Obamas Buddies at ACORN!

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Han with you it always comes down to this. Anytime someone disagrees with you you instantly jump up and down crying that they are republicans, as if only republicans could ever disagree with you, as if your ideas are so good, that only a republican who's supposed job it is to disagree with any left/liberal/democratic ideas automatically regardless of their merit. Its not the Republicans, its people in general who disagree with you.
I guess using commi, naiz, fascist, socialist, is all fine right?

I mean seriously people, you should know that you are fighting the republican agenda. You are not fighting a libertarian agenda, because they are not going to benefit from any of this. At least I am willing to call it what it is. I would like to pretend that I am a independent but for real that is not the case, because guess what, we don't have a 3 party system.

You all saying that you are 'libertarians' or w/e is nothing more than a copout. If you vote, it will most likely be for a republican. And like I have constantly said time and time again, republicans and dems are essentially the same, minus human rights issues.



But I guess I shouldn't call someone out for singling me out, and then not using anything that comes close to what I have been saying. What agenda am I supposedly fighting for? Truth in news?

If these were oil industry folks... no one would be saying ... yah it's just them... it doesn't come from the top......................right?

Careful, ur hypocrisy is showing.......
Depends on the situation CJ, I have no problem looking at it as a few bad eggs and not a systemic issue that spawns from the top. I would have no problem saying that say the assholes that jacked up gas prices to $4 a gallon the days after 9/11 had nothing to do with mobile as a whole.


You are way off on your take on this. ACORN is at all levels a radical organization that is based on racism and class warfare. Their goal is income redistribution by any means necessary. Furthermore, they are not a legitimate business with a bad employee or two, they have been known to be corrupt and have had numerous employees convicted of very serious crimes.
Besides the right wing media, what do you have to go off of them being a radical organization that is based on racism? I mean seriously because they help out poor innercity communities that are moslty black, they are racists?

They may be, but really what evidence do you have?


As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, they did catch a lot of flack for protecting priests that were accused of child molestation. If you ever watch O'rielly, you would know that he led the charge in going after these priests and those that covered up their actions. Nobody defended the Church - what they did was called for a proper investigation. But then again, the Church was never given millions of tax dollars were they.
What about the abortion clinic bombings? Or killing of the doctor?

BTW, for all those following this, both the House and Senate have voted to cut all public funding from ACORN. I guess all those Senators and Congressmen are as dumb as I am according to Hanimmal.
You really should try to read peoples post. I know that this is not how they do it on Fox, but seriously. I have repeatedly said that I do not care about Acorn one way or another. I just am sick of the news reporting stuff that has no fact checking and is very irresponsible journalism.


You guys are not even registering that their last Acorn expose' that Beck went all off about Acorn employees killing their husbands, was a joke on the filmmakers. And Beck took that ball and ran with it, but you don't really care about that. You want the truth, but only when it is your idealistic view of what it is. And if in the name of that truth you have bad story after bad story that ruins peoples lives, so be it, as long as you get yours.
 

CrackerJax

New Member
I mean seriously people, you should know that you are fighting the republican agenda. You are not fighting a libertarian agenda, because they are not going to benefit from any of this. At least I am willing to call it what it is. I would like to pretend that I am a independent but for real that is not the case, because guess what, we don't have a 3 party system.
I am certainly not fighting for a republican agenda. I am fighting for fiscal responsibility. I am fighting for following the constitution.... the document which got us all here in the first place with such a largess. Some ppl don't appreciate that fact. A lot of ppl gave their lives so we can enjoy this country. Our hard earned prosperity shouldn't be something casually spilled away. There is NO crisis. So what's the hurry, other than the bill being a complete sham.



Depends on the situation CJ, I have no problem looking at it as a few bad eggs and not a systemic issue that spawns from the top. I would have no problem saying that say the assholes that jacked up gas prices to $4 a gallon the days after 9/11 had nothing to do with mobile as a whole.
Oh, I have to call Shenanigans on this one!!! :mrgreen: SHENANIGANS Mr. Bar Brady!!
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
I am certainly not fighting for a republican agenda. I am fighting for fiscal responsibility. I am fighting for following the constitution.... the document which got us all here in the first place with such a largess. Some ppl don't appreciate that fact. A lot of ppl gave their lives so we can enjoy this country. Our hard earned prosperity shouldn't be something casually spilled away. There is NO crisis. So what's the hurry, other than the bill being a complete sham.
But is it fiscally responsible for people to continue to not pay for their health care? And to allow so many bad practices in prescribing?

Or unnecessary surgeries, just to get paid?

These things need to change. Just because someone doesn't want to change this, doesn't mean that it is not the best fiscal decision.

http://www.naturalnews.com/012291.html
An estimated 7.5 million unnecessary medical and surgical procedures are performed each year, writes Gary Null, PhD., in Death by Medicine.
Now I don't know who this guy is, but this number is similar to the ones that I have seen before. I was looking for the knee surgery that have been shown to not have any benefit but the doctors that specialize in it make $300,000+ a year doing them, so of course they don't want to be a general practice doctor and only make $200,000 a year.

But that 7.5million, lets take that to 5 million in unnecessary procedures, and at $5k a pop that is $25 billion dollars a year. Add in over prescribing, and all the other waste in administrative costs, extra unneeded tests, ect. And that is fiscally responsible. Add into that people finally having to pay for themselves and you are now fiscally responsible. Toss in some tort reform and you got a winner.

Doing nothing and just screaming about it being unconstitutional is not fiscally responsible.

Oh, I have to call Shenanigans on this one!!! :mrgreen: SHENANIGANS Mr. Bar Brady!!
Really? See I think of it like the republican party (or independents, libertarians, w/e). I think that there are a good percent that are racist, but that does not mean that I think all of them are racist, infact I think that the majority are not. Same with Acorn, I am sure there are a good percent that are crooks, but that doesn't mean that I have to think that they are all crooks.

Unlike a lot of people in this forum and the religion forum, I am open to all possibilities, and don't deal in absolutes very often. I am open to changing my mind, but that doesn't mean that I will always just give in with little to no facts or evidence. I go with the best information and most persuasive logic.

And even then I know that there can be two right answers. To say that one thing cannot possibly work, because this can is stupid. Discarding the entire insurance network and just having medical treatment paid directly to the hospital could work, but to do that would leave the entire country in disarray for generations until we could figure out how to do it.

Likewise going directly to single payer could work. But all the americans that have their money invested in insurance comapnies would completely dismantle the financial system in the short term. And I don't think that it is necessary.
 

RickWhite

Well-Known Member
Guys at this point we need to ask ourselves the following question:

"If a stranger came along would they be able to tell which one of you was the idiot?"
 

doobnVA

Well-Known Member
Guys at this point we need to ask ourselves the following question:

"If a stranger came along would they be able to tell which one of you was the idiot?"

Ask yourself this then:

If the stranger himself is an idiot, does his opinion really matter?
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Posts by Rick White:

Guys at this point we need to ask ourselves the following question:

"If a stranger came along would they be able to tell which one of you was the idiot?"
All O'reilly ever does is speaks truth and common sense. I don't agree with him on everything - his harping on the Mexican border and saying "Marry Christmas" gets a little annoying, but he is on for 5 hours every week so he needs some filler material. You have to take that for what it is.

But aside from that if you hate O'reilly it has to be because you just don't like hearing the truth. And Glenn Beck is a genius - maybe try listening with an open mind...God forbid. But I am sure if I was closed minded and there was someone who just obliterated my ideas the way these guys do to the ideas of the Left I guess I would get mad too. Too bad more people aren't willing to listen with an open mind, they just might learn something.
I have never wished death on anyone but I would seriously enjoy seeing Michael Moore beheaded on the internet.
You are way off on your take on this. ACORN is at all levels a radical organization that is based on racism and class warfare. Their goal is income redistribution by any means necessary. Furthermore, they are not a legitimate business with a bad employee or two, they have been known to be corrupt and have had numerous employees convicted of very serious crimes.

As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, they did catch a lot of flack for protecting priests that were accused of child molestation. If you ever watch O'rielly, you would know that he led the charge in going after these priests and those that covered up their actions. Nobody defended the Church - what they did was called for a proper investigation. But then again, the Church was never given millions of tax dollars were they.

BTW, for all those following this, both the House and Senate have voted to cut all public funding from ACORN. I guess all those Senators and Congressmen are as dumb as I am according to Hanimmal.
But just as posted above, Liberals really don't care about the facts on the ground, they are only concerned with having the opinions that they think will make people look at them favorably - that is the true motive of the Liberal mind.

Read some of the above posts and read between the lines. "The only people who care about ACORN are those that watch Fox News." In other words, the only people who care that tax dollars are going to aid in the trafficking of child sex slaves watch Fox News? So what do other people care about. Well, they care about being socially aligned with pop culture celebrities more than anything, and being of the same mindset in accomplishes this in their minds.
Because far Left radicals have infiltrated our educational institutions and have been very effective at convincing people through indoctrination to shut their brains off and blindly toe the party line regardless of the facts.
(About me) This is the kind of person society is creating these days. We are in serious trouble.

You have some serious issues with Democrats. I would suggest that you take a step back breath, and then try to realize that not everyone is out to get you, with the main evidence of such being that Fox news has told you so.

Dems are not trying to turn this country into the USSR, they are just trying to take care of the things that have long been pushed aside in the name of capitalism. Over the last 40 years how many things do you think have been designed that actually helps you out in life? Now how many do you think has been done to help out companies?

Now I am not obtuse enough to think that what is good for companies is not going to benefit the people, but at some point you need to focus in on the people that are being missed with this, because they still are here.

Money into infrastructure may seem like a waste, but really it is an investment.

A healthy, educated, mobile, happy workforce is like a oil change for the country. If we are able to take care of businesses we should be able to do the same for our people.

I feel like a broken record sometimes, but 1-25 we should be working on education. This is the building of the base of our economy. If people in these ages work hard they will be the ones that push the envelope in the future.

25-65 are the workers. This 40 years are when they will earn the most, they are the best educated and experienced and have the reigns of the country. They are in the drivers seat. And yes financially they are responsible for all the people that are in the first 25 years of their life, and the last 15.

65-80 (+). These are the people that paid for everything that the 25-65 crowd enjoyed, education, roads, medicine, everything. If these people did not work their asses off for the country, the 25-65 crowd would not be able to make what they do.

The middle 40 years are when we work the hardest, we pay the most, and get back the least. But when you step back and look at the fact that we benefitted from it the first 25 years (unless you have great family connections and got a great job the taxes you pay do nothing to pay for your schooling, roads, ect) and what you will receive in the last 15 years of your life.

We need to understand why things work the way that they do. Because with that understanding you can become aware that there is more to it than just 'paying for the other guy'. There is a lot to be said about spreading costs over a wide group of people.

There will always be people that take advantage of the system, but that is why reform needs to be easier. If people are doing this, then there needs to be way to fix it without all this fighting and misinformation that is going on. Why is it that any change is met with such rage?
 

RickWhite

Well-Known Member
Posts by Rick White:
















You have some serious issues with Democrats. I would suggest that you take a step back breath, and then try to realize that not everyone is out to get you, with the main evidence of such being that Fox news has told you so.

Dems are not trying to turn this country into the USSR, they are just trying to take care of the things that have long been pushed aside in the name of capitalism. Over the last 40 years how many things do you think have been designed that actually helps you out in life? Now how many do you think has been done to help out companies?

Now I am not obtuse enough to think that what is good for companies is not going to benefit the people, but at some point you need to focus in on the people that are being missed with this, because they still are here.

Money into infrastructure may seem like a waste, but really it is an investment.

A healthy, educated, mobile, happy workforce is like a oil change for the country. If we are able to take care of businesses we should be able to do the same for our people.

I feel like a broken record sometimes, but 1-25 we should be working on education. This is the building of the base of our economy. If people in these ages work hard they will be the ones that push the envelope in the future.

25-65 are the workers. This 40 years are when they will earn the most, they are the best educated and experienced and have the reigns of the country. They are in the drivers seat. And yes financially they are responsible for all the people that are in the first 25 years of their life, and the last 15.

65-80 (+). These are the people that paid for everything that the 25-65 crowd enjoyed, education, roads, medicine, everything. If these people did not work their asses off for the country, the 25-65 crowd would not be able to make what they do.

The middle 40 years are when we work the hardest, we pay the most, and get back the least. But when you step back and look at the fact that we benefitted from it the first 25 years (unless you have great family connections and got a great job the taxes you pay do nothing to pay for your schooling, roads, ect) and what you will receive in the last 15 years of your life.

We need to understand why things work the way that they do. Because with that understanding you can become aware that there is more to it than just 'paying for the other guy'. There is a lot to be said about spreading costs over a wide group of people.

There will always be people that take advantage of the system, but that is why reform needs to be easier. If people are doing this, then there needs to be way to fix it without all this fighting and misinformation that is going on. Why is it that any change is met with such rage?
Anyone who would take the time to dig up all those quotes clearly has issues. And people who feel the need to chop up posts and respond line by line are nearly always abnormally argumentative.

That being said let me briefly educate you on the reality of education.

I know several teachers with a lot of experience teaching in the City of Detroit. All of them came to realize that they are fighting a losing battle. Here is why.

In Plato's Republic he explained that the first thing required for a society to function is law and order. Without law and order education is impossible. I own a business in Detroit and I can tell you from experience (as would everyone else in the City) that the bad influences so outweigh anything good that can be accomplished with education. In fact, most teachers report that the bad influence in the child's home makes education of the child nearly impossible. Liberals have ran most inner Cities for years and they have been absolute failures. What is needed before we can even discuss education is to clean up the streets and create an orderly environment necessary for the piece of mind that is a necessary prerequisite of education.

Hanimmal, I know you think you have it all figured out but trust me, as someone who has been where you are intellectually and has gone light years further, you need to learn to be more humble about your opinions. The concept that education is the answer is fairly juvenile on the scale of intellectual development.
 

BeavTek

Well-Known Member
The best thing that obama has done so far is call Kanye West a JackAss.
I laughed my ass off when I heard that.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Anyone who would take the time to dig up all those quotes clearly has issues. And people who feel the need to chop up posts and respond line by line are nearly always abnormally argumentative.
That took all of two minutes. Was not very hard.

Your post are constantly full of anger, and you like to call people out when they are not even focused on you, and obviously watch a lot of Fox news.

The reason why I go line by line, is so that I can make sure I don't fall into the trap that you seem to enjoy. If I just pick one line that is wrong, and disregard the things that are said that are right or even a good way to look at it even if there is still room to disagree.

I am not just going to wuss out and say your whole post is wrong, by pointing to one line of a well thought out post, because the rest actually may have good points.

That being said let me briefly educate you on the reality of education.

I know several teachers with a lot of experience teaching in the City of Detroit. All of them came to realize that they are fighting a losing battle. Here is why.

In Plato's Republic he explained that the first thing required for a society to function is law and order. Without law and order education is impossible. I own a business in Detroit and I can tell you from experience (as would everyone else in the City) that the bad influences so outweigh anything good that can be accomplished with education. In fact, most teachers report that the bad influence in the child's home makes education of the child nearly impossible. Liberals have ran most inner Cities for years and they have been absolute failures. What is needed before we can even discuss education is to clean up the streets and create an orderly environment necessary for the piece of mind that is a necessary prerequisite of education.
I take it you live up around Sterling heights-Troy-Birmingham area. That is just a guess though.

Detroit is a complete mess no question, you are right the social issues there far outweigh anything good that can go on in the short term as a whole. I am sure you did not mean everyone, because there are always good kids and families, but I do know what you mean.

You say liberals, but that is not the real issue with Detroit. You have to go back to WW2. You have the middle class coming home from the war, and moving out of the cities to the suburbs, the big three were booming and everyone was doing well.

But you start to have a lot of vacant homes from this, and in the south you had a lot of poor black people that wanted out, so when Detroit started to get desperate with its vacancies they started to advertise in the south, and Ford was always known for not discriminating on hiring. So we had a huge influx of poor families replacing the middle class that was leaving.

Right there is the trend that destroyed Detroit. It had little to do with race, but everything to do with economics.

You replaced people with education, stored wealth, family ties to the areas, stability, with people that had nothing, just starting out. People that did not have any education, any stored wealth, any family ties that did not just show up to the area. How can that possibly work for the best? These people had nothing. So if you think about it they were what 20? in 1950, that would mean that they would be 80 now, so the oldest generations now. That means that their kids had very very little to work with, and they did not value education (because they were able to work without it in Detroit) so their kids did not either. So down to today's children. They are the first ones that the trend is really starting to change. People today now are starting to wake up to the fact that the only way in America to change you social level is to 1. Get educated, 2. Get lucky (or 3. Lose everything).

The tax base never recovered, and only got worse after the riots, further down in the 80's when the big three started to move out, and on. Nothing has ever really been replaced in Detroit. So the taxes drop (meaning that everything goes to crap) and desperation rises (drugs, crime, low education), and that turns into worse and worse situations for everyone there.

The only way to improve Detroit is to increase the standard of living, no amount of 'cleaning' will help out there. It is hard to do but unless it happens Detroit is screwed.

Hanimmal, I know you think you have it all figured out but trust me, as someone who has been where you are intellectually and has gone light years further, you need to learn to be more humble about your opinions. The concept that education is the answer is fairly juvenile on the scale of intellectual development.
I don't think I have it ALL figured out, but I am very well educated on the issues and constantly study up on them and am willing to see both sides. Something that your infinite knowledge has seemed to disregard.

You say it is juvenile(I love how you try to sound all high and mighty now, nice touch) but you are wrong. What is the number one investment that a person can make? It is their education. You want to see some charts?
In millions




Now we can see how education improves wealth. I am sure you can agree with that.

But how does Detroit stack up? First lets look at the trends in detroit:


Educational achievement in Detroit:


Now population rates of Detroit:


Population Growth 2007 Population Population Change Since 1990 Population Change Since 2000
Detroit, MI---------------838,521----------------- -18%------------------------------------ -12%
Michigan -----------------10,147,507------------------ 9% --------------------------------------2%
United States ---------305,316,813------------------ 23%------------------------------------- 8%



So people are leaving, who? The people that can afford to, the ones with education.
So instead of those people sticking it out in Detroit, they leave and the city does not get the benefit from them.

And I don't just mean taxes to help offset the people that don't have much. I mean the benefit of having parents in schools that are educated and helping out the children, the homelife of those children being nurturing and the benefits of those kids friends that come over and can see how a good family operates and has something to wish to achieve.

Success leads to more success. That is one of the biggest things about our society.

So even though those people are not staying in Detroit, you are saying that they are not helping society? You think that they are not paying taxes to the Fed if they move to the suburbs? We had all benefitted from them working through and persevering in Detroit getting the education that we help provide. And now they are doing their part, but just not in the city of Detroit. Because they don't have to, and there is not much opportunity there (as you should know).

If you want to fix Detroit, going after crime (which is a symptom) is like giving a cough drop to someone that has lung cancer.
The best way to fix Detroit is to get a workforce there that is educated and ready to go, only then can we start to get businesses back into Michigan, because (You remember Google a few years ago, where did they go?) without a educated workforce they will not be willing to come. How can you run a business without anyone there to work in it.

And with those tax dollars you can start to rebuild the crumbling parts of the city (or take it down). That will help clean up some of the crack dens. And with more jobs more people will be willing to move into the city, that brings up the standard of living even further. The people that don't have any education will be able to get service jobs (resturaunts, grocery store (also non-existent in Detroit), retail) so they will be more affluent and happier, schools would become safer due to parents having the understanding to care about their child's education, on and on.

It is not a fast answer, but it is the only way to deal with the cancer, and not the symptoms.

And this is with me believing that the current way we operate the schools is antiquated. We need to completely revamp the educational system, from not having 3 months off every year, to shorter days, to a much longer classes (like 2.5 hours so that they don't have to break the flow and can answer the questions, and have the kids do the work there with the teacher). On and on, not just going with something because it is the same as it has always been.



Something though to you personally. I don't think that I know everything, not even close. I try to be very humble in life and when I post. At times I do get snarky, but that is due to the constant attacks I get from people like yourself that fall back on the old standard insults. I always try to use actual sources for my information, and the strong economic and work backround that I have had in the responses that I make. But I am always willing to try to understand the people that I disagree with and try to learn from them.

You may know who Steve Fraiser is. He is from Hazel Park and won the Olympic Gold medal in '84 in wrestling. I actually had the benefit to get to train with him off and on over my career. One thing that he told me really affected me greatly. He told me to always listen to what people were saying, no matter who they were. If he was at a tourny and a 7 year old kid would come up and tell him that he was doing something wrong, he would listen, because maybe it was that 1 time out of a thousand that it was something that he could learn from. It doesn't matter if he won the gold, and this kid had only be wrestling for a year, he might have some input.

The moral is to always be willing and open to new ideas. That no matter how well versed you think you are, someone with far less knowledge can get you to look at it in a new way so that you can constantly improve. If you think you are so far above someone and refuse to actually listen you may miss out on something important. You should be open to changing your ideas, and not just attack anything that is counter your view.
 

RickWhite

Well-Known Member
The best thing that obama has done so far is call Kanye West a JackAss.
I laughed my ass off when I heard that.
I agree!

What would be even more funny is if we could read the minds of those on the far Left when they think of this. There would be this major mental conflict of a Liberal black President criticizing a Liberal black entertainer for being a douche.

I imagine smoke coming from their ears and their heads exploding.

"I'm just so confused - boom!"
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
I don't know what you think far left is, but me and my fiance' were cracking up over it. It was hilarious.
 

RickWhite

Well-Known Member
Wow Hanimmal, you did a great job of pulling all that info from the internet. Don't you find it a little odd that you would go to all that trouble? Anyway, you might want to actually read what you are posting and think about your own argument a little before just rambling it all off.

If you do, you will notice that 90% of your own argument is highly Conservative. What you inadvertently pointed out is that if an individual wants to work hard and stay out of trouble, even those from the poorest backgrounds can make it in America. And you did a good job I must say.

Where you missed the mark is in two areas. One, you conflated discussion about Government policy with a discussion about individual choices. And again, you inadvertently went from a Liberal argument to a Conservative one. The two are entirely different things.

Also, you are incorrect about how to solve the problems in Detroit where my building is located and I work 5 days a week. The horrible conditions in the city are caused by the high crime rate and corruption (also crime) which chases all the business (and money) out of the city. The crime forces every business to spend additional money on security and to incur other expenses like stolen power lines, additional vehicle expense, additional logistics cost because the nearest Office Max or Home Depot is 8-10 miles away. I could go on for pages.

Detroit does spend a lot on education but much of it gets embezzled and the rest becomes a matter of putting good money after bad because children simply can not learn in that environment. If you live in the area get in your car and drive into the ghetto neighborhoods and think to yourself what it would be like to grow up there. The whole city looks like it was carpet bombed several times. Children walk to school among abandon buildings and through litter strewn streets while having to avoid crack heads and other dangerous felons.

Then when you get a good picture, read up on a concept called "social proof." The best explanation is in Cialdini's "Influence, science and practice." The gist of it is that much of how we act is based on how those around us act. In the case of our inner city neighborhoods there is so much bad social proof that its almost a guarantee that 99% of children growing up there will become like the savages they grow up around. That is why generation after generation of Detroiters don't speak proper English. Its not because they aren't taught it in school, its because everyone they grow up around speaks Ebonics.

The concept of riding in on a white horse and tapping all the children on the head with a magic wand of education might sound like a great plan but it simply isn't grounded in reality. Before any progress can be made, we must rid the city of all the negative influence. This can be done, but I'm afraid the measures that this would call for would be met with so much opposition that implementing them would be impossible.

In the end, I applaud you for recognizing the value of hard work, education and good choices on a personal level - maybe there is hope for you yet. But I think you are falling short of a true understanding of the problems in our inner cities and how to overcome them. throwing tax dollars into failing schools to try to accomplish the impossible is nothing more than wishful thinking. Chaos breeds chaos - clean up the streets and the businesses move back. Bring the businesses back and it is like watering a dying field. Government's job is to protect us from chaos and get out of the way so that private businesses can water the field.

Let us not forget, New York was once in a state of disarray and was crumbling. Juliani brought the city back not by pouring money into schools but by hiring more cops and cleaning up the streets. That's how it works, you don't just though fertilizer on a garden full of weeds, you get out there and first pull out the bad weeds so the good ones can thrive.
 

CrackerJax

New Member
Job creation is the best weapon for crime and poverty. Heavily unionized states don't create a lot of jobs. They lose them.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Wow Hanimmal, you did a great job of pulling all that info from the internet. Don't you find it a little odd that you would go to all that trouble? Anyway, you might want to actually read what you are posting and think about your own argument a little before just rambling it all off.

If you do, you will notice that 90% of your own argument is highly Conservative. What you inadvertently pointed out is that if an individual wants to work hard and stay out of trouble, even those from the poorest backgrounds can make it in America. And you did a good job I must say.

Where you missed the mark is in two areas. One, you conflated discussion about Government policy with a discussion about individual choices. And again, you inadvertently went from a Liberal argument to a Conservative one. The two are entirely different things.
I dont find it odd at all. I treasure knowledge, and this is a quick type up of some of the things I have been looking at for years.

What you fail to get is that conservative and liberal is just a midset, and has nothing to do with economics. I am a liberal because if a hard decision needs to be made, I will lean towards which is best for the citizens. But usually decisions are easier than that. Economics will show that most decisions have a set response that works the best.

The government policy should always be a response of individual responses because people are the ones that are causing the good or bad (even if it is through businesses).


New York and Detroit have completely different issues. New York revenue was always great, I agree that mismanagment and crime was an issue in NY, just like Detroit, but the monetary issue is a different world.

NY taxes are not restricted by a old outline of the city like it is in Detroit. Their tax lines grew as the cities did, where in Detroit (which you know) are very rigid. It is easy to say that you can just 'clean up' Detroit, but there are not near enough resources to do it. But I do agree that even if there were, people would never go for it.

See I know Detroit inside and out. I have been inside the abandoned buildings, seen the crime first hand, and lived in the city. I get it. But people are people, I will never succumb to the easiness of saying people are animals. Even if you are not able to save them, there are always some that you can. Crime did not stop in NY, they just moved it out of view. And protected the areas that people frequent very well, which they need to do in Detroit.

And I understand the extra costs that you have in the city, not just taxes, but if you get graffiti, higher insurance, if you have to hire money pick-up, ect. That is why there are virtually no grocery stores, the extra costs (and parking) is a nightmare for businesses. And then people that you service get pissed off that you have to sell the items for more money than they do in the suburbs where they have huge parking lots, less security costs, lower taxes, lower security costs, lower insurance, on and on. And then they resent you for it.

Because it is impossible to round up everyone that commits a crime (which would be the fastest/most expensive way and would work), you have to go to the next best thing. Education. If the kids in Detroit did not have that stupid 3 month summer break, it would mean that they would have to be out on the streets less.

Major education reform is needed in detroit. I actually love what Obama's education secretary did in Chicago. He went to schools and fired everyone superintendents down to the janitors. Then took applications and hired the people that wanted to do the job for the children. A lot of teachers just have been so disfranchised that they quit caring, and do a piss poor job, because they look at the kids as animals, and gave up on trying to get through to them. The children only have one shot at an education. As a teacher you can move, and get a new job, but that child is only 5-18 years old once. They only really have one shot to get it right.


I disagree with you saying that businesses will move back if you clean up the streets, because they are already gone. Nobody is going to pick up their business invest millions and not have an educated workforce ready to go. Instead they will go out to Ann Arbor, Troy, Sterling Heights, where it is cheaper and ready to go. The workforce needs to be there first.

And the only way to do that is to get people there educated, because we cannot just rip 20% of the people out and toss them in jail, in order to make it safe for people to move to the city. Which why would people move to a city that has very few good jobs? It is a circle of shit. The only hope is education.


Job creation is the best weapon for crime and poverty. Heavily unionized states don't create a lot of jobs. They lose them.
I agree unions suck. They were very important to the country for a long time, but we are now advanced enough economically that they are no longer needed. They should pack up and go to China or Africa.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
get ready to pay more for tires starting sept 24th!!! Obama loves you!! :lol:
Well at least we won't have to worry about the damned chickens!!! Who minds paying an extra 35% anyway? Oh and most domestic tire manufacturers make their tires over in China, so really its just a tariff on ourselves in a way. Its only going to piss China off.
 

CrackerJax

New Member
Hey, but the good news is.... it cost us 585,000 jobs... :clap:

This is the best administration ever!! Hope! Change!! woot!!
 

ViRedd

New Member
FOX news is the only news co that has reported this story, besides CNN.

No wonder Obama hates FOX, because he hates the truth.

Most the country is left living in ignorant bliss as usual
But talk about stupid ... how stupid are the people that are hired by ACORN? My god, the two kids that exposed the ACORN employees are the most unlikely looking pimp and prostitute on could imagine. Did you guys check out the fur wrap and sunglasses the "pimp" was wearing? :lol:
 
Top