I have a hard time wrapping my brain around the possibilities of the magnitude of money that might be getting spent in a Trump vs Bloomberg USPresidential race. I can’t help thinking about how all that money spent on trying to win a presidency could be used in a better
She voted for NAFTA. Bernie did not. Read this and and ask yourself if an American auto maker should be shipping jobs to other countries rather than giving up American jobs. Not only that ask someone who owns a Siverado crew cab made in Mexico? This was a bill crafted by Republicans.
www.motorbiscuit.com
Oh no! Not NAFTA! The horror.She voted for NAFTA. Bernie did not. Read this and and ask yourself if an American auto maker should be shipping jobs to other countries rather than giving up American jobs. Not only that ask someone who owns a Siverado crew cab made in Mexico? This was a bill crafted by Republicans.
Are Chevy Trucks Made in Mexico or America?
Pickup trucks may be closely tied to the image of ‘America’, but not every ‘American’ truck is made here. And, to be fair, the nature of automotive
Shit, I have been cultivating heat resistant coral strains for free for several years now.
My have you read Bloomberg's arrest record while Mayor? Now he feels sorry for all the innocent Blacks he imprisoned. He favors decriminalization but not willing to give up Schedule 1. That's exactly what Trump basically agreed to in a vague way. Let's hope we can make a better choice by voting! They still have to get votes.
The funny thing is I have seen this exact line of attack back when Trump was too scared to run against Kamala Harris because he knew he would get crushed by a black woman on stage.My have you read Bloomberg's arrest record while Mayor? Now he feels sorry for all the innocent Blacks he imprisoned. He favors decriminalization but not willing to give up Schedule 1. That's exactly what Trump basically agreed to in a vague way. Let's hope we can make a better choice by voting! They still have to get votes.
Look at this:
Yeah I enjoy smoking a lot, unfortunately I need to pass a upcoming screening so have been having to deal with trolls on this site without being able to enjoy it like I normally do since mid Dec. But what can you do, sometimes you need to suck it up.Look at this:
Doesn't look like he values people as equal to me. He still was elected Mayor no doubt. Do you even smoke weed? Maybe you don't worry about Johnny so much?Booklet of Mike Bloomberg’s 'Wit and Wisdom' could haunt him during presidential bid: Critics
The 32-page book of quotes was intended to be a light-hearted gift to celebrate the 48th birthday of the thriving company’s up-and-coming boss.abcnews.go.com
"Here we project both the economic and life-saving effects likely to be generated by the Medicare for All Act relative to the current American system. We find that the expected savings from a universal single-payer system would more than compensate for the increased expenditure associated with universal health-care coverage. Moreover, universal health care would save lives while simultaneously improving the quality and productivity of those lives, as detailed here. Specifically, we calculate that the Medicare for All Act would reduce national health-care expenditure by more than US$458 billion, corresponding to 13·1% of health-care expenditure in 2017. We also project that the Medicare for All Act would save more than 68500 lives every year, compared with the status quo. If the Affordable Care Act were to be repealed, we would expect an additional annual loss of more than 38,500 lives. Compared with health-care access before the Affordable Care Act, the legislation proposed by Senator Sanders, would save 107000 lives annually."
This is where I TL;DR'd you. There isn't anyone left still supporting the current mess. There is no need to increase federal spending by more than the current federal budget in order to achieve universal healthcare. An expansion of medicare to cover the 27 million uninsured Americans would be covered by repealing the Trump tax cuts to the ultra rich.
"the expected savings from a universal single-payer system would more than compensate for the increased expenditure associated with universal health-care coverage."
So you're just going to go in this circle again? Regurgitating talking points that have been rebutted and rejected until you lose the debate again...
Repeating right wing Heritage Foundation talking points don't make them true
Calling my argument a Heritage foundation talking point isn't an argument. Nor do I support the current system. I have cited only the most liberal of sources and rejected the Mercatus study which estimated the cost of Bernie's plan at 49 trillion dollars. The numbers I cited come straight from the Urban Institute study. In fact, I gave Bernie even more wiggle room than he deserves, because this study, conducted by the left leaning Urban Institute, excludes the 6.6 million immigrants currently in the US who Bernie wants to include, so his plan would cost even more than their comprehensive estimate of 34 trillion dollars.
mediabiasfactcheck.com
