Was Thinking What Country Will USA Invade Next?
- Thread starter DrFever
- Start date
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
perhaps a joint instead of a cigar?yea mongolia was a once great powerfull nation maybe obama could walk into the UN with a cigar in his mouth and say HEY yo see that we kicked there ass)
he can't do a blunt for the same reason he can't display much anger....
sync0s
Well-Known Member
They already did by selling them guns to the cartels
beardo
Well-Known Member
syria then iran
newatit2010
Well-Known Member
It don't matter the puppets will blame Bush. Libia Syria all Bushes fault.
Luger187
Well-Known Member
id say syria. i really wish we would do something about N korea. the shit that goes on there is unbelievable, but nobody ever really talks about them because the country doesnt do much with the outside world. we could take them out pretty easily. S korea is our ally, so if we had that border with the north and navy destroyers around the country, we would win. if we wait too long to do this, we will have to deal with a serious nuclear threat, because iran gives them shit. however, i would try to wait until kim jong il dies, and his son takes over. his son is probably too inexperienced to win a war against us.
Some country does stuff that we don't like, but doesn't harm us in any way. That doesn't seem to justify wholesale murder to me though.
We really shouldn't go around just starting wars because we don't like how some other sovereign nation does things. I mean i don't necessarily enjoy it when I see children calling each other names or having little fist fights over candy or who called who's mom a whore, but I don't go up and start filling their little bodies full of lead from my AK you know? Normally I try defusing the situation first before I start shooting.
Luger187
Well-Known Member
good luck defusing the situation in N korea. most of the people in that country believe he is a literal god. im sure a good amount are faking it to survive though. babies are born way smaller than they should be because nobody has food. if you do ANYTHING wrong, or talk bad about kim, you and your family go to a labor camp. personally, i dont think we should stand by while that shit happens. sure, it will cost money. but you cant put a dollar amount on human suffering. the people in his country dont even know how the rest of the world lives. they are brainwashed constantly. i dont think they have the ability to realize what is going on and in turn stand up for themselves.
however, i would say that now would be a bad time for doing that because of the recession and all the other wars we have going on.
Dan Kone
Well-Known Member
If we invaded Pakistan, we'd lose. A war vs Russia or China would have a better outcome. Pakistan has been in a state of preparation for war vs India for a generation. They are ready for a fight.
Imagine the war in Afghanistan except they had a legitimate well funded and supplied army in addition to their network of guerrilla fighters. And those fighters had decent air support, radar, and the ability to defend against air strikes. Oh and also nukes. It would not be a good idea to fight them.
Our next war will be in Yeman (if we aren't at war with them already) and possibly Syria.
Luger187
Well-Known Member
what if when we started the war in afghanistan, we worked together with india to take over pakistan? then we wouldnt have to deal with all of pakistans bullshit. just a thought
People are starving in Somalia, lets bomb them well fed!! You do realize that when you go to war with a country you aren't going to war with its government, you go to war with its people. If you think the N Korean people are bad off now, wait until they have death falling from the sky!!
bigbillyrocka
Well-Known Member
We just need to let them deal with their own problems. Just like feeding other countries when our own has plenty of homeless families. Save us a ton of money.
Dan Kone
Well-Known Member
India would refuse because it would be guaranteed they get nuked. We'd win that war though. India's entire military is designed for a war vs Pakistan. It would still be a long hard war that would take +15 years to win. We'd dominate their army, but have a nasty insurgency/mujahidin problem. Those guys are used to insurgent fighting against superior forces.
DrFever
New Member
i think really USA is scared shitless about North korea just look last time they were there they got chased out by civilians with pitchforks and also being a comunist country having ties to russia and china <--- usa number 1 lender
its touchy grounds also i might add North korea has warned usa that they have nuclear weapons and will use it on them so usa is at a stale mate
DrFever
New Member
dan i beg to differ like us's superior force against vietnamese ???? who one that war anyways ???? pakistan , and india have Nukes as well and also there was a time when having carriers ment you could take a war to a country but things have changed big time since for instance american patriot missile Failure might of hit 1 out of 10 scuds in reality really was a embarressment to usa
Russia has 17,900 nukes usa has only 7900 nukes ok russia couldnt compete with americans building ship for ship so they decided instead of lets get into the cruise missiles and let me tell you M8 the brahmos cruise missile which india / pakistan and other countrys have via russia selling is far superior then any usa build cruise missile i mean dead bullseye hits at over mach 3
so now usa is limeited to ocean space being they cant stop them by the time a ship caught it its to late
) and also i might add theres no plans to combat this situation for another 10 yrs being usa has no money 2