The Junk Drawer

printer

Well-Known Member
"Maybe I did fuck up."

X brings back news headlines in user posts
X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter, is bringing back news headlines in user posts, reversing a change made by owner Elon Musk.

In October, Musk announced that the social media platform would change how links to news posts would appear in users’ feeds. It removed headlines and text that were previously displayed alongside images.

Most linked articles only displayed the article’s lead image, with a small link to the outlet’s web address in the corner to distinguish from stand-alone images, The Hill previously reported.

The Hill has reached out to X for comment. Neither Musk nor X Support have posted online about the change.

Musk confirmed in August that he planned to remove headlines and said the change was coming from him “directly” and was meant to improve aesthetics.

Critics of the change made it known that removing headlines made it difficult to distinguish what news articles users were sharing and where the links directed people to.

Now, with the change appearing to be reversed, users can post links and headline text will appear on the bottom left of the image in a small font.

Musk, a billionaire who acquired the platform for $44 billion last fall, has criticized legacy news outlets and encouraged publishers to post their content in long form on the platform instead of via links.

More to come?
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
I posted it to show that there are competing theories and some of the more speculative ones involve quantum mechanics. The article offers an overview of the field, and you can place me in the connectionist camp.
The "evidence" I posted regarding out of body experiences is flimsy. It's held up to scrutiny but it's not very helpful toward understanding what consciousness is. I try to hinge my posts on what can be proven. The problem with discussing free will or consciousness is our theories up to now don't hold up to scrutiny. We only know what it is not. Unlike the story that a woman gave, a woman who is and has been blind from birth but accurately described the room she was in and doctor who was treating her when she was near death, people's posts about neural networks some day becoming conscious are based upon pure speculation. There is not even one shred of even flimsy evidence that this is true.

We have no idea what consciousness is or where it resides. Or how it does what it does. Its not that there aren't good scientists working on the problem and churning out papers and earning worthy PhDs on the subject. You aren't citing bullshit that you made up. You are citing somebody else's bullshit. "If true then" lmfao


Back in 1998, premier neuroscientist Christof Koch had wagered philosopher of mind David Chalmers a case of fine wine that within the next twenty-five years, a specific “signature of consciousness” would be found in the brain. In 2018, Swedish journalist Per Snaprud reminded the world of that fact at New Scientist. With five years to run, a countdown of sorts began. Snaprud’s article was titled “Consciousness: How we’re solving a mystery bigger than our minds,” telling readers that “we’re uncovering clues.”

But you know what, friends and neighbors? The mystery is bigger than experts in information science experts thought. The philosopher won a case of wine because after 25 years, both agreed that:

So there is no known signature of human consciousness in the brain. We all sense that we are conscious but that sense is not located in any one place or current.

The wagerers were well matched. Koch (pictured), from the Allen Institute for Brain Science in Seattle, is the leading proponent of Integrated Information Theory (IIT), which he admits is panpsychist (all life and perhaps even non-life is conscious to some extent).

Chalmers, co-director of the Center for Mind, Brain and Consciousness at New York University, originated the term “Hard Problem of Consciousness.” He told Robert Lawrence Kuhn at Closer to Truth that he accepts dualism (the human mind is immaterial) though he does not believe in an immortal soul:

"The human mind is immaterial"
when it comes to consciousness. Chew on that for a minute. I can't even say what that means except that its not going to make anybody a billion dollars any time soon. Neural networks my ass. We can't even say what it is they are going to replicate.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Perhaps they should name the D factor for Donald since he seems to have all of them.

Putin practically drips dark triad. Not surprised that Trump, who is to Putin as Wrenfield is to Dracula, mimics the same syndrome as his master.
 
Last edited:

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
The "evidence" I posted regarding out of body experiences is flimsy. It's held up to scrutiny but it's not very helpful toward understanding what consciousness is. I try to hinge my posts on what can be proven. The problem with discussing free will or consciousness is our theories up to now don't hold up to scrutiny. We only know what it is not. Unlike the story that a woman gave, a woman who is and has been blind from birth but accurately described the room she was in and doctor who was treating her when she was near death, people's posts about neural networks some day becoming conscious are based upon pure speculation. There is not even one shred of even flimsy evidence that this is true.

We have no idea what consciousness is or where it resides. Or how it does what it does. Its not that there aren't good scientists working on the problem and churning out papers and earning worthy PhDs on the subject. You aren't citing bullshit that you made up. You are citing somebody else's bullshit. "If true then" lmfao


Back in 1998, premier neuroscientist Christof Koch had wagered philosopher of mind David Chalmers a case of fine wine that within the next twenty-five years, a specific “signature of consciousness” would be found in the brain. In 2018, Swedish journalist Per Snaprud reminded the world of that fact at New Scientist. With five years to run, a countdown of sorts began. Snaprud’s article was titled “Consciousness: How we’re solving a mystery bigger than our minds,” telling readers that “we’re uncovering clues.”

But you know what, friends and neighbors? The mystery is bigger than experts in information science experts thought. The philosopher won a case of wine because after 25 years, both agreed that:

So there is no known signature of human consciousness in the brain. We all sense that we are conscious but that sense is not located in any one place or current.

The wagerers were well matched. Koch (pictured), from the Allen Institute for Brain Science in Seattle, is the leading proponent of Integrated Information Theory (IIT), which he admits is panpsychist (all life and perhaps even non-life is conscious to some extent).

Chalmers, co-director of the Center for Mind, Brain and Consciousness at New York University, originated the term “Hard Problem of Consciousness.” He told Robert Lawrence Kuhn at Closer to Truth that he accepts dualism (the human mind is immaterial) though he does not believe in an immortal soul:

"The human mind is immaterial"
when it comes to consciousness. Chew on that for a minute. I can't even say what that means except that its not going to make anybody a billion dollars any time soon. Neural networks my ass. We can't even say what it is they are going to replicate.
This is just a general discussion of a complex scientific and philosophical issue(s). Science depends on objective quantifiable and qualifiable evidence. People have extolled the virtues of meditation for a long time, but it is only when scientists produced objective evidence with MRI, PET scanners and high-resolution EEGs that it was taken seriously. However, theory and speculation have their place at the edge of knowledge too. I'm skeptical of quantum involvement in neural processes and think connectionist theories fit the existing data better and can account for the objectively observed mental phenomena. Humans are not unique, lots of creatures have brains, many of them complex, but they are not as uniquely social as humans with language culture and resulting technology.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Putin practically drips dark triad. Not surprised that Trump, who is to Putin as Wrenfield is to Dracula, mimics the same syndrome as his master.
It's kinda ironic, Trump is the useful idiot, but he never fucked up as badly as Putin when he invaded Ukraine IMO. Both should go down about the same time it would appear.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
This is just a general discussion of a complex scientific and philosophical issue(s). Science depends on objective quantifiable and qualifiable evidence. People have extolled the virtues of meditation for a long time, but it is only when scientists produced objective evidence with MRI, PET scanners and high-resolution EEGs that it was taken seriously. However, theory and speculation have their place at the edge of knowledge too. I'm skeptical of quantum involvement in neural processes and think connectionist theories fit the existing data better and can account for the objectively observed mental phenomena. Humans are not unique, lots of creatures have brains, many of them complex, but they are not as uniquely social as humans with language culture and resulting technology.
Agreed. When we find ways to define and measure consciousness, we will make progress in understanding it. As with meditation, men of science scoffed at the stories of practitioners. It took time to develop the tools and methods needed to produce objective evidence that confirmed what was already known by people who weren't versed, bound or hampered by the scientific method. Then again, there are many beliefs that prove to be false. The benefits of meditation were hiding among others, like, say, the healing power of crystals. Sorting them out take time. I think what we are discussing are the kinds of data that drives investigations. Some investigations are based on false assumptions. Sometimes, learning enough to disprove a theory gains us the knowledge to propose a better one. To discard an observation because it conflicts with one's sense of what is proper about science would be a waste if it turned out to be true.
 

CCGNZ

Well-Known Member
would appreciate a link on that.
Just google "US security level Majestic" and then click on "Security Clearance Organization Chart", this info has been out there for yrs.,I'd seen it before and didn't remember anything other than "majestic" was at the top,I'd known and at first was blown away that of a sitting Pres.was only half way up the list. Since Pres. come and go there has to be a higher level keeper of secrets but 21 positions above is mindblowing.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
This is just a general discussion of a complex scientific and philosophical issue(s). Science depends on objective quantifiable and qualifiable evidence. People have extolled the virtues of meditation for a long time, but it is only when scientists produced objective evidence with MRI, PET scanners and high-resolution EEGs that it was taken seriously. However, theory and speculation have their place at the edge of knowledge too. I'm skeptical of quantum involvement in neural processes and think connectionist theories fit the existing data better and can account for the objectively observed mental phenomena. Humans are not unique, lots of creatures have brains, many of them complex, but they are not as uniquely social as humans with language culture and resulting technology.
The question that unsettles me is: how much do culture and technology really matter?

We as a species are proud of both, and we use our possession of both to claim that we are Special. Many nonscientists believe we should not be classed with animals, an attitude that was so pervasive when I was young that it required an act of effort for me to abandon it.

Stripped of a self-referent exclusivism that had roots in religion, the obviousness of culture and tech being a watershed is no longer so assured. In fact, our capacity for coordinated delusion suggests to me that we are actually presapient. (Like termites with more complex communication and a fancy world-spanning mound.)

It’s not a fully-developed idea, and even bringing my full imagination to bear, I cannot picture the next step or the way toward it. It might be confirmation bias of some sort to say it fits with my sorta-hypothesis that we are still in an early transition state away from “the animal condition” of operating on heritable instinct.

Even that still-widespread idea of animals vs. us shows cracks. Young mammal predators must learn how to effectively hunt, a thing taught by their mothers or packmates. Some birds and mammals have definite cultures in which techniques and stories about dangers experienced generations ago by those long dead are passed onto the young.

We’re not that special. The principal thing we have is a matter of scale, not of kind.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
The question that unsettles me is: how much do culture and technology really matter?

We as a species are proud of both, and we use our possession of both to claim that we are Special. Many nonscientists believe we should not be classed with animals, an attitude that was so pervasive when I was young that it required an act of effort for me to abandon it.

Stripped of a self-referent exclusivism that had roots in religion, the obviousness of culture and tech being a watershed is no longer so assured. In fact, our capacity for coordinated delusion suggests to me that we are actually presapient. (Like termites with more complex communication and a fancy world-spanning mound.)

It’s not a fully-developed idea, and even bringing my full imagination to bear, I cannot picture the next step or the way toward it. It might be confirmation bias of some sort to say it fits with my sorta-hypothesis that we are still in an early transition state away from “the animal condition” of operating on heritable instinct.

Even that still-widespread idea of animals vs. us shows cracks. Young mammal predators must learn how to effectively hunt, a thing taught by their mothers or packmates. Some birds and mammals have definite cultures in which techniques and stories about dangers experienced generations ago by those long dead are passed onto the young.

We’re not that special. The principal thing we have is a matter of scale, not of kind.
We humans are highly social animals and cannot really exist outside a social context, even in modern times we crave company. Thus, our evolution tended towards group survival as opposed to individual survival, men are disposable, women are not for example. We also have the longest developmental cycle of any animal and childhood last a long time, it takes a village to protect and foster such children. Our cultures meant everything at one point, all knowledge and technology were bound up with language and religion, a common belief that united the tribe. The culture wars strike deep into our evolutionary history to trigger behaviors in modern times. Our socialization drove our need to communicate and thus language and abstract thought. After agrarian civilization writing arose allowing the transmission of knowledge through time on to printing which vastly improved the concept and spread of knowledge and so it went with iterative change. We are not so brilliant as individuals, but as groups were awesome and very dangerous, sometimes to ourselves too!
 

printer

Well-Known Member
Just google "US security level Majestic" and then click on "Security Clearance Organization Chart", this info has been out there for yrs.,I'd seen it before and didn't remember anything other than "majestic" was at the top,I'd known and at first was blown away that of a sitting Pres.was only half way up the list. Since Pres. come and go there has to be a higher level keeper of secrets but 21 positions above is mindblowing.
How about links? We all do them to get on the same page. I see a number of links I can click on with the first terms.


found it,


OK, where is this from? There is no links or reference where this originated. Could even have been me!
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
How about links? We all do them to get on the same page. I see a number of links I can click on with the first terms.


found it,


OK, where is this from? There is no links or reference where this originated. Could even have been me!
Apparently, it included a young airforce private in the national guard who passed it around on a gamer website too...
 

printer

Well-Known Member
Majestic 12 security clearances
The Majestic 12 security clearances are various ranks that members of Majestic 12 can acquire. These ranks allow the person access to a certain amount of classified information, with more information being disclosed to them as their rank increases.

Background
After Majestic 12 broke away from the Illuminati, Bob Page decided to replace the Illuminati's "Degrees of Illuminism" with a hierarchy of security clearances. While the Degrees of Illuminism were apparently based in mysticism and religious symbolism, and seemed to be modeled on the Allied Masonic Degrees of the Freemasons, Page implemented a standardized, secular system that could be used throughout MJ12. UNATCO, in particular, uses Majestic 12's security clearances, since the Coalition is effectively MJ12's military branch; most of its personnel are unaware of their true employer, or even that it exists.

Ironically, as Stanton Dowd comments, Page's names for these new, secular security clearances came from Christian theology. Specifically, MJ12's clearances correspond directly to the hierarchy of angels established by Thomas Aquinas, a personal icon to Page. The security clearances provide an incentive for MJ12 members to remain loyal to the organization. Recruits know that if they perform well, they will be rewarded with advancements "through the layers of secrecy".

Structure
Although it is clear that the names of the security clearances are based on Aquinas' angelic hierarchy, not all of the clearance levels are named in Deus Ex. The column on the left shows the ranks mentioned in the game, while the one on the right fills the unknown with speculation based on Aquinas' hierarchy and examples seen in-game.

RankingClearances appearing in Deus ExFull list of clearances
Tier 1Angel/0AAngel/0A
Tier 2Archangel/1BArchangel/1B
Tier 3Principal/2CPrincipal/2C
Tier 4omittedPower/3D
Tier 5omittedVirtue/4E
Tier 6Domination/5FDomination/5F
Tier 7Throne/6GThrone/6G
Tier 8omittedCherubic/7H or Cherubic/7W
Tier 9Seraphic/8XSeraphic/8X
Tier 10GodGod

Clearance-restricted information

Knowledge of many projects carried out by MJ12, and by extension UNATCO, is strictly reserved to those with an appropriate security clearance. One such example of this is Project Dibbuk, which developed a stealth helicopter to be used during covert Majestic 12 operations. As outlined in the books on the project, it is restricted to those with Domination/5F clearance or higher. The end product of this project was the SH-187 stealth helicopter. Similarly, knowledge of the killswitches in mechanically augmented agents of UNATCO is divulged only to those with at least Throne/6G clearance. As Jaime Reyes does not have this clearance, he is promptly informed that he is not permitted access to information concerning the killswitch mechanism.

Data related to nano-augmentations is not widely distributed by MJ12; even JC Denton is refused information about his own augmentations as his clearance is not high enough. In the Liberty Island MJ12 lab, access to augmentation canisters is given only to authorized personnel with Domination/5F clearance. Knowledge of nano-augmented agents' killswitches, like those of their mechanically augmented colleagues, is also clearance-restricted. The existence of the killswitch is known by a very few people, including Joseph Manderley, Walton Simons and later, Jaime Reyes. According to Paul Denton, a person must have God clearance to know about the mechanism of the killswitch. However, it appears that Reyes is eventually granted knowledge of how it works as Simons asks him to evaluate the functionality of JC's killswitch.

Most MJ12 facilities are accessible only to those with a high enough clearance. These include the Majestic 12 facility in the sewers of Hell's Kitchen, the VersaLife labs in Hong Kong, and Area 51. Area 51, and more specifically, Sector 4, is described as a Seraphic/8X facility. This makes it the most exclusive MJ12 facility as far as security clearances are concerned. This isn't surprising, as Sector 4 houses some of Majestic 12's most secretive projects such as human cloning, Universal Constructors and the potentially extraterrestrial blue fusion devices.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Majestic 12 security clearances
The Majestic 12 security clearances are various ranks that members of Majestic 12 can acquire. These ranks allow the person access to a certain amount of classified information, with more information being disclosed to them as their rank increases.

Background
After Majestic 12 broke away from the Illuminati, Bob Page decided to replace the Illuminati's "Degrees of Illuminism" with a hierarchy of security clearances. While the Degrees of Illuminism were apparently based in mysticism and religious symbolism, and seemed to be modeled on the Allied Masonic Degrees of the Freemasons, Page implemented a standardized, secular system that could be used throughout MJ12. UNATCO, in particular, uses Majestic 12's security clearances, since the Coalition is effectively MJ12's military branch; most of its personnel are unaware of their true employer, or even that it exists.

Ironically, as Stanton Dowd comments, Page's names for these new, secular security clearances came from Christian theology. Specifically, MJ12's clearances correspond directly to the hierarchy of angels established by Thomas Aquinas, a personal icon to Page. The security clearances provide an incentive for MJ12 members to remain loyal to the organization. Recruits know that if they perform well, they will be rewarded with advancements "through the layers of secrecy".

Structure
Although it is clear that the names of the security clearances are based on Aquinas' angelic hierarchy, not all of the clearance levels are named in Deus Ex. The column on the left shows the ranks mentioned in the game, while the one on the right fills the unknown with speculation based on Aquinas' hierarchy and examples seen in-game.

RankingClearances appearing in Deus ExFull list of clearances
Tier 1Angel/0AAngel/0A
Tier 2Archangel/1BArchangel/1B
Tier 3Principal/2CPrincipal/2C
Tier 4omittedPower/3D
Tier 5omittedVirtue/4E
Tier 6Domination/5FDomination/5F
Tier 7Throne/6GThrone/6G
Tier 8omittedCherubic/7H or Cherubic/7W
Tier 9Seraphic/8XSeraphic/8X
Tier 10GodGod
Clearance-restricted information


Knowledge of many projects carried out by MJ12, and by extension UNATCO, is strictly reserved to those with an appropriate security clearance. One such example of this is Project Dibbuk, which developed a stealth helicopter to be used during covert Majestic 12 operations. As outlined in the books on the project, it is restricted to those with Domination/5F clearance or higher. The end product of this project was the SH-187 stealth helicopter. Similarly, knowledge of the killswitches in mechanically augmented agents of UNATCO is divulged only to those with at least Throne/6G clearance. As Jaime Reyes does not have this clearance, he is promptly informed that he is not permitted access to information concerning the killswitch mechanism.

Data related to nano-augmentations is not widely distributed by MJ12; even JC Denton is refused information about his own augmentations as his clearance is not high enough. In the Liberty Island MJ12 lab, access to augmentation canisters is given only to authorized personnel with Domination/5F clearance. Knowledge of nano-augmented agents' killswitches, like those of their mechanically augmented colleagues, is also clearance-restricted. The existence of the killswitch is known by a very few people, including Joseph Manderley, Walton Simons and later, Jaime Reyes. According to Paul Denton, a person must have God clearance to know about the mechanism of the killswitch. However, it appears that Reyes is eventually granted knowledge of how it works as Simons asks him to evaluate the functionality of JC's killswitch.

Most MJ12 facilities are accessible only to those with a high enough clearance. These include the Majestic 12 facility in the sewers of Hell's Kitchen, the VersaLife labs in Hong Kong, and Area 51. Area 51, and more specifically, Sector 4, is described as a Seraphic/8X facility. This makes it the most exclusive MJ12 facility as far as security clearances are concerned. This isn't surprising, as Sector 4 houses some of Majestic 12's most secretive projects such as human cloning, Universal Constructors and the potentially extraterrestrial blue fusion devices.
oh dear.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Majestic 12 security clearances
The Majestic 12 security clearances are various ranks that members of Majestic 12 can acquire. These ranks allow the person access to a certain amount of classified information, with more information being disclosed to them as their rank increases.

Background
After Majestic 12 broke away from the Illuminati, Bob Page decided to replace the Illuminati's "Degrees of Illuminism" with a hierarchy of security clearances. While the Degrees of Illuminism were apparently based in mysticism and religious symbolism, and seemed to be modeled on the Allied Masonic Degrees of the Freemasons, Page implemented a standardized, secular system that could be used throughout MJ12. UNATCO, in particular, uses Majestic 12's security clearances, since the Coalition is effectively MJ12's military branch; most of its personnel are unaware of their true employer, or even that it exists.

Ironically, as Stanton Dowd comments, Page's names for these new, secular security clearances came from Christian theology. Specifically, MJ12's clearances correspond directly to the hierarchy of angels established by Thomas Aquinas, a personal icon to Page. The security clearances provide an incentive for MJ12 members to remain loyal to the organization. Recruits know that if they perform well, they will be rewarded with advancements "through the layers of secrecy".

Structure
Although it is clear that the names of the security clearances are based on Aquinas' angelic hierarchy, not all of the clearance levels are named in Deus Ex. The column on the left shows the ranks mentioned in the game, while the one on the right fills the unknown with speculation based on Aquinas' hierarchy and examples seen in-game.

RankingClearances appearing in Deus ExFull list of clearances
Tier 1Angel/0AAngel/0A
Tier 2Archangel/1BArchangel/1B
Tier 3Principal/2CPrincipal/2C
Tier 4omittedPower/3D
Tier 5omittedVirtue/4E
Tier 6Domination/5FDomination/5F
Tier 7Throne/6GThrone/6G
Tier 8omittedCherubic/7H or Cherubic/7W
Tier 9Seraphic/8XSeraphic/8X
Tier 10GodGod
Clearance-restricted information


Knowledge of many projects carried out by MJ12, and by extension UNATCO, is strictly reserved to those with an appropriate security clearance. One such example of this is Project Dibbuk, which developed a stealth helicopter to be used during covert Majestic 12 operations. As outlined in the books on the project, it is restricted to those with Domination/5F clearance or higher. The end product of this project was the SH-187 stealth helicopter. Similarly, knowledge of the killswitches in mechanically augmented agents of UNATCO is divulged only to those with at least Throne/6G clearance. As Jaime Reyes does not have this clearance, he is promptly informed that he is not permitted access to information concerning the killswitch mechanism.

Data related to nano-augmentations is not widely distributed by MJ12; even JC Denton is refused information about his own augmentations as his clearance is not high enough. In the Liberty Island MJ12 lab, access to augmentation canisters is given only to authorized personnel with Domination/5F clearance. Knowledge of nano-augmented agents' killswitches, like those of their mechanically augmented colleagues, is also clearance-restricted. The existence of the killswitch is known by a very few people, including Joseph Manderley, Walton Simons and later, Jaime Reyes. According to Paul Denton, a person must have God clearance to know about the mechanism of the killswitch. However, it appears that Reyes is eventually granted knowledge of how it works as Simons asks him to evaluate the functionality of JC's killswitch.

Most MJ12 facilities are accessible only to those with a high enough clearance. These include the Majestic 12 facility in the sewers of Hell's Kitchen, the VersaLife labs in Hong Kong, and Area 51. Area 51, and more specifically, Sector 4, is described as a Seraphic/8X facility. This makes it the most exclusive MJ12 facility as far as security clearances are concerned. This isn't surprising, as Sector 4 houses some of Majestic 12's most secretive projects such as human cloning, Universal Constructors and the potentially extraterrestrial blue fusion devices.
That's a video game. "the game follows JC Denton, an agent of the fictional agency United Nations Anti-Terrorist Coalition (UNATCO), who is given superhuman abilities by nanotechnology, as he sets out to combat hostile forces in a world ravaged by inequality and a deadly plague. His missions entangle him in a conspiracy that brings him into conflict with the Triads, Majestic 12, and the Illuminati. "

It actually sounds kind of fun, but I never got past Super Mario Brothers and don't have the time for stuff like that. Maybe when I get older I'll have the time for it. Like maybe when I'm 120.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Agreed. When we find ways to define and measure consciousness, we will make progress in understanding it. As with meditation, men of science scoffed at the stories of practitioners. It took time to develop the tools and methods needed to produce objective evidence that confirmed what was already known by people who weren't versed, bound or hampered by the scientific method. Then again, there are many beliefs that prove to be false. The benefits of meditation were hiding among others, like, say, the healing power of crystals. Sorting them out take time. I think what we are discussing are the kinds of data that drives investigations. Some investigations are based on false assumptions. Sometimes, learning enough to disprove a theory gains us the knowledge to propose a better one. To discard an observation because it conflicts with one's sense of what is proper about science would be a waste if it turned out to be true.
This smart lady disposes of quantum mechanics and consciousness pretty quickly and humorously, right down to those microtubular things...


Consciousness and Quantum Mechanics: How are they related?
 

printer

Well-Known Member
That's a video game. "the game follows JC Denton, an agent of the fictional agency United Nations Anti-Terrorist Coalition (UNATCO), who is given superhuman abilities by nanotechnology, as he sets out to combat hostile forces in a world ravaged by inequality and a deadly plague. His missions entangle him in a conspiracy that brings him into conflict with the Triads, Majestic 12, and the Illuminati. "

It actually sounds kind of fun, but I never got past Super Mario Brothers and don't have the time for stuff like that. Maybe when I get older I'll have the time for it. Like maybe when I'm 120.
An alternative reality can be fun for people. In my case I smoke something and watch a movie.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
This smart lady disposes of quantum mechanics and consciousness pretty quickly and humorously, right down to those microtubular things...


Consciousness and Quantum Mechanics: How are they related?
I particularly like the way she dismissed people's theories about consciousness "collapsing the wave" by saying it overcomplicates the mathematics. Am I wrong in interpreting what she said as saying that this is a model and all models are wrong, use your common sense too? Just because one may interpret the mathematics of the model to predict a wildly unreasonable outcome, don't trust the model, trust what you know.

I like how people are trying to devise experiments to test these wild ideas. I hope the don't put too many resources into them but maybe some young Phd candidate will go on and do some good work after getting their doctorate thesis funded to test one of them. And maybe they will get laid because what they are doing is more fun to talk about at parties than describing an experiment based on hard science. The world needs more scientists, you know.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
I have a interesting experience in consciousness that I am not sure I mentioned here, something that can make me seem like a crackpot. I have no way to explain it other than at the time it seemed real. And no, I was not drunk or stoned at the time. In the afternoon on a bike ride I stopped in a place where I knew a few people that worked there. Told the one woman I was just riding by and stopped to say hi, the doors were wide open. She introduced me to another woman, I turned to face her and when our eyes met the world disappeared and I was falling down a deep dark well. When I got to the bottom there was a little light that you would get from a candle, my showing up caused something like a spotlight to shine on a little girl playing with a rag doll. She looked up and seemed puzzled for a moment to see me. I got the feeling I was the first 'person' to show up in this far away place.

Then the physical side of me thought I should break her gaze, the other woman is sure to notice if we kept it up. Another minute of small talk and then I said I will come back later that night. After her shift she came over to talk to me. She said something that you really do not tell people the first day you meet them. She said, "I was raped as a kid." I said "That is OK. (as in we will deal with it." Sadly I did not get to know her after this, not relevant to this discussion anyway. Years later when talking to another woman employed there that I was friends with I found out the two of them were best friends and used to live together. I told her what happened back then, she said she was never knew about what happened to her when she was a kid.

I have no idea what this woman experienced when I had my bizarre moment. Would love to know, sure would be of interest to the discussion. Or it was just something that misfiring neurons made up in my head. Not the only time reality seemed less real, had another incident but a few decades later. So the door is open for me on what consciousness is. I have no way to explain the incident. I am not one to believe in spooks, things that go bump in the night, while I think I am a morale person I am in no way spiritual. I do realize that when a man and woman find each other attractive their pupils dilate and this makes the other person feel wanted causing theirs's to dilate also. I can explain away the second incident, the first, not so much. Makes you wonder.
 

CCGNZ

Well-Known Member
How about links? We all do them to get on the same page. I see a number of links I can click on with the first terms.


found it,


OK, where is this from? There is no links or reference where this originated. Could even have been me!
Sorry ,I'm not computer savy,don't even have a IPhone,I just found that info,I'd seen it before,and already claimed I have no idea if it's authentic,could or couldn't be true,did my best to describe how I found it.
 
Top