What Joe Crowley's Defeat has to do with Superdelegates

SneekyNinja

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
WTF?

Almost all of them had declared AGAINST him before the first primary in an obvious attempt to scuttle his campaign before it ever got started!

Democrats and liberals across the country saw that hamfisted move and it cost the Democrats what turned out to be essential credibility in November.

Do you ever think about what you're saying or do you just let the talking points flow through you?
Click to expand...
You keep talking that shit.

The only reason the Democrat lost was because of an archaic system designed to keep slave states happy.

She won the popular vote by a huge margin, you dog kennel cuck.
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
You've gone round the bend. Bernie just pointed out that they'd declared against him even before the primaries began.

You can piss and whine about how it might not actually BE rigged, but anyone looking at it would certainly think it looked corrupt and slanted.

The Democrats have a serious problem actually listening to those it purports to represent.

Not coincidentally, so do you.
Click to expand...
the minority block knew and refused to show.
 
P

peabody2018

Well-Known Member
SneekyNinja said:
You keep talking that shit.

The only reason the Democrat lost was because of an archaic system designed to keep slave states happy.

She won the popular vote by a huge margin, you dog kennel cuck.
Click to expand...
<1% is a “huge” margin? The electoral system was in the Constitution at the founding of the nation. You know, back when there were maybe a few dozen slaves
 
Justin-case

Justin-case

Well-Known Member
peabody2018 said:
The electoral system was in the Constitution at the founding of the nation. You know, back when there were maybe a few dozen slaves
Click to expand...
Excuse me, pea brain.

Slave ships to those regions that are part of the present-day United States[14]
Date Ships
1620–1650 824
1651–1675 0
1676–1700 3,327
1701–1725 3,277
1726–1750 34,004
1751–1775 84,580
1776–1800 67,443
1801–1825 109,545
1826–1850 1,850
1851–1866 476
Total305,326https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_the_United_States
 
P

peabody2018

Well-Known Member
Justin-case said:
Excuse me, pea brain.

Slave ships to those regions that are part of the present-day United States[14]
Date Ships
1620–1650 824
1651–1675 0
1676–1700 3,327
1701–1725 3,277
1726–1750 34,004
1751–1775 84,580
1776–1800 67,443
1801–1825 109,545
1826–1850 1,850
1851–1866 476
Total305,326https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_the_United_States
Click to expand...
You do realize Democrats were the party of slavery?
Your claims are suspect. 67,443 slave ships in 1776? I doubt there were that many ships of any kind.
Oh, I see you’re quoting Wikipedia. I could go there and change those numbers right now. Anybody can edit entries.
Just noticed it gave a total number of ships. Because all ships lasted over 200 years?
 
Last edited:
Justin-case

Justin-case

Well-Known Member
peabody2018 said:
You do realize Democrats were the party of slavery?
Your claims are suspect. 67,443 slave ships in 1776? I doubt there were that many ships of any kind.
Oh, I see you’re quoting Wikipedia. I could go there and change those numbers right now. Anybody can edit entries.
Just noticed it gave a total number of ships. Because all ships lasted over 200 years?
Click to expand...
You should probably go change them then, let us know how it goes. BTW it was sixty seven thousand over a four year period, pea brain.
 
Unclebaldrick

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
peabody2018 said:
You do realize Democrats were the party of slavery?
Your claims are suspect. 67,443 slave ships in 1776? I doubt there were that many ships of any kind.
Oh, I see you’re quoting Wikipedia. I could go there and change those numbers right now. Anybody can edit entries.
Just noticed it gave a total number of ships. Because all ships lasted over 200 years?
Click to expand...
You are really dumb, Red. I am amazed you could even start those fires.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
SneekyNinja said:
You keep talking that shit.

The only reason the Democrat lost was because of an archaic system designed to keep slave states happy.

She won the popular vote by a huge margin, you dog kennel cuck.
Click to expand...
More word salad that confirms that no fancy alphabet soup behind your name can cover for your abject stupidity.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
Yes it is. I saw it happening. So did you.

But go vote for another Corporate shill and see how that works out.
Click to expand...
No

Bernie stated that his strategy was to get superdelegates on his side and subvert the will of the voters

He spoke publicly about his strategy many times
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top