skunkushybrid
New Member
First page to last. Have you satisfied yourself?![]()
If you mean am I satisfied that seeds are predisposed to be one sex or the other then, yes... although I have been satisfied of that for a long time before this thread.
First page to last. Have you satisfied yourself?![]()
Hey, I remember back on Overgrow there was a thread which was about how you could sex seeds (now if this article were true this would be presuming that seeds are pre-determined). I can't remember the exact details, but it was something like if there was a hole/dip in the tip of the seed, or something like a coconut then the seed was either male/female. Sorry.. .stoner brain,I can't remember the details
I had saved the photo, but lost it when OG went down. I've searched over the net since for it, but never been able to find it. Anyone ever seen/heard anything about it?
The plants sex is NOT predetermined from seed. environmental factors play a huge roll in sexing a plant. It is evolution. survival of the species. Red light will make a plant think it doesn't have enouph time to mature into a budding plant so it becomes a male. its no secret that males flower before females.but it wouldn't suprise me if skunk wants to argue that too. george cervantes and a group of scientists funded by dutch passion seed company proved this theory over thousands of tests. heres what they came up with.
Environmental factors don't begin influencing your plants sex until there are 3 pairs of true leaves.(not counting cotyledons)
1)higher nitrogen levels during the first two weeks of vegging makes more female plants.
2)lower temps increase the ammount of female plants
3)high humidity increases the number of female plants
4)low growing medium moisture increases male tendencies
5)blue light (MH) increases the chances of a female. choose a red light(hps) for males
6)fewer hours of daylight increases the ammount of females (14 hours)
this information was taken from Henk's archives. the owner of dutch passion seeds
Personally I think seeds are pre-determined from the moment of pollenation. A bit like having a baby, the sex of the baby is determined the moment the egg and sperm meet and the cells divide. An embryo/baby generally doesn't change sex halfway through gestation.
I don't think a seed is pre-disposed to be one sex or the other, I think that moment decided the instant that piece of pollen falls on the stigma of the pistil of the female preflower.
Of course I have no proof of this, but then how can anyone prove that they're able to change the sex of their seeds to female?
I used to grow 18/6 and a year ago starting growing 24/0 .. I still get a general 50/50 ratio with seeds germed.
All those other people who do this for a living have no idea what they are talking about. right?
It is NOTHING like having a baby.
That's where you're wrong... plants are very similar to mammals, and in this respect (breeding) plants are more similar to humans than we are to birds.
Yes, but these are myths spread by very respected breeders. They say, "red light causes more males" they say "24/0 causes more males".
Yet, on this site people regularly feed these myths. Do a certain thing with your lights and you get more fem's. Yeah right. I'm not convinced.
So you expect people to wade through a whole book to get to the 'truth'... why don't you just cut n paste the 'truth' for us all to see?
Plants are more like mammals when it comes to breeding and the transferrance of genetic code than mammals are to birds... fact, in fact it's only just been recently discovered.
If your interest in cannabis stretched as far and wide as mine then maybe you would be up to spec. too...
its on page 20 . you are talking about something different now. either you are confusing yourself or you are trying to confuse your subscribers.
I agree that the whole theory is seriously flawed,i'd love to see a few peer reviewed white papers devoted to this subject.
There has to be some half crazed botanist somewhere who researched the shit out of this i would think.
its on page 20 . you are talking about something different now. either you are confusing yourself or you are trying to confuse your subscribers.
Well here you go Mr. Always right about everything no matter what evidence is brought forth God-like mod. This was published by a group of scientists who tested the theories of environmental factors affecting the sex of cannabis strains. Some real scientific evidence, not the horseshit plastered all over your own site.
Proceedings of the XLV Italian Society of Agricultural Genetics - SIGA Annual Congress
Salsomaggiore Terme, Italy - 26/29 September, 2001
ISBN 88-900622-1-5
Oral Communication Abstract
SEARCH FOR THE GENES INVOLVED IN SEXUAL DIFFERENTIATION OF CANNABIS SATIVA L.
MOLITERNI V.M.C.*, CATTIVELLI L.**, MANDOLINO G.*, RANALLI P.*
* Istituto Sperimentale per le Colture Industriali. Via di Corticella 133, 40129 Bologna
[email protected]
** Istituto Sperimentale per la Cerealicoltiura, Sezione di Fiorenzuola d'Arda, Via S. Protaso 302, Fiorenzuola d'Arda, Piacenza
Cannabis sativa L., sexual differentiation, cDNA AFLP
Cannabis sativa is a naturally dioecious species with heterogametic males ( 2n = 18+XY ) and homogametic females ( 2n = 18+XX ). The sexual differentiation of C. sativa is strongly influenced by environmental factors such as temperature and photoperiod. Anomalies also occur in floral development like the presence of reproductive structures of the opposite sex, or the development of bisexual inflorescences (monoecious phenotype).
By means of optical microscopy, we have identified the earliest step of apex sexual differentiation as the leaves of the fourth node rise on. More than 50% of the samples observed at this stage have indeed developed some floral meristem buds.
In order to identify the genes involved in these earliests stages of the sexual differentiation of C. sativa, we have carried out an analysis of gene expression by means of the cDNA AFLP technique. Apices from the fourth node of male and female plants, grown in controlled conditions were collected, than the mRNA was extracted and used as template for the cDNA synthesis. Double stranded cDNA was digested with the restriction enzymes BstY1 and Mse1. Analysis of amplified fragments obtained using 60 combinations of the BstY+1 and Mse+3 primers enabled us to identify few hundreds of fragments with an apparent differential expression in male and female samples. In order to verify their actual differential expression, these fragments were eluted from the gel and re-amplified with the same primers combinations that were used to generate them. Subsequently they were blotted in double copies and than hybridised respectively with the total cDNA from males and females apices collected at the fourth node. This approach allowed the reduction of the fragments number to 12. Subcloning and sequencing will permit to track back to the genes having a differential expression at this stage of sexual development of C. sativa and that may be involved in its regulation.
Did you want me to rephrase all that so you can understand it in low-level IQ terms, or can you manage to read it?