Switching to LED from HPS

ANC

Well-Known Member
There are about 3 LEDs worth looking into and only the top Bins on those.
THose would be the new Nichias and the LM301 and 561Cs that many of us use.
If it doesn't some on something with a Genuine Samsung logo, keep on looking.
 

Kingrow1

Well-Known Member
There are about 3 LEDs worth looking into and only the top Bins on those.
THose would be the new Nichias and the LM301 and 561Cs that many of us use.
If it doesn't some on something with a Genuine Samsung logo, keep on looking.
The best leds are very intresting, tone down their claims and price and you might have a hobby market worth a damn around them...
 

Flowki

Well-Known Member
The OP isn't looking for the best money can buy though, he says over and over he is short on money and simply cant cool his light without AC and thus has a large power bill. He wants to buy a old tech led using almost the exact same number of watts. Did you look at the led he wants? It's over 5 years old. I'm not hating on LEDs outright, I even recommended quantum board for fucks sake. And I've said over and over cooling a hps is not hard, it just takes learning how to do, and as soon as you do it's very simple. I've even said how to do it a few times I believe. Fans. Moving air. Using ducted hoods.
Since you dont seem to have read much of what's been written I dont get why your even trying to talk about hps in this thread.
They op is trying to SAVE MONEY. Let's help him actually do that.
HPS throws out a lot of wasted light > heat in traditional growing. That wasted heat then requires extra W to take care of it. That's not saving money, that's wasting money. If he wants to save money then he needs to go vert. The reduction in light waste and increase in yield will justify the added climate control W use.

If he must do flat scrog style growing then no.. hps is not saving money, it's wasting it like a mother fucker in a gay bar. He'd be better off keeping his current climate control and investing in a single cmh or 400W of cob.
 

Flowki

Well-Known Member
led users use this site any which way so therefore i am not upsetting the balance.

If leds are that great then why has the UK pulled out of them, every hydro shop here thats good discontinued them and said they might look again one day when they stop bullshitting us all, this disclaimer written on three of the biggest hydro stores here.

Again its simply your word and i am always waiting for those that can actually delve deeper into the science not shut up shop and leave it at a lot of confusion.

It can go on until you realise that its nothing really to do with hps but simply the bs claims the led users have made all over this site, youd think they would keep that crap to their sub forum...
That's more to do with the ridicules prices. They also stopped stocking cmh as much, not because it's bad.. but because the 1k price tag for a needlessly over engineered hood put every body off, other than dumb fks with deep pockets..
 

Flowki

Well-Known Member
Make sure you also read my comment above this one... but jesus christ man your failure to understand is amazing.. you have a agenda to push LEDs it seems like cuz your missing where I said in like the 2nd post of this thread that only the current gen LEDs are any good such as the quantum boards. For fuck sake this is exactly why I doubt your ability to understand. You dont read shit and you make a comment that doesn't represent the topic.
My ability to understand is fine. I've understood the OP from the start and I am telling him to bite the bullet and invest in better lighting if he can. If he can't, drop to 400hps. Why upgrade climate to use a 600hps in it's least most efficient growing style. That is the opposite of helping or saving money.
 

growingforfun

Well-Known Member
HPS throws out a lot of wasted light > heat in traditional growing. That wasted heat then requires extra W to take care of it. That's not saving money, that's wasting money. If he wants to save money then he needs to go vert. The reduction in light waste and increase in yield will justify the added climate control W use.

If he must do flat scrog style growing then no.. hps is not saving money, it's wasting it like a mother fucker in a gay bar. He'd be better off keeping his current climate control and investing in a single cmh or 400W of cob.
It really sounds like your opinions are based on personal failure and a unwillingness to learn how to use your equipment.
 

Kingrow1

Well-Known Member
My ability to understand is fine. I've understood the OP from the start and I am telling him to bite the bullet and invest in better lighting if he can. If he can't, drop to 400hps. Why upgrade climate to use a 600hps in it's least most efficient growing style. That is the opposite of helping or saving money.
I like the idea to drop wattage, couple of 250w hps over a larger area...
 

Kingrow1

Well-Known Member
It really sounds like your opinions are based on personal failure and a unwillingness to learn how to use your equipment.
No hes a good grower just an inability to see past the recent led cmh tech confusion.

In reality it happens all to easy with weed markets, Boveda and there users were convincing everyone weed taste shit unless its cured and you need boveda packs to cure properly. It wasnt plesant for some to point out that weed dosent need curing and smokes fine with just a dry.

Its endless here :-)
 

Kushash

Well-Known Member
No hes a good grower just an inability to see past the recent led cmh tech confusion.

In reality it happens all to easy with weed markets, Boveda and there users were convincing everyone weed taste shit unless its cured and you need boveda packs to cure properly. It wasnt plesant for some to point out that weed dosent need curing and smokes fine with just a dry.

Its endless here :-)
Especially when it's water only for the last 4 or 5 weeks lol.

I know you have seen a lot here.
Have you ever seen something like this? A cannabis plant develops extremely shiny leaves when bone dry in the morning a few hours after it is lights on (12/12 600w hortilux) and then the shine went away a few hours after the plant was watered. Several hours later it was back to normal. It has been normal since.
Not something I've seen before but I'm sure it is a normal plant reaction. It is also slightly high in N and that may be a factor.
Just looking for someone who has seen or heard of the same thing happening.
If your interested in pictures here is the link.
https://www.rollitup.org/t/shiny-leaves-good-or-bad-problem-idk-what-caused-it-idk.968425/
 

Flowki

Well-Known Member
No hes a good grower just an inability to see past the recent led cmh tech confusion.

In reality it happens all to easy with weed markets, Boveda and there users were convincing everyone weed taste shit unless its cured and you need boveda packs to cure properly. It wasnt plesant for some to point out that weed dosent need curing and smokes fine with just a dry.

Its endless here :-)
''led'' is confusing as it is used in a very loose term, so I always try to be clear by differentiating CMH and COB as good lighting, I'd also say QB is good.. I have not used it but enough solid sources have. They do seem to get bundled in with cheap blurple shit or over hyped ''400w led is as good as 1k hps'' scams. And that's not to say the decent cob/cmh kit/bulbs are free from crazy over priced shit.. but neither is hps.

I think we've already been over this ground, hps takes a lot of environment and canopy manipulation to get the best out of. Just because it's harder to master, does not make it better. If only..
 
Last edited:

Kingrow1

Well-Known Member
I just think that at present a watt of power produces the same yeild regardless of light type. 100watts of led is easily rivaled by 100watts of t5's, 600watts of hps is easily rivaled by 600watts of t5's.

One watt per gram four weeks veg on a quick indica still seems about right for most lights give or take :-)




''led'' is confusing as it is used in a very loose term, so I always try to be clear by differentiating CMH and COB as good lighting, I'd also say QB is good.. I have not used it but enough solid sources have. They do seem to get bundled in with cheap blurple shit or over hyped ''400w led is as good as 1k hps'' scams. And that's not to say the decent cob/cmh kit/bulbs are free from crazy over priced shit.. but neither is hps.

I think we've already been over this ground, hps takes a lot of environment and canopy manipulation to get the best out of. Just because it's harder to master, does not make it better. If only..
 

Stipulus

Well-Known Member
The 600 watt hps is too expensive so your going to go BUY 580 watt worth of led? You'll save 20 watts and have another upfront cost.

Have you worked out the math for what it costs to run by looking up what you pay per kwh? A 600w hps should be pretty easy to keep cool just running it at night so you shouldn't be needing a AC...
Thats bollocks...what he has listed is the amount of light energy output from the LED lights...not the draw, the draw will easily be half of a 600 HPS
 

Lucky Luke

Well-Known Member
HPS throws out a lot of wasted light > heat in traditional growing. That wasted heat then requires extra W to take care of it. That's not saving money, that's wasting money. If he wants to save money then he needs to go vert. The reduction in light waste and increase in yield will justify the added climate control W use.

If he must do flat scrog style growing then no.. hps is not saving money, it's wasting it like a mother fucker in a gay bar. He'd be better off keeping his current climate control and investing in a single cmh or 400W of cob.
Bull shit. Im in Australia and I can run HPS all year round without AC. You don't HAVE to use ac. Its a bloody weed and takes high temps well enough when using air movement. Air movement is the number two key to a grow right after H2o

I run HPS and CFL in winter to SAVE money on heating. That's right it saves me money in winter over LED.

Im not bagging LED, LED is bloody awesome and I use an LED light for propagation and in summer as a veg light but all of our environments are different from each other.
 

ANC

Well-Known Member
If you have floor space a 600W HPS is more efficient than a 400 or a 1000W.
If you have floor space and money for electricity, throw down as many quanta of photons as you can (provided they hit plant canopy).
 
Top