hybridway2
Amare Shill
That is one thing I gotta give her props on and something you definitely don't see many other "box" led fixture sellers doing -
https://www.hydrogrowparts.com[/QUOTE
Yup! Specifically designed to upgrade.
You wouldn't base ur pic of light to own?, based on the outcome of the grow?That's 15 watts per light fixture....correct? So, 60 watts going to cooling for 4 HGL fixtures compared to 0 watts going to cooling for the HLG Trinity?
@hybridway2 Yes, I agree....I don't think this contest is going to produce vastly different plant-growth results between the two fixtures....because the plants only care about photons they can use. And it doesn't matter what kind of light produces those photons. It can be anything from the highest technology lights to a bunch of incandescent bulbs in an aluminum foil lined closet -as long as there are enough photons and rest of the growing conditions are accounted for, of course.
I think the results are going to be close! I wouldn't base my pick on the results of the plant growth. I'd make my choice between these two lights based on almost every other factor -like the durability, electrical safety, ease-of use, simplicity, weight and lack of moving parts.
N.O. but i think ur missing the point HGL is trying to prove.
We all know she's going to upgrade her fixtures & change the design in the near future. She made that clear admitting her tech or way of light dispersion is now played out.
The reason she's so cocky throwing a decade old design using Epis up against whatever she could find to be the baddest Ass, voted n all. Is because of the spectrum & science used to make it that has been ignored since bad burples blatantly beat us up.
Example: i remember being haggled on my Amare thread a few yrs ago by a guy whom asked me for links supporting evidence that "Amares'" enhanced white (they are not all the same & its noticeable when growing) spectrum is better then the plain white. After a few chuckles cuz i don't do links n computer stuff much, my response was: yeah, just look at any of the 1000's of Chlorophyll Peak Charts that have been available forever. He did not respond.
Its messed up because of the fact that shitty Burple lights using crappy components sold by shady fly by nighters caused such shit results people just totally disregarded all the previous scientific Data supporting specific Nanometers.
Now, with the slightest of common sense, seeing results ur satisfied with that r prob better then ur hps (sad part is many never even used the hps but think they can compare their leds) using inexpensive white DIY rigs. Why wouldn't that person think if white does so good & Burple used to & has data supporting it, then Obviously the White that is targeting Chloro Peaks in its SPD is better?
Yeah, its that Capt. Obvious shit they didn't get, ya know. Just Mooooing along, following the herd. This test here tho, scientific Cammi Data or not is not the same as comparing white to enhanced white. She prob sees it that way like i did then & i'm/we're the cows mooooing along. But if that was the case then you're really gonna tell me 12 yrs have gone by that youve been making loud claims & selling the Penetrators but one of the most knowledgeable forums available has no clue & nobody else has tried ur 10/15/75 ratio thats been made public a decade ago??? I just dont see how something so special slipped through the cracks like that?
Sure, u were banned & erased. But no one else saw the same study n decided to build led grow lights?
Why does Advanced, Plat, Mars, CLW, BlckDg, all use allot more then 10% blue?
And why is it that when Hortrilux ran 10% blue it was so desired to have more so they added more?
Terpins n Trichlomes
Now here we have HGL saying if its white phosphor at all as the base then its gonna be sub-par to her older models even.
Soooo, now we find out the truth.
I do hope everyone can agree now tho that properly enhanced white is better horticultural lighting then Wharehouse lighting.
Last edited:
