desert dude
Well-Known Member
Journolist tactic, straight up!
Shouldn't you be over at stormfront creating an account in my name, like you did for red1966?
have many noticed...
- Thread starter blindbaby
- Start date
Shouldn't you be over at stormfront creating an account in my name, like you did for red1966?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
show me where i created any accounts, fuckface.
you are a racist. that's not a tactic, that's a statement of fact.
you still can't answer simple questions about matters of fact. you run away like the pussy little bitch that you are.
desert dude
Well-Known Member
You might as well get the facts right. O'Keefe was an independent, not employed directly by anybody. He had a juicy story that exposed ACORN for the left-wing boobs they actually were. No left wing media outlet (i.e. everybody but FOX) would touch that expose, so FOX ran it. It was hilarious. ACORN was dissolved as a result of the story. Now, here you are defending them. SURPRISE!!!
zambonic
Well-Known Member
zambonic
Well-Known Member
StevenSD420
Active Member
he may say and act like one, but his actions don't really say liberal
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0810/Fox_parent_gives_1_million_to_RGA.html
That's a lot of shit right there, you mad bro?
Ahh, his liberal actions are true to form my friend, anytime most lefties get in the position to reap the rewards of capitalism, their ideals soon take a second fiddle!
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
so, you're not going to address the enormous amount of lies that fox hailed o'keefe for and never corrected?
desert dude
Well-Known Member
I watched O'Keefe's ACORN videos. I watched ACORN implode as a result. I laughed. O'Keefe was trying to make a name for himself. That is about the extent of what I know about O'Keefe.
No comment from you regarding journolist? You use the word "enormous" when talking about O'Keefe, a lone independent journalist. Journolist was composed of about 400 journalists, all of them liberal, all of them employed with mainstream media outlets, none of them FOX journalists, none of them conservatives. Journolist excluded conservatives from its membership. Given the facts, "Enormous" seems out of place in this discussion. Maybe it is just me, an unbiased consumer of news?
Maybe Canndo will jump in here to talk about journolist?
desert dude
Well-Known Member
You never miss an opportunity to race-bait a "white American male", do you, Bucky?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
ok, so you admit that you have no idea about the propaganda that your "fair and balanced" channel ran with. dumbass strike 1.
you then compare journolist, which did nothing even remotely comparable, to said network. dumbass strike 2.
then you call yourself an unbiased consumer of news. dumbass strike three.
you are one of the most biased dumbasses on this site. i mean, only a truly courageous judge would take a controversial murder case and refuse to even let it see the light of day, right?
you racist piece of shit.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
refer to the OP.
being a white conservative american male is nothing like being a jew in the holocaust, you racist piece of shit.
Bucky, let's hear what you personally know about racism.
You use this term more than anyone on the site, surely you have some experiences to share, one or two brief accounts will do.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
this one time, i met a guy online who would deride people he disagreed with as "niggas".
this other time, i met a guy online who would run away and refuse to explain how someone ends up 50+ feet away from where they say they were knocked down and pinned in a matter of 45 seconds.
beardo
Well-Known Member
[youtube]ByPwoGTVFbY[/youtube]
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
So is this your way of being saved the embarrassment of admitting the only thing you know about racism is what you read on the internet?
You know, I've been searching this forum to find one single thread where you have actually participated in a debate, not a damn one can I find. Seems like every time you get pinned down on an issue, you become sarcastic or post cartoons, you come up with more excesses not to engage than anyone I know.
Is it because I made you look like a fool on your 25% tax claim or that I question the existence of your make believe wealthy father in-law?