"The Official Zimmerman Walks Thread"

[tryingtogrow89]

it is a definition that is agreed upon by many, many folks.

sorry to inform you, but you are a holocaust denier.

I dont even know what that means.

 

[UncleBuck]

I dont even know what that means.

that is why i am more than happy to post the definition for you (i did so in the other thread).

not surprised that you live in your own little fantasy conspiracy bubble, impervious to mundane facts and definitions.

 

[tryingtogrow89]

that is why i am more than happy to post the definition for you (i did so in the other thread).

not surprised that you live in your own little fantasy conspiracy bubble, impervious to mundane facts and definitions.

It didn't define me, so nice fail again.

 

[UncleBuck]

It didn't define me, so nice fail again.

actually, you fit the definition exactly. allow me to illustrate, since you are too dumb/illiterate/delusional to put two and two together.

The key claims of Holocaust denial are...the actual number of Jews killed was significantly (typically an order of magnitude) lower than the historically accepted figure of 5 to 6 million.[SUP][2][/SUP][SUP][3][/SUP][SUP][4][/SUP]

since your claim (copied and pasted from yahoo answers ) is that about 1 million jews died in the holocaust, you claim that the numbers of jews killed was 5-6 orders of magnitude lower than the historically accepted figure.

you're gonna need some better sources than a fucking copy and paste from yahoo answers to convince the world's historians that you are right and they are all wrong, rapunzel.

 

[tryingtogrow89]

actually, you fit the definition exactly. allow me to illustrate, since you are too dumb/illiterate/delusional to put two and two together.

The key claims of Holocaust denial are...the actual number of Jews killed was significantly (typically an order of magnitude) lower than the historically accepted figure of 5 to 6 million.[SUP][2][/SUP][SUP][3][/SUP][SUP][4][/SUP]

since your claim (copied and pasted from yahoo answers ) is that about 1 million jews died in the holocaust, you claim that the numbers of jews killed was 5-6 orders of magnitude lower than the historically accepted figure.

you're gonna need some better sources than a fucking copy and paste from yahoo answers to convince the world's historians that you are right and they are all wrong, rapunzel.

I dont feel up to typing that much out and those people have exactly what i have to say.

 

[UncleBuck]

I dont feel up to typing that much out and those people have exactly what i have to say.

face it, you're a holocaust denier. plain and simple.

and you think yahoo answers is some sort of definitive source. while less repugnant, that is every bit as worrying with respect to what it says about your complete lack of intelligence.

 

[tryingtogrow89]

face it, you're a holocaust denier. plain and simple.

and you think yahoo answers is some sort of definitive source. while less repugnant, that is every bit as worrying with respect to what it says about your complete lack of intelligence.

Wrong, its a complete lack of getting philosophical with you on my own terms.
I don't want to waste my energy, i am being efficient.

 

[BigNBushy]

It is a fact that the "estimate" of how many Jews were killed during that tragic event were continually increased over the 20th century.

 

[UncleBuck]

Wrong, its a complete lack of getting philosophical with you on my own terms.
I don't want to waste my energy, i am being efficient.

this is not a philosophical debate, this is about well-documented historical occurrences.

you have zero evidence to support your misguided conspiracies, and so this is your cop out.

please reserve your nonsense blather about nefarious jewish kabals for circles of like minded idiots like yourself.

 

[tryingtogrow89]

this is not a philosophical debate, this is about well-documented historical occurrences.

you have zero evidence to support your misguided conspiracies, and so this is your cop out.

please reserve your nonsense blather about nefarious jewish kabals for circles of like minded idiots like yourself.

The only assertion that someone would be able to make based of what i typed,
would be that i don't agree with (as the definition you posted stated) the accepted number.
Was it all atrocious? disgusting? vile? yes.
Do i buy the "accepted death toll"? no.
I never even stated what i truly believe the number is.
Truth being, i don't know, and not one scholar or historian for that matter can know for certain either.

 

[UncleBuck]

The only assertion that someone would be able to make based of what i typed,
would be that i don't agree with (as the definition you posted stated) the accepted number.
Was it all atrocious? disgusting? vile? yes.
Do i buy the "accepted death toll"? no.
I never even stated what i truly believe the number is.
Truth being, i don't know, and not one scholar or historian for that matter can know for certain either.

but if they do say it's 5-6 million, instead of the 1 million that you propose based on a yahoo answer, then it's just because they are a jew.

see my sig.

you gave away your game very early on, and you were unequivocal.

you do no accept historically documented fact, and only jews buy into that whole thing.

 

[tryingtogrow89]

but if they do say it's 5-6 million, instead of the 1 million that you propose based on a yahoo answer, then it's just because they are a jew.

see my sig.

you gave away your game very early on, and you were unequivocal.

you do no accept historically documented fact, and only jews buy into that whole thing.

Even if i thought it were 1 million, you then can call me a holocaust denier, when it should be holocaust revisionist.
You're conditioned.

 

[UncleBuck]

Even if i thought it were 1 million, you then can call me a holocaust denier, when it should be holocaust revisionist.
You're conditioned.

Holocaust deniers generally do not accept the term denial as an appropriate description of their activities, and use the term revisionism instead.[SUP][5][/SUP] Scholars use the term "denial" to differentiate Holocaust deniers from historical revisionists, who use established historical methodologies.[SUP][6][/SUP] The methodologies of Holocaust deniers are criticized as based on a predetermined conclusion that ignores extensive historical evidence to the contrary.[SUP][7]

[/SUP]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocaust_denial

 

[Doer]

It is a fact that the "estimate" of how many Jews were killed during that tragic event were continually increased over the 20th century.

Not true and you are showing, youth ignorace and a nazi mentality. Do you think war is something that starts and ends?

No, War is eternal.

What has happen is scholars that stack their careers on facts. That simple fact it lost to most. Most are at the crybaby level of patterning what they can swallow.

I will bet you a piece of my best hash, you have not done a lick of independent research on this.

I don't buy any assertions from you or anyone. I am the Acid Skeptic.

If it was more like 10 million killed in the camps if you add political prisoners, gypsy, artists, students and assorted riff-raff of thieves and general undesirables to the Jews that were killed there.

So, to me 10 million is not a lot to die. But, it is a lot to be systematically murder and since war is not ever over, there will be more of this soon enough. We've had many instances since then.

Cambodia, Laos, Bosnia, Rowanda. To deny ethnic killing means you side with the exterminators.

 

[desert dude]

gaythinkprogress.gaythinkprogress.gay

Now, THIS is spam and should be deleted.

 

[MuyLocoNC]

but if they do say it's 5-6 million, instead of the 1 million that you propose based on a yahoo answer, then it's just because they are a jew.

see my sig.

you gave away your game very early on, and you were unequivocal.

you do no accept historically documented fact, and only jews buy into that whole thing.

I'm confused, maybe someone can clear it up for me. Even if 1 million were killed instead of 5-6 million, wouldn't it still be a holocaust? Does disagreeing with the exact body count mean someone is a holocaust denier?

I was wondering if there is a minimum number for it to be a holocaust, like an individual isn't a serial killer until he has reached a minimum number of kills.

 

[UncleBuck]

I'm confused, maybe someone can clear it up for me. Even if 1 million were killed instead of 5-6 million, wouldn't it still be a holocaust? Does disagreeing with the exact body count mean someone is a holocaust denier?

depends on how exact you're talking about.

if you're arguing whether it was 5.25 million versus 5.35 million, no. there is some dispute about the exact number.

if you're going by the definition, disagreeing by orders of magnitude does put you squarely in the holocaust denier category.

our silky haired amiga cemented his place in that category by implying that only a jew would believe that number. see my sig.

 

[tryingtogrow89]

depends on how exact you're talking about.

if you're arguing whether it was 5.25 million versus 5.35 million, no. there is some dispute about the exact number.

if you're going by the definition, disagreeing by orders of magnitude does put you squarely in the holocaust denier category.

our silky haired amiga cemented his place in that category by implying that only a jew would believe that number. see my sig.

I can, with certainty, say you're a jew your self for getting so offended. Little bitch!
You're a little bitch for the jews just like your leader.
I can dispute the number all i want, i never said what i thought the number was you low comprehension piece of shit!
Go fuck your self!
House hobbit bitch boy.

 

[tryingtogrow89]

Uncle buck will be one of the first to parish when the ousting begins.

 

[Flaming Pie]

Spam. You are all reported.






lol jk