CaptnJack
Active Member
well stoney, in the areas i misunderstood what you were sayin, i apologise, how ever for you to say that there was no jesus, is still just as illogical, because so far, everything that science supports can fall into the same thing, the skulls as i have posted on above, how can they say they were our ancestors, what evidence do they truly have? i mean do they have a frozen body of a cromagnum? how do they know it was a species of monkey that just died off? seeing as how there has been thousands of species that have died off, but what makes them homo? what evidence? if they had a preserved body, i'd retract my statement, but they dont as far as i know, theory of evolution is just that a theory, the question of the existence of jesus, if we talking logical, as a man named jesus, His Jewish opponents had the most to gain by denying Jesus’ existence. But the evidence points in the opposite direction. Several Jewish writings also tell of His flesh-and-blood existence. Both Gemaras of the Jewish Talmud refer to Jesus. Although these consist of only a few brief, bitter passages intended to discount Jesus’ deity, these very early Jewish writings don’t begin to hint that he was not a historical person,
And as for flavius, Flavius Josephus was a noted Jewish historian who began writing under Roman authority in a.d. 67. Josephus, who was born just a few years after Jesus died, would have been keenly aware of Jesus’ reputation among both Romans and Jews. In his famous Antiquities of the Jews (a.d. 93), Josephus wrote of Jesus as a real person. “At that time lived Jesus, a holy man, if man he may be called, for he performed wonderful works, and taught men, and joyfully received the truth. And he was followed by many Jews and many Greeks. He was the Messiah.”6 Although there is dispute about some of the wording in the account, especially the reference to Jesus being the Messiah (scholars are skeptical, thinking that Christians inserted this phrase), certainly Josephus confirmed his existence. The insertion of him being the MESSIAH is the tamperment which you're talking of, not the message. If you want historical proof watch the videos i've posted especially the first and the other parts to it.
And as for flavius, Flavius Josephus was a noted Jewish historian who began writing under Roman authority in a.d. 67. Josephus, who was born just a few years after Jesus died, would have been keenly aware of Jesus’ reputation among both Romans and Jews. In his famous Antiquities of the Jews (a.d. 93), Josephus wrote of Jesus as a real person. “At that time lived Jesus, a holy man, if man he may be called, for he performed wonderful works, and taught men, and joyfully received the truth. And he was followed by many Jews and many Greeks. He was the Messiah.”6 Although there is dispute about some of the wording in the account, especially the reference to Jesus being the Messiah (scholars are skeptical, thinking that Christians inserted this phrase), certainly Josephus confirmed his existence. The insertion of him being the MESSIAH is the tamperment which you're talking of, not the message. If you want historical proof watch the videos i've posted especially the first and the other parts to it.
your like a little chihuahua! lots of bark!! no bite I'm liking this
