abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Jesus seemed like an Anarchist though, and probably would have rejected a government check as well. I kind of like his spirit.
Jesus seemed like an Anarchist though, and probably would have rejected a government check as well. I kind of like his spirit.
Jesus seemed like an Anarchist though, and probably would have rejected a government check as well. I kind of like his spirit.
Please explain which kinds of jobs government "creates" and how they impact other people, if you are able to, Mr. Economist.Robroy believes in Job Creators.
Are you agreeing that a coercive tax on property that houses people is wrong in the present day?job creation to me is when the ruling class decided to charge the peasants for the firewood they clear from their rulers land, which once was free.
jesus christ, RR..they must love you down at city hall.Are you agreeing that a coercive tax on property that houses people is wrong in the present day?
No comment.jesus christ, RR..they must love you down at city hall.
did i hit a nerve? hmmmmmmm? totally sig worthy..congrats! never thought i'd see the day!..No comment.
Oh I think that the phrase is stupid altogether. Instead of creating jobs, people should just get the work done and then relax.Please explain which kinds of jobs government "creates" and how they impact other people, if you are able to, Mr. Economist.
No, I didn't want to continue to derail my own thread.did i hit a nerve? hmmmmmmm? totally sig worthy..congrats! never thought i'd see they day!..
Okay. So we agree that government can't really create jobs in a productive and free choice kind of way and that their claims to do so are false?Oh I think that the phrase is stupid altogether. Instead of creating jobs, people should just get the work done and then relax.
The government exists to serve the ruling class and protect private property.Okay. So we agree that government can't really create jobs in a productive and free choice kind of way and that their claims to do so are false?
You could be half right.The government exists to serve the ruling class and protect private property.
Get a dictionary.You could be half right.
Define private property please.
I have several dictionaries. None of them define what YOU think though.Get a dictionary.
You also have internet access apparently.I have several dictionaries.
I'll take your answers as....you are afraid to defend your premise.You also have internet access apparently.
why?I see, that's a fine straw house you are building there Mr. Strawman.
You may have missed my point. He alluded that I hold a position that CRONYISM is a good thing. I don't hold that position. He likes to assign me my beliefs and is afraid to defend his.why?
everyone knows now trickle down doesn't happen.
the ruling class will do anything to keep their money > broken tax code (wealthy not paying a proportionate share of their income as compared to everyone else) > 1% are top heavy..
the top .1% (yes, that's a point) wealth is equivalent to the bottom 90%: