FISA Abuse troll is a scam.

hanimmal

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
So the latest nonsense from @Bugeye:
Screen Shot 2019-12-08 at 10.59.12 AM.png
1st. Notice the dreamy convict Russian spy Maria Butina, scare tactics from Russia, and homophobic racist shit 'From our partners'. No weird ass psi-ops white noise there.

2nd. Dear leader is banking on 'acting unprofessionally' is somehow enough to con everyone in his cult into looking the other way long enough for him to get 4 more years if Russia and his American traitors like Brad Parscale praying on the vulnerable with their propaganda online.

Lastly and most important though, Trump hired crooks and Russian spies into his campaign to get every last bit of crooked money as possible from his presidential run as he could and got caught by winning due to the Russian military attacking our democracy. And no amount of smoke can take that away. Which is what the rest of the article was, trying to invent a conspiracy (like they did with Hillary Clinton) to attack Joe Biden, then have their trolls get everyone so worked up (in key districts due to Trump giving the Russians our voting data) so that people won't be able to talk about it, regardless of any actual truth to the story.

Screen Shot 2019-12-08 at 10.43.07 AM.png
Looking at the entire window you get to see this is just a anti-Biden Ad, with a link (the 3 million) that gets to the reality of the bullshit this is. I basically should have just stopped there after skimming the rest.

Screen Shot 2019-12-08 at 10.42.36 AM.png

It's all a Russian con with Guiliani in the middle of it all trying to get Trump and other Republicans re-elected.

One thing I was trying to figure out was who "Chulupa" is, basically turns out they are trying to use her as the American Butina, like she was somehow smuggling dirt for the DNC, or something like that it gets ridiculous trying to keep all their bullshit strait. But turns out already been fact checked by CNN:
Screen Shot 2019-12-08 at 10.47.06 AM.png

So basically this is the good old look backwards at when you were committing a crime, find anyone in Ukraine at the time that they can make up a story about and use them to try to create (un)reasonable doubt.
 
Unclebaldrick

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
Bugeye said:
As more fully described in Chapter Five, based upon the information known to t he FBI in October 2016, the first application contained the following seven significant inaccuracies and omissions: 1. Omitted information the FBI had obtained from another U.S. government agency detailing its prior relationship wit h Page, including that Page had been approved as an "operational contact" for the other agency from 2008 to 2013, and that Page had provided information to the other agency concerning his prior contacts with certain Russian intelligence officers, one of which overlapped w ith facts asserted in the FISA application; 2. Included a source characterization statement asserting that Steele's prior reporting had been "corroborated and used in criminal proceedings," Executive Summary Review of Four FISA Applications and Other Aspects of the FBI's Crossfire Hurricane Investigation which overstated the significance of Steele's past reporting and was not approved by Steele's handling agent, as req uired by the Woods Procedures; 3. Omitted information relevant to the reliability of Person 1, a key Steele sub-source (who was attributed with providing the information in Report 95 and some of the information in Reports 80 and 102 relied upon in the application), namely that (1) Steele himself told members of the Crossfire Hurricane team that Person 1 was a "boaster" and an "egoist" and "ma en a e in some embellishment" and (2) 4. Asserted that the FBI had assessed that Steele did not directly provide to the press information in the September 23 Yahoo News article based on the premise that Steele had told the FBI that he only shared his election-related research with the FBI and Fusion GPS, his client; this premise was incorrect and contradicted by documentation in the Woods File- Steele had told the FBI that he also gave his information to the State Department; 5. Omitted Papadopoulos's consensually monitored statements to an FBI CHS in September 2016 denying that anyone associated with the Trump campaign was collaborating with Russia or with outside groups like Wikileaks in the release of emails; 6. Omitted Page's consensually monitored statements to an FBI CHS in August 2016 that Page had "literally never met" or "said one word to" Paul Manafort and that Manafort had not responded to any of Page's emails; if true, those statements were in tension with claims in Report 95 that Page was participating in a conspiracy with Russia by acting as an intermediary for Manafort on behalf of the Trump campaign; and 7. I ncluded Page's consensually monitored statements to an FBI CHS in October 2016 that the FBI believed supported its theory that Page was an agent of Russia but omitted other statements Page made that were inconsistent with its theory, including denying having met with Sechin and Divyekin, or even knowing who Divyekin was; if true, those statements contradicted t he claims in Report 94 that Page ix had met secretly with Sechin and Divyekin about future cooperat ion with Russia and shared derogatory information about candidate Clinton.
Click to expand...
So much for admitting that the Horowitz Investigation didn't show shit. It's ok, we knew yo were lying all the time.
 
rkymtnman

rkymtnman

Well-Known Member
“Based on the evidence collected to date, and while our investigation is ongoing, last month we advised the Inspector General that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened,” U.S. Attorney John Durham said in a statement.

"We are also surprised that the Republican IG isn't on board with Mr Barrs and my conspiracy theory that the FBI used the Steele Dossier, instead of the loose lips of Mr Papadopashit, to start their investigation" US Attorney Durham added.
 
hanimmal

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Screen Shot 2019-12-09 at 3.03.42 PM.png

The highlighted part is interesting. So the FBI got the "Steele Dossier" in September, after they already had a FISA on Carter Page, and they then saw that some of the information in the Dossier was disinformation, meaning that they had more evidence due to that being in it.

And most important the second to last paragraph, there was no evidence of political bias on the FISA for Carter Page. So even if turns out that Barr can 6 degrees of Kevin Bacon Brennan to Page, it doesn't matter, due to that being how every other Pedophile is captured.
 
hanimmal

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
WASHINGTON (AP) — The FBI was justified in opening its investigation into ties between the Trump presidential campaign and Russia and did not act with political bias, the Justice Department’s internal watchdog declared Monday, undercutting President Donald Trump’s repeated claims that he has merely been the target of a “witch hunt.”

The long-awaited report rejected theories and criticism spread by Trump and his supporters, though it also found “serious performance failures” up the bureau’s chain of command that are likely to be cited by Republican allies as the president faces a probable impeachment vote this month.

It makes sense that a backwards looking investigation into how investigators put in the situation of having the Republican nominee for President of the United States is surrounding himself with Russian puppets at the same time the Russian military is hacking into the DNC, that would have to be aspects that could be done better as a historical benefit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top