Trudeau would start legalizing pot 'right away'

ricky1lung

ricky1lung

Well-Known Member
doingdishes said:
the thing you have mentioned is that we keep winning in court....we lot our growing rights and we are still going to court over this topic. see the injunction thread or google the Allard trial.
you keep mentioning the "legal" market as the one that will save us but i look at Washington because i have tried it-and the prices are nuts...$20+ a gram. the government will have to let us grow before we can weigh in.
we can speculate all we want but until they sign the papers, it's all just words and thoughts.
i hope you are right and we can grow away. that day will be glorious for all patients.
Click to expand...

Mmar patients did win in court and were granted the right to continue growing.
Mmpr is discriminatory based solely upon that ruling because of the new rules enacted by Harpco concerning home grows. The Allard case will be successful IMO and those under the new system will also be able to grow for themselves.

The challenge may take time but the outcome will be the same as mmar because you cannot be treated differently than others who are legally entitled to grow for med purposes.

It will all come together, even if the courts have to step in to set the gov straight at times. The precedence for med has been set and there's no turning back.

Better days are coming.
 
G

Gmack420

Well-Known Member
ricky1lung said:
Licenses will only be required by those who want to be commercial or med growers and sell their products to the public.

The only reason people need licenses now is because they're growing a plant that remains illegal to the general public but have been allowed to do so for med purposes. The current system allows the tracking and data collection of both med patients and suppliers. They need to know who's growing and how many people are medicating as well as making sure the products are safe from the lp side.

none of that changes the legality of producing a legal plant for the purpose of personal consumption.

When the plant becomes legal, the plant is then legal to grow, possess and consume. Does anyone really think cops would be raiding homes over a legal plant nevermind charging them, will the cops send in the troops over something that is legal to do?
Exactly like growing tobacco or brewing beer.
Click to expand...
Where are you getting any of this? You're just making it up. Liberals have said nothing close to what you claim. You sir are retarded. Just as the people who think decriminalization via the Ndp means fines for possessin. Only diffrece is the Ndp have said they want no criminal or civil penaltys for marijuana. Have fun with your $20+hst "legal" grams thanks to Harper lite JT. Ricky you're just not ready for this election. Wear a sheet and sit in the corner.
 
G

Gmack420

Well-Known Member
LeeLong said:
Isn't that Trudeau a big traitor that is pretty much lying about pot to actually make big bucks on the fake "refugee" business? Theres got to be another pot friendly politician up there besides "traitor trudeau" as he is called by many. I would be watching for a trick...
Click to expand...
Hi did you know the founder of tweed inc licensed producer of medical marijuana is now the CFO for the liberal party of Canada? Good old Chuck. Don't worry I won't forget you chuccky. Oh and tweed is now the biggest by far lp in canada? Half the market. Lol joke is 80% of mmj users in Canada don't even use a lp one time. So yes there is direct links from Justin to chuck and they both want to "legailize" their weed and own the market on "legal" weed in Canada. So vote Ndp. If you care about the subject of marijuana for recreational or medical use they are the best pick of the big 3 shit bags.
 
ricky1lung

ricky1lung

Well-Known Member
Gmack420 said:
Where are you getting any of this? You're just making it up. Liberals have said nothing close to what you claim. You sir are retarded. Just as the people who think decriminalization via the Ndp means fines for possessin. Only diffrece is the Ndp have said they want no criminal or civil penaltys for marijuana. Have fun with your $20+hst "legal" grams thanks to Harper lite JT. Ricky you're just not ready for this election. Wear a sheet and sit in the corner.
Click to expand...

This coming from the guy who boldly claimed JT owns Tweed.

I'm not sure you know how business ( cause I own a few shares of Microsoft so I own the whole company according to you ) or law works.

I won't need $20 grams when it's legal lol
Back on your bus son.
 
G

Gmack420

Well-Known Member
ricky1lung said:
This coming from the guy who boldly claimed JT owns Tweed.

I'm not sure you know how business ( cause I own a few shares of Microsoft so I own the whole company according to you ) or law works.

I won't need $20 grams when it's legal lol
Back on your bus son.
Click to expand...
Well if you grow your own Justin will be sure to lock your dumb ass up.
 
torontoke

torontoke

Well-Known Member
ricky1lung said:
Jackal was wrong and completely misleading in his poppy reference. This is about rec legalization for marijuana not heroin.
We can have the discussion of home poppy grows should the legalization of heroin for recreational purposes ever comes up.
Completely different and has no place in this debate because heroin is not the subject of recreational legalization.

I see you get the regulation aspect by the legal age and where you could potentially purchase it and that they'd need to be licensed.

Just like booze or smokes! So now we're on the same page on that at least.

Under legalization how could they tell you that you must purchase it from them when just like booze or smokes that are sold by licenced establishments you could grow it or produce it at home?
Click to expand...
have u read the quotes from jt?
He keeps mentioning people being able to get it from trustworthy sources like the lcbo. Even in Colorado where his visions of filling his pockets come from they have legal Rec and you can't grow as much as you want. If it's truly legal then there wouldn't be a limit.
And it's a catch 22 because they don't want people growing and selling making money without paying the bs tax but the irony is who the fuck would buy it if we were all allowed to grow it.
 
ricky1lung

ricky1lung

Well-Known Member
torontoke said:
have u read the quotes from jt?
He keeps mentioning people being able to get it from trustworthy sources like the lcbo. Even in Colorado where his visions of filling his pockets come from they have legal Rec and you can't grow as much as you want. If it's truly legal then there wouldn't be a limit.
And it's a catch 22 because they don't want people growing and selling making money without paying the bs tax but the irony is who the fuck would buy it if we were all allowed to grow it.
Click to expand...

And in Colorado where they can grow up to 6 plants they have huge market for lp grown weed. Am I right?

They have both homegrows, (albeit limited to 6 plants) and an lp system. Not everyone can grow or wants to and the lp's get a huge boost in sales just from those people alone.

No one here has told me why that wouldn't be the case but a couple have used Colorado as reference when they say there will be no home grows and that it's the model JT wants.

And I'm the idiot? @Gmack420
 
torontoke

torontoke

Well-Known Member
Jt used the Colorado model multiple times. However no one has specifically mentioned home grows at any time. So the real answer is no one knows. It's all just guessing right now.
I think everyone uses the term legal wrongly. In everyone's perfect world legal means grown everywhere no more pot charges and or limits but really who thinks they will be alive to see that?
It will always be regulated and looked down on by those that don't use it or profit from it.
Legal to politicians means acceptable as long as we can profit off of it. And how do they profit most?
This website is full of people that can grow meds for a fraction of what regulated mj costs so u don't need to be a rocket scientist to realize it's not profitable if the only people that use it can grow their own.
 
c ray

c ray

Well-Known Member
if the libs win, and follow the Colorado model, then there should be no tax on medi weed, only on rec weed. also 5 or 6 plants per house indoors. a victoria lib candidate said they want to regulate safe production, whatever that means, but sounds suspiciously like the MMPR model. it's entirely possible for them to modify the MMPR, lower some of the requirements, to allow for many lp's of various sizes. that's a potential best case scenario.
 
ricky1lung

ricky1lung

Well-Known Member
No one has said there wouldn't be home grows either.

But as some have pointed out JT has mentioned the Colorado model
which allows growing at home. Like I have been arguing about this whole thread.

Please call me more names @Gmack420 and then go back and thank the people who support the argument of home grows and the same position you took at the beginning of this thread.


Gmack420 said:
Look this supply and demand shit is just that shit. Go on leafly or weed maps and look at the reality of legal weed prices in Colorado that JT wants to use as Canadas template for legalization. Fuck that noise.
Click to expand...
I waited, and waited to point out what kind of an ignorant asshole you've been this whole time, but you kept going and so I figured why not.

What is it you have to say about home grows, JTs model and who's an idiot now?
Dim fuk
 
Last edited:
G

Gmack420

Well-Known Member
ricky1lung said:
No one has said there wouldn't be home grows either.

But as some have pointed out JT has mentioned the Colorado model
which allows growing at home. Like I have been arguing about this whole thread.

Please call me more names @Gmack420 and then go back and thank the people who support the argument of home grows and the same position you took at the beginning of this thread.




I waited, and waited to point out what kind of an ignorant asshole you've been this whole time, but you kept going and so I figured why not.

What is it you have to say about home grows, JTs model and who's an idiot now?
Dim fuk
Click to expand...
Where did Justin say we would be allowed to produce our own? How does his stament that it will be modeled off of Colorado equate to home grows in your mind? He can chose to use any part of the Colorado model he never committed to the exact same model retard. The fact he's deliberately leaving the subject of home grows out of the marijuana discussion is all the evidence we need that he doesn't support it at all. In fact he's proudly proclaimed that he will strengthen laws for those who don't partake in his regulatory framework. No where has he said yes we will allow home production. He hasn't said it for a reason it's not part of his plan. You can sit there and assume that next month you'll be able to grow all you want if the liberals win but it's like your mind - Total bullshit.
 
ricky1lung

ricky1lung

Well-Known Member
Gmack420 said:
Where did Justin say we would be allowed to produce our own? How does his stament that it will be modeled off of Colorado equate to home grows in your mind? He can chose to use any part of the Colorado model he never committed to the exact same model retard. The fact he's deliberately leaving the subject of home grows out of the marijuana discussion is all the evidence we need that he doesn't support it at all. In fact he's proudly proclaimed that he will strengthen laws for those who don't partake in his regulatory framework. No where has he said yes we will allow home production. He hasn't said it for a reason it's not part of his plan. You can sit there and assume that next month you'll be able to grow all you want if the liberals win but it's like your mind - Total bullshit.
Click to expand...

You're making larger assumptions than I am by suggesting the guy who stated it would be modelled off of the Colorado model won't allow home grows.

No where has he said there would be no home grows.
So keep calling names and avoid providing a substantial argument to back up your position of absolutely no home grows.

I have a quote from you that gives far more validity to my position than you have given to support your slanderous rants.
 
Darth Vapour

Darth Vapour

Well-Known Member
I was talking to Justin today and MJ is one of least importance there are more important issues at hand economy utmost , medical and taxation , and of course getting out of debt
Most of all politicians will say what you want to here .. to get your vote thats it doing is another story ..
Any politician that lies , or does not do what they promised to win my vote or anyothers should be hung on the door steps of parliament
 
ricky1lung

ricky1lung

Well-Known Member
Darth Vapour said:
I was talking to Justin today and MJ is one of least importance there are more important issues at hand economy utmost , medical and taxation , and of course getting out of debt
Most of all politicians will say what you want to here .. to get your vote thats it doing is another story ..
Any politician that lies , or does not do what they promised to win my vote or anyothers should be hung on the door steps of parliament
Click to expand...
I would hope so.
What did he have to say?
 
G

Gmack420

Well-Known Member
ricky1lung said:
You're making larger assumptions than I am by suggesting the guy who stated it would be modelled off of the Colorado model won't allow home grows.

No where has he said there would be no home grows.
So keep calling names and avoid providing a substantial argument to back up your position of absolutely no home grows.

I have a quote from you that gives far more validity to my position than you have given to support your slanderous rants.
Click to expand...
I assume nothing. Growing your own has specifically not been discussed in this election. Justin isn't for it if he was he would be loud and clear on the subject. His silence on self production says all we need to know. If they are not talking about it then it's not happening. Again you can't prove anything I've said is false because it's all true. You made the Claims it will be treated like potatoes. You made the claim we'll be able to grow our own. You've said the prices will come down because of increased competition with 0 proof the liberals will grant any additional production licenses. Who's making the assumptions here? You! But go ahead vote liberal and you'll get the shitty bald face liers in power you deserve.
 
ricky1lung

ricky1lung

Well-Known Member
Gmack420 said:
I assume nothing. Growing your own has specifically not been discussed in this election. Justin isn't for it if he was he would be loud and clear on the subject. His silence on self production says all we need to know. If they are not talking about it then it's not happening. Again you can't prove anything I've said is false because it's all true. You made the Claims it will be treated like potatoes. You made the claim we'll be able to grow our own. You've said the prices will come down because of increased competition with 0 proof the liberals will grant any additional production licenses. Who's making the assumptions here? You! But go ahead vote liberal and you'll get the shitty bald face liers in power you deserve.
Click to expand...

Lol.
I have backed up every single statement I've made with valid points. Something you still avoid to do on the one simple question I've asked.

Why would it be illegal to grow a legal plant.

May it be limited or not, based upon the model and statement you have been quoted in that JT said he would model off of the Colorado system.

You have screamed and called names in your insistence there will be no home grows without ever backing up a single statement you've made.

Like I said, your own quotes and posts you have liked have given far more validity to my position of home grows than your position of no home grows.

His silence during an election campaign is smart politics when you're being attacked by oppenents for that particular issue. Why give more ammo to the Justin wants kids to get high crowd? So, perhaps that's why he has been vague on the whole matter except stating regulation and laws.

You're chasing your tail and grasping at straws.
Even my very well explained example of the legalities of growing legal produce like potatoes has more validity than anything youve said. Why do you think it was written into law that people Colorado can grow a regulated amount? I'm willing to lay money on the legalities of saying people cannot grow legal plants at home.

So start to prove anything you've stated, just try not to be a hypocrite and change your position constantly and actually provide anything of substance you can.
 
G

Gmack420

Well-Known Member
ricky1lung said:
Lol.
I have backed up every single statement I've made with valid points. Something you still avoid to do on the one simple question I've asked.

Why would it be illegal to grow a legal plant.

May it be limited or not, based upon the model and statement you have been quoted in that JT said he would model off of the Colorado system.

You have screamed and called names in your insistence there will be no home grows without ever backing up a single statement you've made.

Like I said, your own quotes and posts you have liked have given far more validity to my position of home grows than your position of no home grows.

His silence during an election campaign is smart politics when you're being attacked by oppenents for that particular issue. Why give more ammo to the Justin wants kids to get high crowd? So, perhaps that's why he has been vague on the whole matter except stating regulation and laws.

You're chasing your tail and grasping at straws.
Even my very well explained example of the legalities of growing legal produce like potatoes has more validity than anything youve said. Why do you think it was written into law that people Colorado can grow a regulated amount? I'm willing to lay money on the legalities of saying people cannot grow legal plants at home.

So start to prove anything you've stated, just try not to be a hypocrite and change your position constantly and actually provide anything of substance you can.
Click to expand...
It will be illigal because you're not a licensed producer I've said that ever fucking time you've made that same nonsensically argument but I guess I'll just say it again. If you are not a lp you will not be legally growing marijuana under a JT lead liberal party in Canada. If he really believed that marijuana should be legal he'd welcome the smear campaign Harper would use against him as it's easy to defend legalization. Again you assume he's being vague wth the details so he can't be slammed. NO! It's so he can reap the massive amounts of $$ the legal market will be worth and no one else. Ok I bet you $100 that the liberals will not allow home grows/production of marijuana if they are elected in this election. I've never changed my position. It's always been the liberals and JT are not to be trusted.
 
Darth Vapour

Darth Vapour

Well-Known Member
TMU i took our convo as he looked at it as a business end for commercial production per province etc where rec users would still need to purchase it .. so big corp,, as for being legal to grow for everyone he had no comment
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top