cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
Pudding is soft on dishes. We need a dessert with our nation's grand traditions in mind. I suggest pie. It's flaky, yet conceals a fruity center. I'm a centrist; it's a sweet place to be. cn
Canndo, cheney is a crook also. Cheney has nothing to do with fast and furious. Do you have anything to add to this other than changing the subject to cheney? What about pudding? What about pudding?
I am looking into it now - again Beenthere, where did you get your information about RFID? (I read RfID and not GPS). Where did you get your information that OWR made arrests? I am finding lots of propaganda floating around that seems to be giving bad information. With regard to Cheney - I asked not in order to justify F&F witheld information but to see if there was some consistancy - any lack of consistancy would be such a sign of partisanship.
Did you have a problem with Cheney's refusal to divulge info on a government meeting regarding our nation's energy policy?
Another broken Obama promise of transparency, how sad.
Baaaaah.
Are you fucking serious, you want to argue the semantics of GPS vs. RFID chips?
Aren't they both used as tracking devices, and did they use them for Fast & Furious, NO!
You're falling short Canndo, real short, I don't remember mentioning "arrests", where was that?
And there is no regard to Dick Cheney, again, what the hell does he have to do with Fast & Furious and the Obama administration's fuck ups?
I thought it was about Big Dick CheneyBeenthere, it was you who brought up partisanship not I. Now, is this about Fast and Furious, about Operation Wide Receiver? about Holder's withold? about Obama's complicity? About Obama being a terrible evil person? Or is it about the comparision between how bad one operation was over the other? BTW, you do know that GPS chips can be tracked over distance and RFID cannot.
It's ok for obama since bush did it.
While there may be some partisanship in the behavior of Dems, it pales in comparison to that on the other side.
The Clinton administration invoked executive privilege on fourteen occasions.
Hardly a "pale in comparison"
I'll give Bush and Clinton one thing, at least there wasn't a coverup where our government was responsible for the death of a US law enforcement agent.
Obama handed out those weapons did he? And beyond that, there was a program identical in every way except magnitude in place before Obama took office, Bush's program, Operation Wide Receiver. Now this doesn't exempt Obama but it goes to your original point.
Beenthere, it was you who brought up partisanship not I. Now, is this about Fast and Furious, about Operation Wide Receiver? about Holder's withold? about Obama's complicity? About Obama being a terrible evil person? Or is it about the comparision between how bad one operation was over the other? BTW, you do know that GPS chips can be tracked over distance and RFID cannot.
-President Barack Obama: 1...25th time Executive Privilege invoked.
-President George W. Bush: 6
-President Bill Clinton: 14
-President George H.W. Bush: 1
-President Ronald Reagan: 3
I would bet that at least one of those 14 had something to do with Lewinsky.
I guarantee you that none of them involved the murder of a US law enforcement officer!
It makes a big difference to me, how can there be public outrage unless the people know?
I guarantee you that none of them involved the murder of a US law enforcement officer!
It wasn't public outrage until FoxNews kept displaying it as one and eventually enough right wing extremest picked it up... seriously, first it was a conspiracy to limit the second amendment, now it's a conspiracy against the drug wars... whatever sticks man, whatever sticks.
But here's the deal, no matter who's in the office, things like this will continue to go on and we'll only know about it if either a) info gets leaked or b) something seriously gets fucked up. I guess since we normally don't hear about it, that when we do some people just have to make it a big enough deal.
If you don't like it, Canada is north of us, their government tends to take care of it's citizens more than worrying about opposite parties and foreign wars.
I disagree though about go to Canada if you don't like it, that is a fascistish attitude.
From my understanding, he's saying he doesn't like President's doing shady things; so until either A) he become president and stops it, or B) he finds a politician willing to end his political career to stop it, it'll keep going.
Point is; we've always had a shady government when it comes to foreign affairs (YES F&F was a foreign affair; it involved cartels of a DIFFERENT country). And that will never change. If a person really doesn't like it, and is getting all bent out of shape over it on the internet, then obviously he needs to move to a different country that operates better to his liking... there are over a hundred free countries to choose from; just choose wisely.
Just like in LIFE; in POLITICS there are just somethings that you HAVE to accept and cannot do anything about. Our government being involved in shady/top secret programs is one of the things people just need to accept.