Capitalism 2.0 Will Include a Healthy Dose of Socialism

Roger A. Shrubber

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
i don't want to go back and find all the articles, but about 6 months ago there was another Bernie argument, and i went and found several articles about Bernie's voting record, and his business dealings....he's not nearly as liberal as he seems, and many minority groups, women's groups, and lgbt...w/e groups won't have anything to do with him, because he's made a career out of ignoring them and their issues...
he tends to vote very democratic, till it has to do with the district he represents, or his own financial holdings, then he has no problem voting against the democrats....so like all politicians, he talks to the press out of one side of his mouth....and to his "partners" from the other side....
 
Roger A. Shrubber

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
didn't i just say i didn't want to dig through all that shit again?..............................fuck.......sometime today, after i do everything else i have to do...............i'll do your research for you.......again............
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Asking you to cite an example of the claim you just made is not doing research for me. It's validating the claim you made with proof/evidence
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
Do you even listen to yourself?

Do you think before you open your mouth?

How in the fuck can you defend a system where 40% of Americans are living in poverty and a tiny few are outlandishly rich- yet pay nothing back to our society?

You AREN'T thinking at all; you've swallowed the neoliberal line of bullshit hook, line and sinker.
Click to expand...
everything is a conspiracy to you.

You don't even know what the word neoliberal means.

Speaking of which, what do you mean by the word "progressive". The context of your posts indicate you don't know what real meaning of progress either..
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Roger A. Shrubber said:
because i don't think open revolt is the answer....but i don't know exactly what else to do. if i tell all the politicians in the country to gtfo...they won't.....if i tell them to quit taking bribes from big busineses....they won't.....so just exactly what am i supposed to do tty?
you keep telling all of us what's wrong...but i've yet to hear how you intend to fix it....by not voting? we all know there is shit very very wrong....we might not all agree on the exact nature of those problems, but pretty much everyone agrees that problems do indeed exist....what i'm looking for is viable alternatives....and i'm not finding many.....fuck, i'm not finding any......
Click to expand...
Nonviolent revolt is the only option left; the FBI is on record as being actively involved in the undermining and discrediting of liberal movements from MLK's civil Rights movement to Occupy Wall Street.

The Supreme Court is packed with Federalist Society alumni.

Congress, the Senate and the Presidency are all chosen by the high bidder.

Corporate America and the ultra wealthy get their way most of the time; they're the new feudal Lords of our American aristocracy.

So if not nonviolent civil disobedience, exactly what do you suggest?

A note in the comments box?
 
Last edited:
Unclebaldrick

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
Nonviolent revolt is the only option left; the FBI is on record as being actively involved in the undermining and discrediting of liberal movements from MLK's civil Rights movement to Occupy Wall Street.

The Supreme Court is packed with Federalist Society alumni.

Congress, the Senate and the Presidency are all chosen by the high bidder.

Corporate America and the ultra wealthy get their way most of the time; they're the new feudal Lords of our American aristocracy.

So if not no violent revolt, exactly what do you suggest?

A note in the comments box?
Click to expand...
So fucking revolt already. Do it.

Or are you just a spittle-soaked loner staying up until the wee hours raging on the internet?
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Roger A. Shrubber said:
didn't i just say i didn't want to dig through all that shit again?..............................fuck.......sometime today, after i do everything else i have to do...............i'll do your research for you.......again............
Click to expand...
You made the claim, you support it.
 
Roger A. Shrubber

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
Nonviolent revolt is the only option left; the FBI is on record as being actively involved in the undermining and discrediting of liberal movements from MLK's civil Rights movement to Occupy Wall Street.

The Supreme Court is packed with Federalist Society alumni.

Congress, the Senate and the Presidency are all chosen by the high bidder.

Corporate America and the ultra wealthy get their way most of the time; they're the new feudal Lords of our American aristocracy.

So if not nonviolent civil disobedience, exactly what do you suggest?

A note in the comments box?
Click to expand...
non violent revolt is bullshit....they have the national guard and the army....and they'll fucking use them.....if you aren't armed and ready to do fucking violence to get your goals....that's not revolt...it's more fucking running your mouth..................don't stand on a soapbox shouting and tell me you're staging a revolt.....
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Roger A. Shrubber said:
non violent revolt is bullshit....they have the national guard and the army....and they'll fucking use them.....if you aren't armed and ready to do fucking violence to get your goals....that's not revolt...it's more fucking running your mouth..................don't stand on a soapbox shouting and tell me you're staging a revolt.....
Click to expand...
Dr Martin Luther King, Jr and Ghandi both practiced and animated nonviolent civil disobedience. Yes, much violence was directed at them but that ended up working in their favor.

There is no armed revolt option; they have far more firepower and it's the wrong tactic in any case.
 
Unclebaldrick

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
What does this have to do with the thread topic?

Oh yeah, nothing- because you can't have an honest debate.
Click to expand...
Well, I have asked you in that particular thread many times but you won't answer.

Because you are a coward who accuses people of that which you are guilty more or less constantly.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
Yet more personal attacks. But you call others cowardly.
Click to expand...
% of votes as Senator to support crucial progressive causes:

Kamala Harris (99.6%) > Bernie Sanders (96.1%) >> Michael Bennet (74.9%)

People tty says are not "progressive": Harris, Bennet

wtf does he mean by that word?
 
Last edited:
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Roger A. Shrubber said:
didn't i just say i didn't want to dig through all that shit again?..............................fuck.......sometime today, after i do everything else i have to do...............i'll do your research for you.......again............
Click to expand...
Where's the proof of your initial claim, there, champ? Did ya find it yet?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top