I'm voting for McCain....

bubbleinthebrain

Well-Known Member
Goddamn, this is too frustrating to even begin to go into..

How has it this thread's spanned 172 pages without The Brutal Truth grasping what the truth really is?

Your inability to see the larger picture is disgusting. Poor you with your leased car and 16k a year in taxes! What a truly miserable existence you inhabit..... probably much like families in far off worlds living in makeshift one room houses, in the dirt, struggling each day for water and food. More than half of the world's population lives on less than two dollars a day-- and you grow pot as a HOBBY.

But, if we had it your way, the youth wouldn't even understand this concept, because you'd have it cut out of our basic education.. Because clearly that's where the money's being wasted, teaching about foreign cultures. Shit, I propose injecting more money into education in an attempt to discourage the future adults of the present day children from emitting this same kind of simple minded, cookie cutter bullshit by whatever media will have you.

And explain to me why you've got ZERO compassion to your fellow sapiens? Why wouldn't you pay just a little more in taxes if it meant that some broken family with a husband dying of Parkinson's and a wife working the night shift six days a week, and spending every sunlit moment shuttling her kids off to their responsibilities might get to have a peaceful and joyful thanksgiving with no expenses spared...all because their medical bills might not, for the first time, be controlling their every moment, every action?

And wrong motherfucker, you clearly do not know what socialism is if you think this sorry state of affairs could be considered as such. Last I checked, 10% of Americans own 72% of the country's wealth, more than the bottom 90 percent? Sounds like someone's been capitalizing.

And what would be wrong with socialism?

Yea.... EQUALITY DOES FUCKING SUCK!! GOOD CALL BRUTAL BUTTFUCK!



And I'm madly in love with your supple brain Leilani........<3
 

TheBrutalTruth

Well-Known Member
Goddamn, this is too frustrating to even begin to go into..
I can tell by your spastic disjointed comments.

How has it this thread's spanned 172 pages without The Brutal Truth grasping what the truth really is?
Truth is in the eye of the beholder, and you fail to even come close to presenting a legitimate argument.

Your inability to see the larger picture is disgusting. Poor you with your leased car and 16k a year in taxes! What a truly miserable existence you inhabit..... probably much like families in far off worlds living in makeshift one room houses, in the dirt, struggling each day for water and food. More than half of the world's population lives on less than two dollars a day-- and you grow pot as a HOBBY.
Actually the car isn't leased, it's mortgaged, there's a very large difference.

No, I'm actually very content, as long as I'm not stuck trying to explain to jack asses like you why your philosophy is nothing but the worship of death. Why the religion of environmentalism rivals Hitler and Stalin in the number of deaths it has caused.

As far as half the world's population living on less than two dollars a day. I don't see how that's my fault. I think that if they want to advance, they have the ability to do so themselves. I am not mandating that they advance, or not, I'm not saying that they can't exploit the resources found in their territory. I'm not the one that's running around trying to convince them that the standard of living in the West is despicable, and evil.

If it was up to me they'd be just as prosperous as we are, or even more so.

But I don't know why I'm wasting my time with you. Your inability to think is evident by the fact that you are chanting out the speaking points of your philosophy.

But, if we had it your way, the youth wouldn't even understand this concept, because you'd have it cut out of our basic education.. Because clearly that's where the money's being wasted, teaching about foreign cultures. Shit, I propose injecting more money into education in an attempt to discourage the future adults of the present day children from emitting this same kind of simple minded, cookie cutter bullshit by whatever media will have you.
Simple minded? Wow, I'm amazed that you can use the word with out exploding. You're accusing me of being simple minded yet continue to rant and scream at me like some kind of raging lunatic. Your arguments also show that you have been subject to the brainwashing.

Basic Education, what does that specify. To me, it specifies ensuring that they are capable of reading, speaking, and performing mathematics. Understand a reasonable amount of Physics, Calculus, Finance, and other skills that would be used in their day to day life, to their advantage.

And explain to me why you've got ZERO compassion to your fellow sapiens? Why wouldn't you pay just a little more in taxes if it meant that some broken family with a husband dying of Parkinson's and a wife working the night shift six days a week, and spending every sunlit moment shuttling her kids off to their responsibilities might get to have a peaceful and joyful thanksgiving with no expenses spared...all because their medical bills might not, for the first time, be controlling their every moment, every action?
Who said I have zero compassion?

Compassion doesn't require that I let them steal from me. Compassion does not require that I let them act like barbarians and rob me of my existence. Compassion does not require that I debase myself before them, and tell them to go ahead and ruin me, and destroy my hopes, and my dreams.

When they stop stealing from me, and ask, maybe I'll be willing to help them, but when they force me into indentured servitude at the expense of myself, then I can not give a damn about them. I can not respect them, or care for them.

Your philosophy fails to consistently explain how when everyone is starving and broke that it is going to provide for other people. Your philosophy fails to explain how by destroying everyone it is going to "help" everyone.

And wrong motherfucker, you clearly do not know what socialism is if you think this sorry state of affairs could be considered as such. Last I checked, 10% of Americans own 72% of the country's wealth, more than the bottom 90 percent? Sounds like someone's been capitalizing.
And what does that have to do with anything?

You are arguing against a philosophy and a system based on the fact that 10% of a population controls 72% of the wealth. Yes? and what does that mean to me?

Are you advocating that we steal their money?

That would make you a thief.

Are you advocating that we kill them?

That would make you a murderer.

No, your philosophy, with its talk about eliminating private property, eliminating inheritance, and using force to depopulate cities is the one that is disgusting.

Your philosophy is responsible for something on the order of 70 Million Deaths. The religion of your philosophy, which is what is really preventing those people that you pointed at from exploiting their resources and getting ahead, is responsible for 30 - 50 million more deaths.

Instead of attacking me for being narrow-minded, perhaps you should be actually researching what you are preaching instead of running your mouth.

But that's the difference between Socialists and Libertarians. Socialists preach Marx, Libertarians understand Marx.

And what would be wrong with socialism?
80 Million deaths

Yea.... EQUALITY DOES FUCKING SUCK!! GOOD CALL BRUTAL BUTTFUCK!
Go smoke a joint, you need to chill the fuck out.


And I'm madly in love with your supple brain Leilani........<3
Poor Leilani, a Blockhead is chasing her.
 

TheBrutalTruth

Well-Known Member
Damn it. I have to comment on this one:

Learning about other cultures is all good and well, but it is something that is largely irrelevant to day to day life.

No. You're wrong. Understanding other cultures helps us (1) comprehend the rest of the world; and in this day and age, without a decent understanding of other cultures, our foreign affairs are going to suffer terribly--as we've already seen. More on that later--and (2) helps us understand the many sub-cultures within our larger culture. If we ignore them and refuse to put any effort into learning about their way of life, their values, traditions, etc, we're going to pay the price. Why? Because what are we going to do otherwise? Throw them out? Well, we can't do that. Ignore them? Keep doing that, keep sticking to the stubborn belief that THIS larger culture is THE one, and the social problems will only become worse than they are now.

On a macro level, it's sort of like when you have to explain to someone visiting your home that your great grandfather has Alzheimers and sometimes says outrageous things, so please do not take it personally.

That's way too simplistic an analogy, but? You made me stay up too late and? I'm just tired. Really tard.

NIGHT! EVERYONE! Go to bed NOW, or there will be no fun for you this weekend, because you will be grounded!

More on the education stuff later too. I agree iwth some of what you've said, but naturally, I have to pick apart what you've written and add my own stuff to it.

GO TO BED!:-P
You're going to ground me? Wow... :) I don't think I've heard that in 7 years. Ever since I became an adult.

As far as the argument about cultures not having anything to do with day to day life, I think I'm correct, to a limited but large extent.

I'm not saying that its not necessary to understand different cultures, but I am saying that it should be viewed as more of something that takes place in college, or as electives in high school.

I remember being forced to take Spanish in Middle School. I was bored to tears, and actually didn't retain a damn thing. It just didn't interest me, and thus it was totally wasted on me.

I elected to take Russian in High School and that was also wasted on me, but it was also a required course that I wasn't really interested in.

Though the most interesting part of that class was talking about the culture in Russia (Russian Consumerism since the Fall of the Berlin Wall), and about how in Russia under Socialism there were chronic shortages of different things.

As far as understanding different cultures, and different subcultures, I still have yet to see the need to understand a different culture. Yes, I suspect that if I ever travel outside of this country, it might be necessary, or if I ever visit the Quakers (Amish) it might be necessary to learn about their culture (of course, they are from what I understand Xenophobic, or at least not inclined to appreciate visitors.)

Though that's largely the only subculture I can think of.

For the most part the American Culture can be described in one short phrase, Consumerism, which is rather depressing.
 

Leilani Garden

Well-Known Member
Well, I'm really, really bummed to see two guys whose posts I like beating each other over the heads with caveman clubs. CUT IT OUT!

Bubble is right--this not socialism. But then I think Brutal said this is not socialism either, just consumerism.

Both of you are right, I think.

I will never back down: the best way for us to ensure that most of us get whatever resources we need in order to live our lives is to keep going with capitalism, with elements of socialism tossed in to ease the weak spots on our metaphorical bridge. If we allow capitalism to run its course, we WILL consumer ourselves (Yes, I've read Marx, and I do understand it; in fact, I was had planned on doing a long paper in university on the rhetoric of Das Kapital--it is extremely well written and loaded with logic, which does make it something to contend with. NO! I'm not saying "Let's be communisists." I'm saying it's very well done, very persuasive, with a lot of truth in it.)

Whatever the case, if we do away with all social programs, sure, our taxes might go down (but probably not, what with the gd pork spending going on in DC--they'll find something else to blow it on, like teenage girls at the mall). But even if we spend less, much less, or nothing at all on social programs, we will ALL pay the price.

You've all heard that term Social Darwinism, right? Well, if we do away with all the social programs, we will unleash Social Darwinism. So what would happen then? Unlike plants, dodo birds, dinosaurs, and so on, that simply became extinct, those who would perish under Social Darwinism will NOT go out without letting the "rest" us know how angry they are. And I'll bang my drum some more: if there's enough anger, there will be hellacious violence. Those on the lower rungs our our socioeconomic scales will not allow themselves to become extinct without inflicting horrible suffering on the rest of us. How anyone cannot see this is beyond me.

Regarding Brutal's experience with foreign languages in high school? Oh, you may think it did you no good to study another language, but the facts are not in yoru corner. Learning/studying any other language forces you, just FORCES you, to learn your own language better. That's a fact, not an opinion. So while you may not be able to chatter with the local Mexicans, you do know your own language better due to your study of Spanish, Ditto for the time and effort you spent studying Russian. Do you not recall being puzzled by the prepositions, the positions of subjects and predicates while studying those languages?

And once you know your own language better, the better able you are to reason, to use logic and rhetoric (rhetoric in the Aristotelian sense, not the way we toss that word around today). If you know your own language very, very well, you're able to think and reason more clearly. So no, your time was not wasted studying those languages. It exercised your brain, made it grow (yes, that is scientific fact), and left you with more than you realize.

Brutal, you also wrote that you don't see any subcultures in this country, except for one (I don't recall at the moment which one you named). No, wrong! Where are black Americans in your discussion of subcultures? That's a huge subculture. We DO need to understand black culture way, way better than we do. How come? Out of the goodness of our hearts? (Well, for me, that's true, but I won't shove that down anyone else's throats, except for my children). No, we need to understand their unique culture, their values, their way of life, their family structures, and so on, so that we can better understand our fellow citizens; and since blacks are still taking so much of the blame for all that is wrong with our country, it's a really great idea to try to learn their culture.

Google "GULLAH language culture low country south carolina georgia" and see if you can find info about how terribly these descendants of slaves were treated by the so-called upstanding members of society. IT's a fascinating story. These people HAVE been robbed, and to a much, much larger degree than you are and have been, paying your $16K in taxes. They were robbed of integrity, their children treated like idiots, placed in the "stupid" classes at school .. . when, had anyone been astute enough to see it (there were some who did, but were swiftly punished for trying to communicate their knowledge), it would have been glaringly obvious: this is an authentic sub culture, with its own language, right here on American soil.

Ignore them, and any of the other subcultures here on American soil, and yeah, we'll all pay the cost.

Re environmentalism being like a religion. I've heard that before. Tell me why. I give a damn about this topic because I DO NOT WANT TO EAT POISON FISH, I do not want my children poisoned, I do not like the idea of swimming in waters contaminated with hog waste that spurs the growth of dino flaggelates that can attack my immune system, etc, etc, etc. Yeah, I'm pissed about the corporate hog shit winding up in MY rivers, streams and seas. Is that religion? I guess you could force it into that box, but I see it more as being plain pragmatic. I don't like hog shit. Do you?

Tips? Tigs? So very glad you like my new signature, lol. I like your avatars, but I do hope that those pics are not really you . . . this site being what it is, you know? Go to bed, Tipsgnob (did I get it finally?). I'll make you a deal: you go to bed and I'll shut up. :o

And Bubble Brain? I'm so glad you like my supple brain. God knows it's saturated with a lot of shit from plastics and hog shit, but it's MY brain, damn it, and I'm glad you appreciate it! I like your bubbles! So bubbly, effervescent!

More on the education stuff later, Brutal. I'm going to bed.

Night everyone.

Just noticed Bubble is from the Big Apple. You rock, man. And how I wish I was there this weekend, walking around in the city, watching all the shenanigans. NYC is the best. Or wait. Are you one of those who live in the Fish Kill regions? Catskill? All that? WTF is up with those names for towns? Lake George? That is one beautiful place. Same for all the stuff out on the end of Long Island . . . although the super rich have ruined it and made it like LA, just in a beautiful locale. Oh, how I love NY.
 

Leilani Garden

Well-Known Member
Sorry, everyone, but I had to comment on this:

Brutal wrote:

about how in Russia under Socialism there were chronic shortages of different things

Wrong! The USSR was NOT socialist. They were hard core communists. There IS a difference between socialism and communism. Communism, like fascism (which is here in the US now) includes totalitarianism. And therein lies most of the problems. We cannot have the government dictating to us how we live, wh at we can say, what our careers will be, how many children we can or should have, how much a woman's right to choose is controlled by the government, and so on.

At EITHER extreme, capitalism or fascism, you've got totalitarianism. And it will always implode. That's what happened in the USSR. They tried to control every citizen, and it backfired. That will happen in any fascist government system as well. Google naziism fascism totalitarianism to see just how similar these two ends of the political spectrum are, have been, and always will be.

The USSR sure as hell was running out of everything. In the end, their currency was worthless (since currency is only worth what any given group of people believe it is worth) and at one point, the government tried paying their slave laborer citizens with appliances. Yeah, really, not kidding. I don't know about anyone else, but I've got a washer and dryer. I don't want that for a pay check.

I do think, however, that at least 99% of those participating on this board are on the same page when it comes to true communism.

The problem is showing those of you who are lumping socialism in with communism that you've got it wrong. Socialism is NOT communism.

But I'm going to bed. I love my bed and I don't spend enough time with it anymore. It calls to me and I have to call back, "I'll be there shortly! Stop nagging!"

It's nagging and I"ve got to go get to know its culture before it becomes extinct :arrow: to my bed.

Bon soir, all.
 

TheBrutalTruth

Well-Known Member
Well, I'm really, really bummed to see two guys whose posts I like beating each other over the heads with caveman clubs. CUT IT OUT!

Bubble is right--this not socialism. But then I think Brutal said this is not socialism either, just consumerism.

Both of you are right, I think.

I will never back down: the best way for us to ensure that most of us get whatever resources we need in order to live our lives is to keep going with capitalism, with elements of socialism tossed in to ease the weak spots on our metaphorical bridge. If we allow capitalism to run its course, we WILL consumer ourselves (Yes, I've read Marx, and I do understand it; in fact, I was had planned on doing a long paper in university on the rhetoric of Das Kapital--it is extremely well written and loaded with logic, which does make it something to contend with. NO! I'm not saying "Let's be communisists." I'm saying it's very well done, very persuasive, with a lot of truth in it.)

Whatever the case, if we do away with all social programs, sure, our taxes might go down (but probably not, what with the gd pork spending going on in DC--they'll find something else to blow it on, like teenage girls at the mall). But even if we spend less, much less, or nothing at all on social programs, we will ALL pay the price.

You've all heard that term Social Darwinism, right? Well, if we do away with all the social programs, we will unleash Social Darwinism. So what would happen then? Unlike plants, dodo birds, dinosaurs, and so on, that simply became extinct, those who would perish under Social Darwinism will NOT go out without letting the "rest" us know how angry they are. And I'll bang my drum some more: if there's enough anger, there will be hellacious violence. Those on the lower rungs our our socioeconomic scales will not allow themselves to become extinct without inflicting horrible suffering on the rest of us. How anyone cannot see this is beyond me.

Regarding Brutal's experience with foreign languages in high school? Oh, you may think it did you no good to study another language, but the facts are not in yoru corner. Learning/studying any other language forces you, just FORCES you, to learn your own language better. That's a fact, not an opinion. So while you may not be able to chatter with the local Mexicans, you do know your own language better due to your study of Spanish, Ditto for the time and effort you spent studying Russian. Do you not recall being puzzled by the prepositions, the positions of subjects and predicates while studying those languages?

And once you know your own language better, the better able you are to reason, to use logic and rhetoric (rhetoric in the Aristotelian sense, not the way we toss that word around today). If you know your own language very, very well, you're able to think and reason more clearly. So no, your time was not wasted studying those languages. It exercised your brain, made it grow (yes, that is scientific fact), and left you with more than you realize.

Brutal, you also wrote that you don't see any subcultures in this country, except for one (I don't recall at the moment which one you named). No, wrong! Where are black Americans in your discussion of subcultures? That's a huge subculture. We DO need to understand black culture way, way better than we do. How come? Out of the goodness of our hearts? (Well, for me, that's true, but I won't shove that down anyone else's throats, except for my children). No, we need to understand their unique culture, their values, their way of life, their family structures, and so on, so that we can better understand our fellow citizens; and since blacks are still taking so much of the blame for all that is wrong with our country, it's a really great idea to try to learn their culture.

Google "GULLAH language culture low country south carolina georgia" and see if you can find info about how terribly these descendants of slaves were treated by the so-called upstanding members of society. IT's a fascinating story. These people HAVE been robbed, and to a much, much larger degree than you are and have been, paying your $16K in taxes. They were robbed of integrity, their children treated like idiots, placed in the "stupid" classes at school .. . when, had anyone been astute enough to see it (there were some who did, but were swiftly punished for trying to communicate their knowledge), it would have been glaringly obvious: this is an authentic sub culture, with its own language, right here on American soil.

Ignore them, and any of the other subcultures here on American soil, and yeah, we'll all pay the cost.

Re environmentalism being like a religion. I've heard that before. Tell me why. I give a damn about this topic because I DO NOT WANT TO EAT POISON FISH, I do not want my children poisoned, I do not like the idea of swimming in waters contaminated with hog waste that spurs the growth of dino flaggelates that can attack my immune system, etc, etc, etc. Yeah, I'm pissed about the corporate hog shit winding up in MY rivers, streams and seas. Is that religion? I guess you could force it into that box, but I see it more as being plain pragmatic. I don't like hog shit. Do you?

Tips? Tigs? So very glad you like my new signature, lol. I like your avatars, but I do hope that those pics are not really you . . . this site being what it is, you know? Go to bed, Tipsgnob (did I get it finally?). I'll make you a deal: you go to bed and I'll shut up. :o

And Bubble Brain? I'm so glad you like my supple brain. God knows it's saturated with a lot of shit from plastics and hog shit, but it's MY brain, damn it, and I'm glad you appreciate it! I like your bubbles! So bubbly, effervescent!

More on the education stuff later, Brutal. I'm going to bed.

Night everyone.

Just noticed Bubble is from the Big Apple. You rock, man. And how I wish I was there this weekend, walking around in the city, watching all the shenanigans. NYC is the best. Or wait. Are you one of those who live in the Fish Kill regions? Catskill? All that? WTF is up with those names for towns? Lake George? That is one beautiful place. Same for all the stuff out on the end of Long Island . . . although the super rich have ruined it and made it like LA, just in a beautiful locale. Oh, how I love NY.
Learn something new every day...

Such as about the Gullah Geechee. Interesting stuff, and rather disturbing, because it illustrates a lack of respect for the property rights of others.

Even I acknowledge the need to have hard limits to what companies, individuals and corporations are allowed to do.

As far as the history of the south. Yes, it's absolutely disgusting what some people will do to others.

Grr... I don't know how to say what I want to say, or rather how to connect what I want to say to this, because it will sound like I'm trying to argue for and against it.

Here it goes. Yes, what was done to the Gullah Geechee was digusting and wrong, and perhaps you are right about the need to understand sub-cultures.

As far as languages. No, I suspect that my usage and understanding of English didn't improve because of my study of foreign languages. I still do a horrible job of constructing run on sentences, and sentence fragments and despite knowing this I can not excersize the discipline that would be necessary to correct the problem.

Though I think you are probably right about the need to understand sub-cultures. I'm not going to bother trying to argue that I'm not wrong about that. I've learned that sometimes its easier to stop ramming your head against a brick wall.

As far as Socialism/Communism/Environmentalism.

Yes, they serve some good, but even then there are balances that must be reached that ensure that everyone can enjoy our natural resources. For me that means being able to go rock collecting, and not having to worry about Mercury contamination of our land and water, and of my personal dwelling.

There are limits to what is good, and what is just outright idiotic. Amongst those are the banning of DDT (which was shown not to be an eggshell thinner, toxic, nor cancerous) and the banning of which has caused an estimated 30 - 50 Million Deaths.

Another is the usage of CFLs which contain Mercury. It is all good and well to desire efficiency, and lower electricity consumption, but when it is taken to extremes that ultimately do more harm than good, and cause more problems or greater problems then the ones they solve then the line is being crossed.

Blind adherence to any thing with out examining the complete consequence can only be called religion. Or acting on the faith of one's "righteousness".

I also mentioned the my desire to go rock collecting. It seems asinine to me that I am banned from visiting a state park and collecting minerals and gemstones for my own sake, and amusement.

Stupidity is stupidity, regardless of what form it takes, and what "goals" it pretends to have or desire.

As far as Socialism. Once again it is something that is running into a brick wall of its own creation where it fails to do what it is supposedly setting out to do, and then attempts to convince people that it needs yet more funding to fail even more spectacularly.

There is a vast difference between asking people to voluntarily help others, and forcing them to do so against their will, and then having the audacity to ask them to do yet more.

Too often people state that I should feel obligated to pay taxes, but they fail to account for the fact that based on the goals and premises of the social programs they push those programs are complete and total failures. Welfare? Medicaid? Medicare? Social Security? CRA? All of these programs have failed to do what they were positioned as doing.

Welfare. Welfare is a sick pathetic joke perpetuated upon the left by government. The only people benefiting from the billions dumped into welfare are the bureaucrats it provides employment for. I read somewhere that for every 80K dumped into Welfare only 16K filters down.

Medicaid/Medicare. The goal behind these programs was to help provide healthcare for the poor and those that need it. Instead due to the fact that the government failed to adequately address rising demand needing rising supply we have a chronic shortage of Health Care Professionals. We also have healthcare professionals who are so sick of trying to deal with a government bureaucracy that they no longer voluntarily see Medicaid/Medicare Patients. Yet there are continuously attempts to expand coverage to more people with out increasing supply. It's economics 101 in that to maintain steady prices supply must rise with demand.

The people that support these programs are now blaming people who don't have health insurance for increasing healthcare expenses, when the underlying flaw is the system itself. Actually, arguably the underlying flaw could be viewed as the same failure to adopt to economic realities in education.

Because of the government's interference in the markets the Middle Class is being priced out of Medical Care.

Education - Same deal. Free Lunches create artificial scarcity for those that do not benefit from those free lunches. Which leads to the Middle Class being priced out of higher education.

Social Security - Ah, my favorite collosal lie. This one is easy to point at as being retarded, and fraudulent. This program is nothing more than the government's favorite piggy bank. What's more ironic is despite all this talk of a "lock box" the damn thing is still being raided by the government and being given IOUs. I'm still confused as to how it is possible for the government to owe itself money, but maybe I ought to try that on my taxes, and state that I owe myself 300,000 for an imaginary loan I gave myself on my parent's house and write off the interest payments on this imaginary loan. After all, I would just be following the government's example.

No, I think the best alternative to this program is to privatize it, and get it away from the government, which has illustrated that it can not be trusted.

This is the only logical conclusion that can be drawn from the fact that all too often the very people this was supposed to provide for are stuck working after retirement, and that the people that are supposedly going to be helped in the future are being told that it's going to go bankrupt.

Community Re-Investment Act - In a desire to provide "Affordable" housing the government mandated that banks provide sub prime loans in the 1970s. Then in 1994 this legislation was strengthened. This lead to the housing crisis which is at the root of the current economic malaise.

Now, we have idiotic politicians talking about the need to stabilize housing prices. Once again due to the stupidity of government we see another segment where the middle class is getting shafted, and priced out of the market.

Socialism is all good and well, but there are limits to what should be done. There is a method to the operation of the markets, and there is a reason why Capitalism is viewed as the most equitable system.

It provides for those that will work for what they want, and provides motivation for people to work towards advancing themselves through the acquirement of additional skills and knowledge so that they can get better jobs to purchase nicer things.

"Inequality of Property will exist as long as Liberty Exists."

Though perhaps a more fervent argument against Socialism is that under its auspices the Left, which continuously states that EVERYONE must contribute to society, some people (mostly government employees, and government contractors) are not contributing to society but are robbing it blind. I'm not going to say that this can't happen amongst the private sector, but the amounts of money that could be scammed would be much smaller, because there would be much more oversight by the interested parties.

The failure of government is the failure of Socialism, because it is under Socialism that the government has become bloated, inefficient and wasteful.

Socialists pressed for the Income Tax, which can be seen as something that directly enabled government to reach the behemoth size it has reached.

33% Taxes? Do you people truly hate your fellow man so much that you must punish him by forcing him into slavery?

But that's not the worst part. The worst part is when the effective tax rates hit 50%. This easily occurs when people are making as little as 100K a year. Federal Income Tax, Federal OASDI, Medicaid/Medicare, Employer OASDI, State Income Tax, Municipal Income Tax, County Income Tax, Property Tax (State, Local, Municipal, School District), Self-Employment Tax, Death Tax, so and so forth, and on and on and on and on... and on.

And you act surprised when people like me express my hatred of you, and refuse to even consider your ideology.

It's because your ideology doesn't work the way you are implementing it.

It is because your ideology is sick, and immoral.

It is because your ideology yammers on and on and on about empowering the impoverished, but fails to accomplish it in such a way that it does not leave everyone impoverished.

$16K in taxes, 1/3rd of my income, 1/3rd of my working life wasted paying for your failed social experiments, and yet (I'm sorry Leilani) some people think I should feel grateful that I'm not being stripped of more.

You talk about empowerment, and then fail to actually realize that you are like a dog that is chasing its tail, and never being able to catch it.

Mandatory Taxation, Mandatory "Contributions" to Society do not accomplish anything but creating hatred, contempt, disgust and anger. Of course, you the turn around and say that I have no right to be angry, or disgusted. I should be grateful that I can help my fellow man.

Fellow man, hah, perhaps I should save you the effort of pretending to be blind to the flaws in your system of mandatory contribution, and just start saying, yes master, may I bend over further for you master, may I kiss your ass masters. Would you like me to give you all rim jobs?

You talk about empowerment and then strip people of their rights. The only people benefitting from your "empowerment" are bureaucrats, and what's so damn fucking sad, is that you people don't see it.

No, you insist on more and more taxes, more and more spending, more and more social programs.

It's absurd. Your system has been hijacked by the very elite that you hate, and you are blind to it. You act like maybe if we force people to sacrifice more, we will some how achieve a perfect society. Your "perfect" society is unattainable. Do none of you actually understand psychology, and live in reality?

Do none of you actually study history?

USSR - Failed

North Korea - Poor and backwards.

China - Socialist Capitalism (The Factory Floor of the World) - Failure for Socialism, if Socialism worked China wouldn't have resorted to Capitalism.

Vietnam - Socialist Capitalism (Another failure of Socialism)

The list goes on, and on, and on.

Your Ideology doesn't work, and will never work, because people will never be "perfect".

And you can not make people perfect... actually I supposed you can, but I shudder to think about the boringness and sameness of a society that consists of a bunch of people that were brainwashed into an existence where they deny their very individuality.

No, Society is comprised of Individuals, thus in order to ensure the proper functioning of Society you must Empower All Individuals. Not just some individuals, not just select groups of individuals, ALL INDIVIDUALS.

Which means Socialism or (I think the latest term for it ) a Resource Based Society.

Great, shoot all the knowledge workers now! We don't produce resources, we produce services. Thus under your resource based economy we are going to starve to death.

All you socialists, I got a wonderful Russian phrase for you, Yob tvoyu maht.
 

Parker

Well-Known Member
At EITHER extreme, capitalism or fascism, you've got totalitarianism. And it will always implode. That's what happened in the USSR. They tried to control every citizen, and it backfired. That will happen in any fascist government system as well. Google naziism fascism totalitarianism to see just how similar these two ends of the political spectrum are, have been, and always will be.
I've never heard that before. Can you site examples of capitalism failing. When you say capitalism are you refering to or lumping in a free market system with capitalism?
 

Parker

Well-Known Member
There is a vast difference between asking people to voluntarily help others, and forcing them to do so against their will, and then having the audacity to ask them to do yet more.

Because of the government's interference in the markets the Middle Class is being priced out of Medical Care.
I agree with you 100 percent. Nothing like the facts to get to a reasonable conclusion.
Although well intentioned, the socialists programs this country has pushed upon its citizens have failed miserably. It amazes me the amount of people who don't get it.
Our government continually pushes their horseshit programs on its citizens, draining them of money and giving inadequate results. The cry rises up over health care. Someone will mention they know another who has a horrible disease and would not live with another system in place. That may or may not be true. What is true is there are winners and losers in every system. (except for the clowns who give out ribbons to everyone who participates) The current health care is a joke. So which is the best system? It's obvious from the results the one size systems now in place do not work. When you subsidize something you get more of it.

With the internet people now have the ability to research and find out what does and doesn't work from many different sources. Instead of looking and finding logical solutions too many people continue to throw good money after bad. It's like a bad dream. I hope Americans wake up before it's too late.
 

Bongulator

Well-Known Member
I wish people would understand that we already have universal health care. If you do not have health care, and do not have money, and get sick, then go to a hospital and they will treat you. That's the law. Oh, maybe you don't get the best care in the world if you're broke, but you will be treated, and if not, then those who refused to treat you have committed a crime.

So, the question isn't "do we want universal health care". We already have it, and it's not going away. The question is, is this the BEST way of paying for universal health care. And it absolutely is not. This is the most expensive possible way to pay for it, because this method involves waiting until things get really bad and thus cost more. Preventive treatment would save TONS of money. The money that we AREN'T saving, by maintaining this idiotic method of providing medical care (via emergency room visits), is all being passed onto everyone else who has health insurance.

That's right, if you have health insurance, and you wonder why it costs so much, part of the reason is that you are subsidizing the most inefficient possible way of treating the unwashed masses. Turning people away and letting them die is not an option -- that'd only last until the first child died from something easily treatable and photos and video of that dead child flood the media. So, the choice is to either modernize universal health care, by bringing everyone on board (which would reduce costs), or keep letting those who pay for healthcare now continue subsidizing emergency room treatment for the rest -- which is enormously expensive.
 

Parker

Well-Known Member
So, the choice is to either modernize universal health care, by bringing everyone on board (which would reduce costs), or keep letting those who pay for healthcare now continue subsidizing emergency room treatment for the rest -- which is enormously expensive.
lol you would have to be insane to believe those are the two choices. One of the reasons health care is so expensive is because there is no competition. Doesn't matter much if you have 1 billion people or 10 billion people on board.

Common sense and facts show a free market normally follows the rules of the more the merrier, the lower the cost. When it's not a free market you are normally stuck with the high prices dictated by that single entity.

Since when do the fuckers in government give a shit about Americans?
 

Leilani Garden

Well-Known Member
I've never heard that before. Can you site examples of capitalism failing. When you say capitalism are you refering to or lumping in a free market system with capitalism?
Sorry, that's a typo. I meant COMMUNISM and fascism, not capitalism.

That was a :dunce: of a typo!
 

Leilani Garden

Well-Known Member
lol you would have to be insane to believe those are the two choices. One of the reasons health care is so expensive is because there is no competition. Doesn't matter much if you have 1 billion people or 10 billion people on board.

Common sense and facts show a free market normally follows the rules of the more the merrier, the lower the cost. When it's not a free market you are normally stuck with the high prices dictated by that single entity.

Since when do the fuckers in government give a shit about Americans?
Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.

A free market is great for money-making enterprises, yes. But when it comes to health care, the profit part should be pretty low on the totem pole for the CITIZENS.

How about you watch a loved one die of a horrible illness, robbed of his or her pension before they can be properly treated. Think this is not a reality? Is sure as hell is.

Canada's rate of newborn deaths is much lower than ours. That's okay with you, in your free market--make it profitable, first and foremost, ideals? Dead babies?

Lost pensions. Senior citizens who are veterans of WW2, etc, being bled to death paying thousands per month for their spouses to be in low class nursing homes? Losing all that money that they saved for their retirement? That's cool with you? It's not with me.

Bongulator, as usual, I agree with you. I do want to say, however, that it's not very likely for someone with, say, cervical cancer in its nascent stages to show up in an ER. That's not something that will be treated in an ER. And unless that woman has insurance, she's going to find it very, very difficult to get it treated as well as those with great insurance.

Same with prostate cancer, breast cancer, etc. People who find themselves with diseases like that are not in the ER. THey're at home, worrying themselves to death, almost literally.

Our health care system sucks. We spend more per capita than other other western industrialized society, yet we treat fewer people per capita. It's one seriously screwed up system.

Tigs? I thought we all did go to bed. :twisted:
 

TheBrutalTruth

Well-Known Member
I wish people would understand that we already have universal health care. If you do not have health care, and do not have money, and get sick, then go to a hospital and they will treat you. That's the law. Oh, maybe you don't get the best care in the world if you're broke, but you will be treated, and if not, then those who refused to treat you have committed a crime.

So, the question isn't "do we want universal health care". We already have it, and it's not going away. The question is, is this the BEST way of paying for universal health care. And it absolutely is not. This is the most expensive possible way to pay for it, because this method involves waiting until things get really bad and thus cost more. Preventive treatment would save TONS of money. The money that we AREN'T saving, by maintaining this idiotic method of providing medical care (via emergency room visits), is all being passed onto everyone else who has health insurance.

That's right, if you have health insurance, and you wonder why it costs so much, part of the reason is that you are subsidizing the most inefficient possible way of treating the unwashed masses. Turning people away and letting them die is not an option -- that'd only last until the first child died from something easily treatable and photos and video of that dead child flood the media. So, the choice is to either modernize universal health care, by bringing everyone on board (which would reduce costs), or keep letting those who pay for healthcare now continue subsidizing emergency room treatment for the rest -- which is enormously expensive.
That doesn't address the issue of cost. What if I don't want to pay for HEALTH INSURANCE which is not HEALTH CARE?

Because the government is interfering in the markets the Middle class is getting shafted.

The poor get hand outs, the rich get richer, and the middle class gets bent over and raped.
 

Leilani Garden

Well-Known Member
Idea for you, Brutal Truth. Go check out your state's rules for getting on medicaid. Seriously, go check it out.

Yes, the middle class is getting shafted badly. And pensions earned and saved are going up in smoke, all in the name of profit? That's one disgusting situation.
 
Top