| What burden of proof do redhats have with convicting democrats of election fraud in this investigation with what we know? Is the conviction: - Reasonable Suspicion - Reasonable to Believe - Probable Cause - Preponderance of evidence - Clear and convincing evidence - Beyond a reasonable doubt |
Beyond a reasonable doubt is to affirm a conviction of a criminal case. I think what you mean is that Democrats are Not Guilty of fraud instead of Beyond a Reasonable Doubt of being convicted of fraud. There is a difference.
not in this instance
please provide evidence, witnesses, and documentation.
not in this instance
release the Kraken
fake news
go on. im listening. explain why democrats are beyond a reasonable doubt convicted of fraud? From your words, you are saying Trump lost by a landslide, but democrats are beyond a reasonable doubt convicted of fraud. This doesn't make sense.
first off, Judge Judy, this sentence makes no sense.
u mad bro?
Yeah? so?
You sound like an 8 years old throwing a tantrum about republicans. STFU already. No one likes you
how so? im just asking questions.
u dumb chit!
Exactly.
come back when you can formulate a sentence in English, bro.
