The control of said property was lost when the aggressor entity (your nanny state) usurped the owners in the first place and removed a right they previously had, the right of control of their property.
wow, that's quite a racist way to describe things.
you are saying that the owners of stores had a right to cause harm to blacks with their racist policies?
no, no one has a right to cause harm with racist policies.
blacks fought, marched, were beaten, and died to end those racist, harmful, aggressively racist practices which you call "rights".
and you call the entity in charge of protecting citizens from harm an "aggressor" for ending the harmful, racist, and aggressive practices of the racists.
maybe try telling your interpretation (revision) of history to your klan chapter, they might scoop up your bigoted, racist language a little better.
wow.
If I go to your property and tell you, you can't paint your house green any longer, but if you'd like you have been "given" the option of painting it yellow, and these are your only options....are you still in control of your property dung meister?
the federal government did not mandate what color they must paint their buildings. the federal government simply told them they were not allowed to continue their racist, harmful, aggressive tactics while calling themselves open to the public.
they still have control of their property and can still decide who they may interact with, but they just have to call themselves a private club if they want to continue those harmful, racist, aggressive practices that you so adamantly defend.
The problem lies with you. You are such a boot licker
no, the problem lies with you.
you are a racist bigot.
you are a historical revisionist.
you think that racists have a right to cause harm to people based on their skin color.
you abuse the english language. the only rape that goes on here is with what you do to the language in your attempts to revise history so you can justify your racist, bigoted views.
you are probably a pedophile too.
