FBI arrest 6 men in a militia plot to kidnap Michigan governor who also wanted to kill police officers.

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
It will be interesting to see what the jury has to say about this when they get booked on Tucker.

https://www.rawstory.com/jury-acquits-two-men-in-michigan-governor-kidnapping-case-deadlocks-on-charge-for-two-others/Screen Shot 2022-04-08 at 3.19.47 PM.png
(Reuters) - A federal jury on Friday acquitted two men of conspiring to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer in 2020 and was deadlocked on the same charges for two other men.

The men were charged in a plot prosecutors say had been inspired by their fierce opposition to pandemic-related restrictions that her office imposed.

In a federal court in Grand Rapids, Michigan, the 12-member panel found Adam Fox and Daniel Harris not guilty of kidnapping conspiracy charges. The jury was not able to agree on a verdict for Brandon Caserta and Barry Croft Jr.

Harris was also found not guilty of knowingly conspiring to use a weapon of mass destruction against persons or property for allegations of plotting to use explosives to blow up a bridge after abducting the governor. The jury was not able to reach a verdict against Fox and Croft for the same charge, resulting in a mistrial. Caserta did not face the weapons charge.

The prosecution, who said the men belonged to self-styled militia groups, accused them of planning to break into Whitmer's vacation home, spirit her away and put her on "trial" for treason.

The kidnapping, the defendants had hoped, would force an end to Whitmer's pandemic mandates, while pushing the country - highly polarized ahead of the 2020 elections - into a second American civil war, the prosecution said.

The case stands one of the most high-profile prosecutions of alleged members of right-wing organizations that have sprung up in the years since former President Donald Trump's election in 2016. It also highlights the extent to which the pandemic and government efforts to control it have become a wedge issue in U.S. politics.

The defense argued that the government used FBI informants and undercover agents to encourage the online discussions, hoping to entrap the defendants in alleged crimes because of their political views, they said.

The acquittals come despite key testimony from Ty Garbin and Kaleb Franks, two others who were charged in the alleged plot before striking plea deals with prosecutors. Garbin is currently serving a six-year sentence, while Franks is awaiting sentencing.

The four on trial are among 13 men who were arrested in October 2020 and charged with state or federal crimes in the alleged kidnapping conspiracy. Seven of them are facing charges in state court.

The FBI said it had begun tracking the group's movements after seeing online discussions that included posts about the violent overthrow of some state governments.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Didn't go the way you commie pukes wanted huh? Maybe the FIBs should be looking into the Briben crime family instead. They have the laptop with all the crime info on it. No need to make shit up like you commies always do. Enjoy the L you fucktards.
Commie pukes? lmao

Almost as funny as your regurgitation of 'but her emails' line.

But I'm 75/25 on this. I think it is far better that they stopped these idiots before we had to witness them executing our governor or kill some cops in a bitch ass getaway attempt, even if it meant that meant it would be harder to prosecute them.

It is not like these stupid INCEL fucks are going to have a good life or anything going forward.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Didn't go the way you commie pukes wanted huh? Maybe the FIBs should be looking into the Briben crime family instead. They have the laptop with all the crime info on it. No need to make shit up like you commies always do. Enjoy the L you fucktards.
I wasn't surprised. Vlad and Trump are more like each other than not. The commie pukes are all Republican nowadays. Those militia boys would fit right in with Vlad's SS in Ukraine.

I don't know why anybody would want that in the US. Except maybe Incel nihilists.
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
Didn't go the way you commie pukes wanted huh? Maybe the FIBs should be looking into the Briben crime family instead. They have the laptop with all the crime info on it. No need to make shit up like you commies always do. Enjoy the L you fucktards.
but i thought the republicunts were the ones who loved putin? doesn't trump have his nose up putin's ass still? didn't he just beg papa putin to come save him with some nonexistent dirt on his enemies? putin may have a hard time helping anyone for a while, so what will poor donny do, all on his own?
commies.... :lol:
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Didn't go the way you commie pukes wanted huh? Maybe the FIBs should be looking into the Briben crime family instead. They have the laptop with all the crime info on it. No need to make shit up like you commies always do. Enjoy the L you fucktards.
My uncle was a Marine too..fought the commie pukes in 'Nam..gave his life for his country and yet here you are pffffft.
 

xtsho

Well-Known Member
Didn't go the way you commie pukes wanted huh? Maybe the FIBs should be looking into the Briben crime family instead. They have the laptop with all the crime info on it. No need to make shit up like you commies always do. Enjoy the L you fucktards.
I just defecated and flushed you down the drain.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
One thing is for sure, Whitmer is a badass.

https://apnews.com/article/whitmer-kidnap-plot-trial-adam-fox-gretchen-whitmer-presidential-elections-violence-e2f805952538cdbef69c3dca82ddbfd8
Screen Shot 2022-04-09 at 6.08.11 PM.png
Outside the Michigan courthouse where a jury did not convictany of the four men charged with planning to kidnap Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, a defense lawyer said jurors saw the alleged plot as what it was: Dirty FBI tactics and “rough talk.”

The men — who were heard on audio during the trial talking about killing Whitmer, blowing up a bridge and other violence — didn’t say anything shocking, attorney Michael Hills said. He noted one of the defense witnesses he considered calling to testify planned to assert that he’s “heard worse from pregnant mothers up on the Capitol.”

“If I don’t like the governor and it’s rough talk, I can do that in our country. That’s what’s beautiful about this country. That’s what’s great about it,” Hills said. “So hurrah, freedom in America. It’s still here.”

But to others, Friday’s outcome following a weekslong trial was a chilling reminder that the political violence that is raging across the U.S. too often goes unpunished. From attacks on social media and elsewhere that disproportionately affect women lawmakers, to the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol and the plan to abduct Whitmer, people are increasingly angry and feeling emboldened to act on it, they say.

Whitmer, a Democrat, has blamed former President Donald Trump for stoking anger over COVID-19 restrictions and refusing to condemn right-wing extremists. On Friday, her office said people across the country are experiencing “a normalization” of violence. A Democratic state lawmaker said the threats posed won’t be taken seriously “until someone dies.”

“The plot to kidnap and kill a governor may seem like an anomaly. But we must be honest about what it really is: the result of violent, divisive rhetoric that is all too common across our country,” Whitmer’s chief of staff, JoAnne Huls, said in a statement. “There must be accountability and consequences for those who commit heinous crimes. Without accountability, extremists will be emboldened.”

Whitmer wasn’t a trial witness, didn’t attend the trial and has not directly commented on the proceedings, but on Saturday, she alluded to the trial’s outcome.

“I have often been asked why the heck do I want to keep doing this job. And after yesterday I’m sure we all have to ask that question maybe once or twice,” she said during a speech at the Michigan Democratic Party Endorsement Convention in Detroit. “But here’s the reason: Tough times call for tough people and we are going to get through this together.”

Four men — Adam Fox, Barry Croft Jr., Brandon Caserta and Daniel Harris — were arrested in October 2020. Federal prosecutors said they wanted to kidnap Whitmer because they were angry over pandemic restrictions she imposed, and saw her as a “tyrant” who needed to be removed.

The charges came at a particularly divisive time, with debate raging over the pandemic and just weeks before the 2020 presidential election between Trump and Joe Biden. Armed protests were occurring at the Michigan Capitol and elsewhere in the U.S., and in the streets of many cities, demonstrations over the police killing of George Floyd at times turned violent.

Prosecutors presented evidence at the federal trial in Grand Rapids, Michigan, from undercover agents, an FBI informant and two men who pleaded guilty to the plot. Jurors also read and heard secretly recorded conversations, violent social media posts and chat messages.

Defense attorneys argued that the men were entrapped by the FBI — pulled into an alleged plot they would never have participated in if not for the government and its informants luring them. They painted the men as wannabes who were frequently high and easily influenced, or in one case, a former member of the military who wanted to brush up on firearms training.

Before returning their verdicts, the jury said that after nearly five days of deliberations they could not agree unanimously on all 10 of the charges against the men.

Harris, 24, and Caserta, 33, were found not guilty of conspiracy. Harris also was acquitted of charges related to explosives and a gun.

The jury could not reach verdicts for Fox, 38, and Croft, 46, which means the government can put them on trial again.

U.S. Attorney Andrew Birge said after the verdicts that “We have two defendants that are awaiting trial and we’ll get back to work on that.”

Hills, who defended Caserta, said the outcome was a message to the government that the FBI’s actions were “unconscionable.” He said the federal government should “let it go” rather than take Croft and Fox to trial a second time.

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Republican, tweeted after the verdict that the “FBI and DOJ need a complete and total cleansing. ... All the rot must be removed and these agencies must be restored.”

Others were stunned by the jury’s decision, and said it set a dangerous example.

U.S. Rep. Debbie Dingell, a Democrat, called for an end to “the hatred and division in this country” and said she is “Deeply concerned that today’s decision in the Whitmer kidnapping trial will give people further license to choose violence and threats.”

Michigan Lt. Gov. Garlin Gilchrist called on elected officials, parents, teachers and others to stand up to “these hateful actions and teach our kids that there is a better way.”

“Our differences must be settled at the ballot box, not through violence,” he said. “We need to be honest and clear about what causes violence by extremists and do all we can to address the root cause of it.”

Michigan state Rep. Laurie Pohutsky, a Democrat, noted on Twitter that a man who threatened to kill her in 2020 was acquitted.

“The next time you ask why we can’t get good people to run for office, consider today’s verdict,” she said, adding, “This won’t be taken seriously until someone dies.”
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Round two. We get to see if they were able to decontaminate the jury of potential insurrectionists.

https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/michigan/2022/08/10/attorneys-reshape-arguments-whitmer-kidnap-plot-retrial-begins/10284733002/
Screen Shot 2022-08-10 at 5.12.12 PM.png
GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. — The retrial of two men accused of a violent plot to kidnap Gov. Gretchen Whitmer opened in federal court on Wednesday, with attorneys for both sides recasting and reframing their arguments four months after the first trial ended in a hung jury.

Federal prosecutors made a dramatic pivot, talking more directly from the outset of the trial about the involvement of informants and undercover agents in an effort to depict defendants Adam Fox, 39, and Barry Croft Jr., 46, as individuals with a concrete desire to overthrow the government and spark a second American Revolution — long before the COVID-19 pandemic, and before they landed on the radar of the federal government.

“This case doesn’t start because of COVID-19,” said Assistant U.S. Attorney Christopher O’Connor, one of the prosecutors representing the federal government in U.S. District Court in Grand Rapids.

“It starts several years before that, because what you’ll learn is that years before law enforcement started to investigate this plot, defendants believed elected officials were tyrants.”

U.S. District Judge Robert Jonker presided over the opening arguments on Wednesday. The retrial is the latest saga in one of the largest domestic terrorism cases in recent history, an effort that has been rife with controversy.

Jonker also oversaw the earlier trial against Croft and Fox, when two other defendants, Daniel Harris and Brandon Caserta, were acquitted on all charges. That jury, however, could not come to an agreement with respect to Croft and Fox and deadlocked on the charges against the two men.

Croft and Fox have been depicted by prosecutors as the ringleaders of the alleged plot, and they face charges of kidnapping conspiracy and conspiracy to use a weapon of mass destruction. Croft faces an additional charge of possessing an unregistered destructive device.

Two others charged in connection with the plot, Ty Garbin, 26, and Kaleb Franks, 28, have pleaded guilty to federal kidnapping conspiracy charges and are expected to testify again as the government's star witnesses.

O’Connor dug deeper into the defendants' lives before they came under investigation, talking about Croft’s years-long ties to violent extremist groups and history of posting anti-government commentary on social media and highlighting meetings and details that took place before spring 2020, when the COVID-19 pandemic created tensions and brought anti-government extremists out into the national spotlight.

According to the prosecutors, the defendants believed that kidnapping a sitting governor would be a means to spark chaos and remove people from office who they felt were overstepping their authority.

“They wanted to violently overthrow elected government officials because they believed those officials were tyrants constantly violating their rights,” O'Connor said.

“Fox and Croft believed the boogaloo would be accomplished through violence, not through voting.”

The defense attorneys added new emphasis on the role federal law enforcement agents played in the men’s alleged actions.

Croft’s attorney Joshua Blanchard cast his client, a Delaware resident, as someone who came on the FBI’s radar long before the kidnapping plot, catching agents attention with inflammatory Facebook posts and “saying mean things about the FBI.” Blanchard argued that the FBI viewed Croft as a threat and they were “looking for an opportunity to charge him with a crime.”

He grew emotional talking about the more than 600 days Croft has spent in jail, away from his family, since the men were arrested in October 2020. Croft, Blanchard told the jury, is “waiting for you to tell the FBI that the truth matters.”

“In our system of justice we rely on facts and we rely on truth and the way you do that is you return a verdict of not guilty.”

Much like the initial trial, Fox’s attorney Christopher Gibbons placed a heavy emphasis on the idea that everything his client said about committing violence and overthrowing the government was merely “big talk” by a destitute man living in the basement of a vacuum repair shop.

Gibbons said the defendants “wouldn’t hatch a plan on their own or wouldn’t reach a conspiracy on their own” and that it was the FBI that pushed them to the next steps.

“If the big talkers weren’t willing to hatch a plan on their own, the FBI would do it for them,” said Gibbons, later adding that the initial informant, who brought the defendants to the attention of federal law enforcement, was “the beginning, middle and end of this case.”

In their opening statement, the prosecution preemptively pushed back at those claims and any efforts by the defense to frame the case as entrapment, with O’Connor reiterating that “it wasn’t just talk.”

“Entrapment is a legal standard, not a feeling that you get about this investigation,” he said.
 
Top