Was Thinking What Country Will USA Invade Next?

sync0s

sync0s

Well-Known Member
DrFever said:
you know peeps thats why JFK was assaninated cause prior to his presidency usa made money fighting wars start a war an our factorys are up and running :P)) jfk realized this isnt goin to make usa and what he got shot
Dan thinks that sending bunch of 18 yr old kids to war is superior dan let me tell you usa is looking to get there ass kicked ffs pick a fight with china n see how you get handled

usa has never fought a war on there own EVER google it
Click to expand...
Civil War, Spanish-American War, Mexican-American War. Seriously..
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
I did, Marine Corps. Got me some combat exp in Somalia.
Click to expand...
yup and you are a credit to my point of those of us who have seen war or combat are not to quick to just say who we should invade next...you can't just cut off war when you losing like a video game and you sure as hell dont get an extra man to play when you or your buddy die...
 
Dan Kone

Dan Kone

Well-Known Member
DrFever said:
Dan cmon think about it for a second ok are you winning the war In IraQ hahahaa actually thats antoher waste of tax payors money you lost that war 2 as for world war 2 omfngod americans stood by as there allies got tumbled france was tooken over must i add usa stood by :)) what i find so fckin halarious is usa didnt land nott no one troop in europe until russia and england had germany on the run
its said fact if germany took it to usa you be speaking german today only reason you went to war is when japan attacked pearl harbour churchhill litterally begged usa for help and even stalin as they were getting there ass kicked
but it was election year huh lmaooooooooooo just remember at that time russia and usa were allies and you fckt them 2 pretty sad really when you suppose to have a allie and they stand there watchin you get your ass kicked just go look at your statue of liberty :))
Click to expand...
Sorry, I know that's supposedly English, but I don't hablo.
 
Dan Kone

Dan Kone

Well-Known Member
DrFever said:
Dan thinks that sending bunch of 18 yr old kids to war is superior
Click to expand...
wtf? I've said exactly the opposite of that many times. I'll say it again, every war we've fought since ww2 has been a huge mistake. The military should be used for defense only.

dan let me tell you usa is looking to get there ass kicked ffs pick a fight with china n see how you get handled
Click to expand...
ummm, no. The US would annihilate any traditional army in the world quite easily. As it's been proven, the only thing that is effective vs the US army is guerrilla hit and run tactics. Stick around for a fight, and the US will win.

usa has never fought a war on there own EVER google it
Click to expand...
For political reasons, yes.
 
beardo

beardo

Well-Known Member
Dan Kone said:
The US would annihilate any traditional army in the world quite easily. As it's been proven, the only thing that is effective vs the US army is guerrilla hit and run tactics. Stick around for a fight, and the US will win.
Click to expand...
Why haven't we won the korean war yet?
 
tryingtogrow89

tryingtogrow89

Well-Known Member
beardo said:
Shit were bombing Somalia now to? Again?
Click to expand...
Indeed, so lets count. Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Somalia, Libya, Yemen, and im sure Syria is is in the mix, if we have not secretly started bombing Syria already , we will.
So lets call 7 countries, we have military action tied into 7 GODDAMN countries. At what point are we to call it WW3, if without calling it that now?
 
beardo

beardo

Well-Known Member
tryingtogrow89 said:
Indeed, so lets count. Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Somalia, Libya, Yemen, and im sure Syria is is in the mix, if we have not secretly started bombing Syria already , we will.
So lets call 7 countries, we have military action tied into 7 GODDAMN countries. At what point are we to call it WW3, if without calling it that now?
Click to expand...
What the fuck happened with Libya? I know we had a long running problem with Gadaffi but I thought that had blown over then I wake up one day and were threatening him to give up his country and blowing up his country and his family? what the fuck happened and why doesn't any one really care? were talking about cutting old peoples Social security payments but not why were starting more wars?
 
tryingtogrow89

tryingtogrow89

Well-Known Member
beardo said:
What the fuck happened with Libya? I know we had a long running problem with Gadaffi but I thought that had blown over then I wake up one day and were threatening him to give up his country and blowing up his country and his family? what the fuck happened and why doesn't any one really care? were talking about cutting old peoples Social security payments but not why were starting more wars?
Click to expand...
The people in Lybia actually like Gadaffi, he was able to pull that country around and modernize and enrich their culture into a thriving economy.
"The rebels" are actually al-CIA-duh, creating the problem, NATO Reacting, and "kinetic military action" bombings set forth as support for the rebels. To make things even more totalitarian we are giving support to rebels who are al qaeda or more appropriately Al-CIA-duh. This is because the militia is ran and operated by CIA. The mainstream news reports on fighting al qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan, then while they report that, they admit that on the other hand we are also backing them up in LIbya WTF?
With Gadaffi only tear gassing and bean bagging the rebels(al-CIA-duh) Obama said the rebels need our conglomerate support of NATO, with out congressional approval of course.:wall: But hey, the police tear gas us, and bean bag us also, where the hell is our NATO invasion to support us and arm us to rise up?:roll:
 
DrFever

DrFever

New Member
tryingtogrow89 said:
The people in Lybia actually like Gadaffi, he was able to pull that country around and modernize and enrich their culture into a thriving economy.
"The rebels" are actually al-CIA-duh, creating the problem, NATO Reacting, and "kinetic military action" bombings set forth as support for the rebels. To make things even more totalitarian we are giving support to rebels who are al qaeda or more appropriately Al-CIA-duh. This is because the militia is ran and operated by CIA. The mainstream news reports on fighting al qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan, then while they report that, they admit that on the other hand we are also backing them up in LIbya WTF?
With Gadaffi only tear gassing and bean bagging the rebels(al-CIA-duh) Obama said the rebels need our conglomerate support of NATO, with out congressional approval of course.:wall: But hey, the police tear gas us, and bean bag us also, where the hell is our NATO invasion to support us and arm us to rise up?:roll:
Click to expand...
why there really there is it falls back on the american dollar libya suplies there oil but Gadaffi is a smart cookie and decided to change the currency to the euro meaning again the american dollar becomes a problem usa needs there dollar to be above all
so in my guess if usa is to get this rich oil from lybia, which makes the best fuels and diesels coming from libya then they got to convert american dollars to euro to pay for it?? and way exchange rate is thats bad for usa from what i am takin of this all
 
tryingtogrow89

tryingtogrow89

Well-Known Member
DrFever said:
why there really there is it falls back on the american dollar libya suplies there oil but Gadaffi is a smart cookie and decided to change the currency to the euro meaning again the american dollar becomes a problem usa needs there dollar to be above all
so in my guess if usa is to get this rich oil from lybia, which makes the best fuels and diesels coming from libya then they got to convert american dollars to euro to pay for it?? and way exchange rate is thats bad for usa from what i am takin of this all
Click to expand...
They only supply less than 1% of the worlds oil so its not really for oil.
We get most our supplies from saudi arabia, america and other 1st world countries could not tolerate a new competing currency, and definitely not tolerate a new competing currency from a 3rd world country. That is why they are taking down africa/libya, this whole mess over there is referred to as operation africon.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top