OGEvilgenius
Well-Known Member
None of them "need" a bail out. None of them did. They all should have failed. The depositors should have received their returns first, capital should have shifted appropriately from the hands of those who took risks to those who played it safe (savers and such) through the pricing mechanisms of the market.
This idea that they HAD to be bailed out says everything you need to know for example about Elizabeth Warrren. Clearly 100% in the pocket of big banks even making such a stupid and ridiculous statement.