injunction/court case updates

method_man said:

what if your pink slip was good on march 21st 2014 but you had no ppl or dg?

Click to expand...

Like my ATP .... so your options would be
Send to LP good for a year I suppose
Get your doc to send a different med doc to the LP .... keep your pink (what I did)
Or use your ATP to get from CCS while they last
But you only have a ...."user possession lic"
I think HC pushed through all the ATP ones because I was suprises I got mine so fast took two months

I do believe the ATP could be used down the road for court cases too so don't throw it away

method_man said:

what if your pink slip was good on march 21st 2014 but you had no ppl or dg?

Click to expand...

you can only possess if you didn't or don't have that at the time. they don't issue them anymore but hopefully they will

But I did move a province over lately with my pink ATP

OMG am I a leftover or leftout now hahaha
Who fucking cares grow it smoke it

Jackal69 said:

But I did move a province over lately with my pink ATP

OMG am I a leftover or leftout now hahaha
Who fucking cares grow it smoke it

Click to expand...

i think if you can grow-do it!

doingdishes said:

i think if you can grow-do it!

Click to expand...

I'm totally on board with peeps doing that
Just don't be that dealer

Actually, i wouldnt send in any information to a LP. If you get a note, keep it.

PRACTITIONERS

• 53. (1) No practitioner shall administer a narcotic to a person or animal, or prescribe, sell or provide a narcotic for a person or animal, except as authorized under this section or the Marihuana for Medical Purposes Regulations.
  
  
• (2) Subject to subsections (3) and (4), a practitioner may administer a narcotic other than dried marihuana to a person or animal, or prescribe, sell or provide it for a person or animal, if
  
  • (a) the person or animal is a patient under their professional treatment; and
    
    
  • (b) the narcotic is required for the condition for which the person or animal is receiving treatment.
    
• (3) No practitioner shall administer methadone to a person or animal, or prescribe, sell or provide methadone for a person or animal, unless the practitioner is exempted under section 56 of the Act with respect to methadone.
  
  
• (4) [Repealed, SOR/2013-172, s. 7]
  
  
• (5) A health care practitioner may administer dried marihuana to a person or prescribe or transfer it for a person if
  
  • (a) the person is a patient under their professional treatment; and
    
    
  • (b) the dried marihuana is required for the condition for which the person is receiving treatment.
    

If you decide to grow, use this calculator to find out plant count and storage...obvisouly keep it indoor for security reasons. You could operate in a grey area this way but if you get nabbed you will need to defend your actions.

http://www.marijuanalaws.ca/plant-calculator.html

EDIT - take a look at section 5, if you can get your docotor to prescribe a plant count seems like your fine, its what i got done atleast.

@doingdishes

doingdishes said:

i was left out because i needed (and need) to change DG's and also grow sites. we are not allowed any changes so in essence i have no access but i have current paperwork. i can possess because of the injunction...I can't change site because of what CONroy did in trying to get the variance. his weak attempt didn't do much of anything.
on to the good news-i found out my Dr will help out in getting a sec 53 (not 56) so i am allowed to possess.
i have to send in my new information to HC to get turned down. then i get the sec 53 as well as the information (statements and questions) the good ol' CONroy drafted in case the site gets busted. there's some protection there. it might take a few months but if Allard doesn't help, we can go that route.

Click to expand...

So where the link to the secotin 53 info..... Need to do some reading.

I pasted the info above

bigmanc said:

I pasted the info above

Click to expand...

I see that but it's out of context. Wanted to have a look at the entire act. This is still unclear... Your doctor can prescribe it and allow you to grow it? Has anyone been successful getting a section 53 exemption? With a plant count attached to it? Very confused...

Gmack420 said:

I see that but it's out of context. Wanted to have a look at the entire act. This is still unclear... Your doctor can prescribe it and allow you to grow it? Has anyone been successful getting a section 53 exemption? With a plant count attached to it? Very confused...

Click to expand...

My mmar is sort of a sec 56 and I am allowed 10 grams a day and 49 plants not sure if that will help

GrowRock said:

My mmar is sort of a sec 56 and I am allowed 10 grams a day and 49 plants not sure if that will help

Click to expand...

Well plan was apply for a section 56 exemption which will be denied and then appeal that decion in provincial appeals court. Sort of a back up if goldstars doesn't gain traction soon. But now with this section 53 possibility I'm not sure what to do. A second 53 exemption requires your doctors support correct?

that is the entire act. to be clear, get a doctors note for gpd and indoor plant count for 12months only sticky part might be if its a pot clinic cause it says you need to be a patient

what do you guys think about the silly college guidelines for the mmpr?

Possibly a picture would sum it up best......

bigmanc said:

that is the entire act. to be clear, get a doctors note for gpd and indoor plant count for 12months only sticky part might be if its a pot clinic cause it says you need to be a patient

Click to expand...

So you don't apply for a section 53 exemption you just get a doctors note for gpd and plant count if they're willing?? Or do you then send away for this one year exemption?

Gmack420 said:

So you don't apply for a section 53 exemption you just get a doctors note for gpd and plant count if they're willing?? Or do you then send away for this one year exemption?

Click to expand...

What I have is a doctors note saying I'm continued to be authorized for 15gpd and 73 indoor growth for 12 months, I got my 2nd a week ago. So in writing he prescribed the plant and the harvested material. I'm going to call doingdishes tonight or tomorrow, he has another lead on this regarding address change of pinks and stuff. Last time we were on the phone for 3 hours so I'm going to see if we can make a tutorial for this and the 2nd part of the goldstars

bigmanc said:

What I have is a doctors note saying I'm continued to be authorized for 15gpd and 73 indoor growth for 12 months, I got my 2nd a week ago. So in writing he prescribed the plant and the harvested material. I'm going to call doingdishes tonight or tomorrow, he has another lead on this regarding address change of pinks and stuff. Last time we were on the phone for 3 hours so I'm going to see if we can make a tutorial for this and the 2nd part of the goldstars

Click to expand...

I'm only ever been covered by the mmpr so can I do what you're doing if I have a doctor will to sign a form(s) like yours?

i called the clinic i use and am waiting for their call back to book some time to discuss this. i have only a bit of info. when i talked to a friend, he asked a few questions that I couldn't answer.
when i get more I will post for sure. i am hoping to get in next week. i know a few people who will act on this if it works.
the sec 56 could take up to 2 years according to them.

torontoke said:

If your going to pull pieces of my comment apart then go as far as to quote me. Has any of my posts on here given you the impression that any of the other posters here defend or stand up for me? A patient standing up for a patient.... More like what's right is right and wrong is wrong. Kirk and any of the other hero lawyers that love the publicity while helping patients still make 100grand a case so don't break ur back running to get out your violin to busk for em just yet.
The legal system in Canada sucks.
Ffs how is it even defendable?

Click to expand...

You seem to have a severe axe to grind against lawyers in general, insofar as you'll discount any explanation given by a lawyer as invalid because it's a 'lawyer defending other lawyers', so I'm not really sure what to tell you here. You've characterized any lawyer as someone who only cares about money etc, which is grossly unfair to the people in the profession who work tirelessly to get justice for others.

The current situation for patients does suck, but rule of law is one of the core concepts of democracy and the constitution, blaming lawyers and judges for the system they're required to work within is pointless.

One thing I would really like is even a Tousaw opinion about the injunction specifics, has anyone emailed him and asked for one?