UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
at least he didn't plagiarize again.
The Charge: Desertion
- Thread starter schuylaar
- Start date
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Apparently his other hero is the libelous dipshit Chris Kyle.
No, I'm saying the price is adjusted according to race.
Price is posted at 5 bucks, everyone pays 5 bucks except Asians, they get it for 4 dollars.
Like a senior discount is legal because it's given to all seniors, well we'll give it to all the Asians and be good?
We wouldn't be charging non-asians more, just giving discounts to who we choose. Discounted rates are not publicly visible.
Ever been to Hawaii? Do you think the locals pay the same rates as the tourists?
Last edited:
Ever been to Costa Rica?
That's a national pastime for Tico's.
That's a national pastime for Tico's.
Citation required, or its just you blathering again.
You already conceded the victory to me, you don't get to take it back.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Lol, I was toying with you moron. You are about as smart as a bag of hammers. You didn't even read the Wikipedia page that you copy/pasted half of, if you had, you would have known this. Instead, you have turned it into your proudest achievement. Ironically, you are going around demanding citations as if you have a clue what they are.
sheskunk
Well-Known Member
Citation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is about the research concept that acknowledges use of another's ideas. For other uses, see Citation (disambiguation).
"Cite" redirects here. For the HTML element <cite>, see HTML element § cite.
For Wikipedia's citation guideline, see Wikipedia:Citing sources. For Wikipedia's citation templates, see Wikipedia:Citation templates.
"Referencing" redirects here. For other uses, see Reference.
Broadly, a citation is a reference to a published or unpublished source (not always the original source). More precisely, a citation is an abbreviated alphanumeric expression embedded in the body of an intellectual work that denotes an entry in the bibliographic references section of the work for the purpose of acknowledging the relevance of the works of others to the topic of discussion at the spot where the citation appears. Generally the combination of both the in-body citation and the bibliographic entry constitutes what is commonly thought of as a citation (whereas bibliographic entries by themselves are not). References to single, machine-readable assertions in electronic scientific articles are known as nanopublications, a form of microattribution.
Citation has several important purposes: to uphold intellectual honesty (or avoiding plagiarism),[1] to attribute prior or unoriginal work and ideas to the correct sources, to allow the reader to determine independently whether the referenced material supports the author's argument in the claimed way, and to help the reader gauge the strength and validity of the material the author has used.[2]
The forms of citations generally subscribe to one of the generally accepted citations systems, such as the Oxford,[3] Harvard, MLA, American Sociological Association (ASA), American Psychological Association (APA), and other citations systems, as their syntactic conventions are widely known and easily interpreted by readers. Each of these citation systems has its respective advantages and disadvantages relative to the trade-offs of being informative (but not too disruptive) and thus are chosen relative to the needs of the type of publication being crafted. Editors often specify the citation system to use.
Bibliographies, and other list-like compilations of references, are generally not considered citations because they do not fulfil the true spirit of the term: deliberate acknowledgement by other authors of the priority of one's ideas.[4]
Contents
Citation content can vary depending on the type of source and may include:
Along with information such as author(s), date of publication, title and page numbers, citations may also include unique identifiers depending on the type of work being referred to.
Broadly speaking, there are two types of citation systems (the Vancouver system and parenthetical referencing).[9] However, the Council of Science Editors (CSE) adds a third, the citation-name system.[10]
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is about the research concept that acknowledges use of another's ideas. For other uses, see Citation (disambiguation).
"Cite" redirects here. For the HTML element <cite>, see HTML element § cite.
For Wikipedia's citation guideline, see Wikipedia:Citing sources. For Wikipedia's citation templates, see Wikipedia:Citation templates.
"Referencing" redirects here. For other uses, see Reference.
Broadly, a citation is a reference to a published or unpublished source (not always the original source). More precisely, a citation is an abbreviated alphanumeric expression embedded in the body of an intellectual work that denotes an entry in the bibliographic references section of the work for the purpose of acknowledging the relevance of the works of others to the topic of discussion at the spot where the citation appears. Generally the combination of both the in-body citation and the bibliographic entry constitutes what is commonly thought of as a citation (whereas bibliographic entries by themselves are not). References to single, machine-readable assertions in electronic scientific articles are known as nanopublications, a form of microattribution.
Citation has several important purposes: to uphold intellectual honesty (or avoiding plagiarism),[1] to attribute prior or unoriginal work and ideas to the correct sources, to allow the reader to determine independently whether the referenced material supports the author's argument in the claimed way, and to help the reader gauge the strength and validity of the material the author has used.[2]
The forms of citations generally subscribe to one of the generally accepted citations systems, such as the Oxford,[3] Harvard, MLA, American Sociological Association (ASA), American Psychological Association (APA), and other citations systems, as their syntactic conventions are widely known and easily interpreted by readers. Each of these citation systems has its respective advantages and disadvantages relative to the trade-offs of being informative (but not too disruptive) and thus are chosen relative to the needs of the type of publication being crafted. Editors often specify the citation system to use.
Bibliographies, and other list-like compilations of references, are generally not considered citations because they do not fulfil the true spirit of the term: deliberate acknowledgement by other authors of the priority of one's ideas.[4]
Contents
- 1 Concepts
- 2 Content
- 3 Systems
- 4 Styles
- 5 Boundary marks
- 6 Issues
- 7 See also
- 8 Notes
- 9 References
- 10 External links
- A bibliographic citation is a reference to a book, article, web page, or other published item. Citations should supply detail to identify the item uniquely.[5] Different citation systems and styles are used in scientific citation, legal citation, prior art, and the arts and the humanities.
Citation content can vary depending on the type of source and may include:
- Book: author(s), book title, publisher, date of publication, and page number(s) if appropriate.[6][7]
- Journal: author(s), article title, journal title, date of publication, and page number(s).
- Newspaper: author(s), article title, name of newspaper, section title and page number(s) if desired, date of publication.
- Web site: author(s), article and publication title where appropriate, as well as a URL, and a date when the site was accessed.
- Play: inline citations offer part, scene, and line numbers, the latter separated by periods: 4.452 refers to scene 4, line 452. For example, "In Eugene Onegin, Onegin rejects Tanya when she is free to be his, and only decides he wants her when she is already married" (Pushkin 4.452-53).[8]
- Poem: spaced slashes are normally used to indicate separate lines of a poem, and parenthetical citations usually include the line number(s). For example: "For I must love because I live / And life in me is what you give." (Brennan, lines 15–16).[8]
- Interview: name of interviewer, interview descriptor (ex. personal interview) and date of interview.
Along with information such as author(s), date of publication, title and page numbers, citations may also include unique identifiers depending on the type of work being referred to.
- Citations of books may include an International Standard Book Number (ISBN).
- Specific volumes, articles or other identifiable parts of a periodical, may have an associated Serial Item and Contribution Identifier (SICI).
- Electronic documents may have a digital object identifier (DOI).
- Biomedical research articles may have a PubMed Identifier (PMID).
Broadly speaking, there are two types of citation systems (the Vancouver system and parenthetical referencing).[9] However, the Council of Science Editors (CSE) adds a third, the citation-name system.[10]
fingers broken?..google it yourself, farm boi.
sheskunk
Well-Known Member
Going by your own rules, it is the responsibility of the poster making the claim to be the one providing the citation. You know this though.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
I would suggest to any person that forcing an interaction on another person that doesn't want to interact with them is not a nice thing to do.
I would also suggest to anybody that discriminating based on not wanting to serve a floor shitter makes sense, but that based solely on race doesn't make sense to me, but since I didn't own their property and they did it was ultimately their choice to use THEIR property and not the property of others as they see fit.
Sort of like everybody owns their body, and nobody owns anothers body. I would also tell them to watch out for the bad man of your childhood.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
why won't you answer such a simple question?
you advocate for the "right" of business owners to kick black people out of their stores because they are black. how would you suggest a business owner do this racist act in the most peaceful way possible, in keeping with the non-aggression principle?
what is the most peaceful way to be racist?
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
You seem to have a problem with your irony detection meter, take the batteries out of your butt plug and see if they will fix it.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
The most peaceful way to shit on a floor is to shit on your OWN floor, but not insist you can shit on the floor of others unless invited to do so. While I may find your floor shitting reprehensible, I would never deny you your fecal pleasure on your own property...poopy pants.
It IS initiating aggression if a person insists another person will permit them access to their property whether they like it or not, that's exactly what happens when dick wadds burn crosses on other peoples property isn't it?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
The most peaceful way to be anything is to respect the boundary of ownership. You can think what you want and do what you want with YOUR stuff, but don't think you can do what you want with other peoples stuff is a good way to ensure peace.
It's a non-prohibitionist mindset that you are lacking, when you try to control other people and their property.
What is the most peaceful way to tell a person you are going to shit on their floor whether they like it or not?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
that doesn't answer the question.
a white business owner is selling gasoline. a black person walks in and wants to buy gas. the white owner wants to kick him out because he is black.
what is the most peaceful way for the white business owner to kick out the black customer?
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Define peace, Then explain which is the most peaceful way for a person to insist on an interaction, possibly even using force to ensure that interaction takes place, even if the party remaining on their OWN property would prefer not to interact with them.
A person insisting to be left alone on their own property is NOT disturbing the peace are they Mister Prohibitionist?
A person coming onto another persons property, knowing the owner prefers them not to, IS disturbing the peace aren't they?
I win!!!! Again!!!
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
if the party remaining on their OWN property would prefer not to interact with them because of their skin color, what is the most peaceful way for them to kick them out of their store?
and why are you so scared to answer such a simple question about a philosophy which you espouse?
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
If it's their OWN property, the answer is self evident....bonehead.
What is the most peaceful way to force an interaction with a person remaining on their own property Mr. I advocate Property Invasion? Why are you afraid to answer that question?