What Joe Crowley's Defeat has to do with Superdelegates

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Yes it is. I saw it happening. So did you.

But go vote for another Corporate shill and see how that works out.
Sanders supporters are the definition of hypocrites.


The Hypocrisy of Sanders's Superdelegate Push
Asking Democratic party elites to support him after he garnered fewer votes, won fewer states, and earned fewer pledged delegates cuts against the core spirit of his candidacy.

CONOR FRIEDERSDORF
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/06/bernie-sanders-superdelegates/486131/

If Sanders would have won more votes, more states, and more pledged delegates, but been denied the Democratic nomination by superdelegates, his supporters would have erupted in outrage, denouncing the nomination as stolen and illegitimate.

Those same supporters cannot in good faith support a Sanders push to secure the nomination with superdelegates now that he has won fewer votes, states, and pledged delegates. It would be farcical for a man who says he’s running to inspire a “political revolution” to ascend to power via party elites subverting the will of voters.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
No

Bernie stated that his strategy was to get superdelegates on his side and subvert the will of the voters

He spoke publicly about his strategy many times
He's spoken many times about getting rid of the Superdelegate system because it subverts the will of the rank and file... which of course was the whole point of them to begin with.

If you have to resort to lying maybe your position isn't as sound as you think it is.

I get it. You're an establishment Democrat. Go lick Clinton's boots some more.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Sanders supporters are the definition of hypocrites.


The Hypocrisy of Sanders's Superdelegate Push
Asking Democratic party elites to support him after he garnered fewer votes, won fewer states, and earned fewer pledged delegates cuts against the core spirit of his candidacy.

CONOR FRIEDERSDORF
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/06/bernie-sanders-superdelegates/486131/

If Sanders would have won more votes, more states, and more pledged delegates, but been denied the Democratic nomination by superdelegates, his supporters would have erupted in outrage, denouncing the nomination as stolen and illegitimate.

Those same supporters cannot in good faith support a Sanders push to secure the nomination with superdelegates now that he has won fewer votes, states, and pledged delegates. It would be farcical for a man who says he’s running to inspire a “political revolution” to ascend to power via party elites subverting the will of voters.
If you spent half the time on pushing for candidates as you do bashing Bernie you'd actually have some credibility.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
If you spent half the time on pushing for candidates as you do bashing Bernie you'd actually have some credibility.
Actually, Bernie's campaign did try to subvert the will of the Democratic Party voters by trying to get Superdelegates to switch their vote to him. They did this in closed door meeting just before the election.

The Hypocrisy of Sanders's Superdelegate Push
Asking Democratic party elites to support him after he garnered fewer votes, won fewer states, and earned fewer pledged delegates cuts against the core spirit of his candidacy.

CONOR FRIEDERSDORF
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/06/bernie-sanders-superdelegates/486131/
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
fuck bernie sanders. he doesn't have a fucking chance to beat trump.
Who better? Another fucking Clinton?

Why not just hold a coronation instead of a primary?

The problem is that neither party is willing to let citizens nominate their own favorites, preferring to pocket huge sums in return for nominating candidates who raise the most money.

Last I checked, democracy is not a synonym for 'highest bidder wins'.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
He's spoken many times about getting rid of the Superdelegate system because it subverts the will of the rank and file... which of course was the whole point of them to begin with.

If you have to resort to lying maybe your position isn't as sound as you think it is.

I get it. You're an establishment Democrat. Go lick Clinton's boots some more.
do you want to see videos of bernie sanders, after getting his clock cleaned by clinton, saying he wants to flip superdelegates over to his side to win anyway?
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Actually, Bernie's campaign did try to subvert the will of the Democratic Party voters by trying to get Superdelegates to switch their vote to him. They did this in closed door meeting just before the election.

The Hypocrisy of Sanders's Superdelegate Push
Asking Democratic party elites to support him after he garnered fewer votes, won fewer states, and earned fewer pledged delegates cuts against the core spirit of his candidacy.

CONOR FRIEDERSDORF
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/06/bernie-sanders-superdelegates/486131/
Can't help yourself, can you?

You can be counted on to bash Bernie all day long- even while trying to cover it up by saying you voted for him.

If you spent that effort promoting others who pledge to solve those problems you might actually regain some credibility.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Can't help yourself, can you?

You can be counted on to bash Bernie all day long- even while trying to cover it up by saying you voted for him.

If you spent that effort promoting others who pledge to solve those problems you might actually regain some credibility.
how is citing a news article "bashing bernie"?

we're literally just trying to get you to accept reality
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
do you want to see videos of bernie sanders, after getting his clock cleaned by clinton, saying he wants to flip superdelegates over to his side to win anyway?
What's your opinion of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and her platform?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Because you literally don't do anything else.
after getting millions less votes, bernie publicly declared he woul[d try to use the superdelegates to subvert the will of the people and get the nomination

you denied this fact. you claimed it was not true

so for pages now we have been cramming this reality down your throat.

swallow it boy
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
after getting millions less votes, bernie publicly declared he woul[d try to use the superdelegates to subvert the will of the people and get the nomination

you denied this fact. you claimed it was not true

so for pages now we have been cramming this reality down your throat.

swallow it boy
Bash bash bash bash

Being constructive should come more easily to a carpenter but maybe you're the exception.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Can't help yourself, can you?

You can be counted on to bash Bernie all day long- even while trying to cover it up by saying you voted for him.

If you spent that effort promoting others who pledge to solve those problems you might actually regain some credibility.
I have no remorse about pointing out that Bernie Sanders tried to subvert the results of an election by back room dealing for the votes of superdelegates.

It was you that brought up the fake story of superdelegates "stealing the election" from Bernie. I replied with the truth and make no apology for that. It's you who are trying to cover up facts with a lie.

Your lie, which you keep repeating, is that Bernie's nomination for president was stolen by superdelegates. That is not only false but in fact it was Bernie who tried to steal the election. The only reason you are crying about my posting the facts is because we were able to stop Bernie from stealing the election.

Facts are not subject to your opinion. You are crying foul when I speak truth. Fuck that.
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
More word salad that confirms that no fancy alphabet soup behind your name can cover for your abject stupidity.
Word salad?

Is that what you morons call "objective fact" now?

What part of any of it was untrue and how?

Otherwise just stfu...In fact, you should probably just stfu either way given how consistently wrong you are.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Word salad?

Is that what you morons call "objective fact" now?

What part of any of it was untrue and how?

Otherwise just stfu...In fact, you should probably just stfu either way given how consistently wrong you are.
Derp.

Pompous clown.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
I'm a Progressive and I've been consistently for Bernie- and now AOC.

All y'all establishment Dems have consistently bashed on Bernie and devoted rather little in the way of column inches about what you DO want.

The contrast is hard to miss.
 
Top