injunction/court case updates

maybe we can use this for the updates.
we now know the judge has reserved his decision to put our case over for a later date so Conroy can help with the edibles case...still not sure how that affects this case but I'm not a lawyer

"Request for adjournment of Allard case denied"

What a cluster fuck.

Itsme.

Good thread, thx dishes.

itsmehigh said:

"Request for adjournment of Allard case denied"

What a cluster fuck.

Itsme.

Click to expand...

denied??!! anything to throw a wrench in the system! they really want this to fail!

let it all fail!!!!!

.... that would mean patients could then continue growing indefinitely until this BS is figured out.........

Harper already stuck Cannada into the ditch by putting everything into oil sands.
they're the ones who paid his ticket into office last election.
I hope they screw him back somehow...
I'm sure they have a fail safe clause that will come out in the wash and show Harper as the moron who gave away his country.

Cannada...hehehe

gb123 said:

let it all fail!!!!!

.... that would mean patients could then continue growing indefinitely until this BS is figured out.........

Harper already stuck Cannada into the ditch by putting everything into oil sands.
they're the ones who paid his ticket into office last election.
I hope they screw him back somehow...
I'm sure they have a fail safe clause that will come out in the wash and show Harper as the moron who gave away his country.

Click to expand...

how does it let us grow indefinitely if it fails? i thought this case is so we CAN grow

as it stands...a few fell through the cracks.
As long as it is in or before the courts, nothing changes for patients who can still grow.
It would also leave the laws open to interpretation. I other words...whats good for one patient is good for another....

gb123 said:

as it stands...a few fell through the cracks.
As long as it is in or before the courts, nothing changes for patients who can still grow.
It would also leave the laws open to interpretation. I other words...whats good for one patient is good for another....

Click to expand...

wouldn't that be nice. should be that way now dammit!

i think it now makes sense for the courts to have done this. if it was one at a time, then they could use evidence from one case to the next and possibly case law if one of them succeeds. some
anything to make the sick suffer!

Thanks to everyone keeping us informed here.

I figured the courts wouldn't adjourn this case for pretty much the same reasons the judge gave.Smith and Allard have very little in common, besides of course they both deal with cannabis. It got me thinking though why Conroy and Co would push for such a thing? Are they spread too thin with 2 major court cases on the go and simply just need more time? Or was there something about the Smith case that actually would help us? I'm no ace attorney or anything but I think they were trying to work an angle with Smith, if I remember correctly Smith was never part of the MMAR in any way, just a regular joe helping some folks out. If his section 7 rights are being violated then surely patient's are too? Thoughts? Opinions? I'm curious what the angle was with this seemingly sudden, last minute move if any.

Sandy420 said:

http://johnconroy.com/pdf/Order-Manson-J-January-6-2015-re-adjournment-January-6-2015.pdf

Click to expand...

Sounds to me like Conroy got his pee pee slapped. How dare he try and waste the courts time....the government never does that...

j0yr1d3 said:

Thanks to everyone keeping us informed here.

I figured the courts wouldn't adjourn this case for pretty much the same reasons the judge gave.Smith and Allard have very little in common, besides of course they both deal with cannabis. It got me thinking though why Conroy and Co would push for such a thing? Are they spread too thin with 2 major court cases on the go and simply just need more time? Or was there something about the Smith case that actually would help us? I'm no ace attorney or anything but I think they were trying to work an angle with Smith, if I remember correctly Smith was never part of the MMAR in any way, just a regular joe helping some folks out. If his section 7 rights are being violated then surely patient's are too? Thoughts? Opinions? I'm curious what the angle was with this seemingly sudden, last minute move if any.

Click to expand...

I think they are spread thin and wanted to focus resources on the bigger challenge....is smith paying for tousaw?or is it the coalition?

j0yr1d3 said:

Thanks to everyone keeping us informed here.

I figured the courts wouldn't adjourn this case for pretty much the same reasons the judge gave.Smith and Allard have very little in common, besides of course they both deal with cannabis. It got me thinking though why Conroy and Co would push for such a thing? Are they spread too thin with 2 major court cases on the go and simply just need more time? Or was there something about the Smith case that actually would help us? I'm no ace attorney or anything but I think they were trying to work an angle with Smith, if I remember correctly Smith was never part of the MMAR in any way, just a regular joe helping some folks out. If his section 7 rights are being violated then surely patient's are too? Thoughts? Opinions? I'm curious what the angle was with this seemingly sudden, last minute move if any.

Click to expand...

i think the angle would be using the "points" against the "other case"
if one judge agrees that there a "true" impediment and rectifies it then that could be used in the other case. if they go on at the same time, the cuts that out of the equation
that's my thought anyway

one thing at a time or it overwhelms the courts/judges

The Smith Case will be heard in Ottawa, at the Supreme Court of Canada, Friday March 20th, 2015. Anyone thinking of going to support?

TURMEL: Sam Mellace says Conroy will appeal for Left-Outs

JCT: Sam Mellace told me he spoke to John Conroy at the
Vancouver hearing where the motion for the adjournment of
their action until after the Owens application at the top.

He asked him what he'd be doing to Beemish and Hebert and
was told he'd be filing the appeal of the Manson refusal and
motion for expansion of the remedy to his, and our, Left
Outs.

Well, that's great news. It would be nice to see 12,000
patients get their grows back. And be able to change address
if Hebert's situation is remedied.

It could moot Stephen Burrows' and Robert Roy's applications
at the Supreme Court of Canada if they get their grows back.

Given there's no new evidence with the refusal, no reasons
why, I could have it filed by tomorrow. But I'm a Wordstar.
So let's see how long it takes Conroy to get it filed. It's
actually a dream appeal and would be very satisfying to
write up.

Of course, I might beat up Manson more than a real lawyer
could but I'd have to say getting it back to the guys who
said they had a right and sent it back for a remedy is a
cheap $50 cinch bet.https://groups.google.com/forum/m/#!topic/can.politics/-KXV-etUpNE

12,000 patients caught in the date snafu...wowsa

maybe a good portion of the 12,000 tried to save some money....and just didn't bother to re-new
anyone in that 3 month period before march probably questioned ...why bother...