because pot is very hard to grow and ordinary plant scientists know nothing
WRONG!
Because the "bro" Scientist has actually grown CANNABIS for over 40 years and not some Dr. "blow hard" who is speaking on non cannabis growing.
Is the guy wrong?
NO but, there is a definable difference!
I - as a choice by actual use of the product - don't like them. This is opinion by result of experimentation. Try them and form your own opinion.

Like Coldsmoke said. Don't go down this road.
 

Dr. Who

Well-Known Member
RD spreads too much hyped info, has to be said....
What he's doing by waiting. Is to boost the roots at that time to max the nutrient available to the plant from the soil in that container, by getting the roots to fill that container at the time the plant needs the max amount of available nutrient......Thus the soil begins to run down on available nutrition as the plant reduces need. This continues as the plant nears the finish....to optimize the cannabiniod content properly.
 

jonsnow399

Well-Known Member
WRONG!
Because the "bro" Scientist has actually grown CANNABIS for over 40 years and not some Dr. "blow hard" who is speaking on non cannabis growing.
Is the guy wrong?
NO but, there is a definable difference!
I - as a choice by actual use of the product - don't like them. This is opinion by result of experimentation. Try them and form your own opinion.

Like Coldsmoke said. Don't go down this road.
I, by choice by actual use of the product - like them. Already been using them for years. I would bet on Dr. Blowhard vs
Bro "scientist anyday
 

Cold$moke

Well-Known Member
I, by choice by actual use of the product - like them. Already been using them for years. I would bet on Dr. Blowhard vs
Bro "scientist anyday
Agree

but im open to learn from every body too.
I simply want my questions to have answers that pertain to my questions lmao


Peace to the real doctors and the brointists
 

Kingrow1

Well-Known Member
I, by choice by actual use of the product - like them. Already been using them for years. I would bet on Dr. Blowhard vs
Bro "scientist anyday
Like no one is disputing their efficiency of rooting through more soil. Great for moms to give you less rootbound problems....

But if you think your out growing those with well structured soil in larger pots then think again.

:-)
 

Kingrow1

Well-Known Member
The whole freaking thread just waiting for one of you root gizmos to actually prove somthing too, my seedlings, crap soil and pots have been proved many times over and i have qualifications in science with dank university brologists....
 

Cold$moke

Well-Known Member
Well if your waiting for my results they will have to wait till harvest time.

But as a side not the root pruning on the clone has been putting on root mass in a big way .
With all lateral roots trying to become new tap roots
 

Kingrow1

Well-Known Member
A plant ill only grow enough roots as to meet its needs, proof is lame, takes me two weeks to prove i can grow a plant as big as those in rootmakers at two weeks :-)
 

Cold$moke

Well-Known Member
Like no one is disputing their efficiency of rooting through more soil. Great for moms to give you less rootbound problems....

But if you think your out growing those with well structured soil in larger pots then think again.

:-)

But if you take your self for example a master of seedlings. ..

And YOU. Did a side by side doing it your normal way and the way of using the root pruning..


Then YOU PLANT IN THE SAME SIZE POT
And see which is better..

You have a nack for going around what is being said. Somtimes :)
 

Cold$moke

Well-Known Member
A plant ill only grow enough roots as to meet its needs, proof is lame, takes me two weeks to prove i can grow a plant as big as those in rootmakers at two weeks :-)
Again THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE END RESULT

IM SORRY BUT IT DOESNT ..

Did you ever whatch the lecture?

Edit.im not yelling but you have that knack for not stating anything that pertains.

Because you say a grower can do better in. A BIGGER POT, WELL DUH!!

You have to go side by side with the end pot size the same i hope you understand
 

Cold$moke

Well-Known Member
The most un biased
Way to test would be to
Plant both seeds in the same soil at the same time.
One in a root maker the other in your standard pot.

Then when ever the standard pot needs to be transplanted you would also transplant the rootmaker..

And to see if it works you would have to plant them both in a pot size that would never be filled in time 10 gal plus.

This would show which one grew bigger and yeilds more in a UN BIASED way
 
Top