Advanced Nutrients for Newb's?
- Thread starter frizzelrip
- Start date
BROBIE
Well-Known Member
Because you guys do too LOL. EXACTLY ....Ha hahahahahahah .... Towel calling the towel blue. What a retardHe is like Towlie, you say anything about AN in a thread and he shows up.
Don't forget to bring your Assclown!!!!(brobie)
chuck estevez
Well-Known Member
What do they call the division you work in at AN? Internet Assclown Rep?
BROBIE
Well-Known Member
That came from your brain this time ...I can tell
chuck estevez
Well-Known Member
Job Duties,
Seek Out anyone who hates on AN and fight with them,
May have to do the internet tough guy thing and threaten violence.
posts pics of AN products.
Never posts pics of actual grows
Change screen name often.
The bigger the ass hat, the better.
Seek Out anyone who hates on AN and fight with them,
May have to do the internet tough guy thing and threaten violence.
posts pics of AN products.
Never posts pics of actual grows
Change screen name often.
The bigger the ass hat, the better.
homebrewer
Well-Known Member
So just to be clear, you're saying that AN products contain fewer mineral salts than an EC meter might indicate?
BROBIE
Well-Known Member
Holy fuck child. Soup A reads 2.0 Soup B reads 1.0 - Soup A has abcd salts + cdefg Soup B has abcd salts only
BROBIE
Well-Known Member
You got me. I'm curling up in the fetal position now.................
homebrewer
Well-Known Member
In my test, I used each part in equal amounts totaling a target EC so I have no idea what you're saying above. You said earlier that an EC meter reads other things other than salts. So you're saying that AN's bottles are even more diluted than they appear?
BROBIE
Well-Known Member
Yes ..exactly. It sucks and Dyna is the only way to go. AN is for pussies. A real man uses Dyna Grow
chuck estevez
Well-Known Member
you won't get paid for that. just sayin!!!
BROBIE
Well-Known Member
just sayin!!!................. wow
BROBIE
Well-Known Member
Soup A = abcd + efg Soup B = abcd.
abcd = salt. EC = 1.0
efg = EC of 1 efg = everything else that blows dyna to shame.
abcd + efg = EC of 2
Simple.
chuck estevez
Well-Known Member
Mr.Head
Well-Known Member
Point?
If he's using the same pen to measure both solutions what's your issue?
You aren't explaining your point very well at all, I think you're trying to say that there is extra conductive material in Dyna's products that aren't nutrient salts? If that's so proof?
https://www.rollitup.org/t/ec-tds-ppm-what-are-the-differences.14207/ -source of quoted material
jondamon
Well-Known Member
I think you mean that you can't tell which soup contains what elements by EC.
Because if SoupA is EC 2 and SoupB is EC 2 then you don't know which soup had abcdefg and which soup only had abcd.
But if the user adds abcdefg into SoupA then "they" know it has abcdefg.
And the same for SoupB.
So to be fair your statement is pretty retarded.
Show me any tester that a grower would use to determine the nutrient make up of any mixed soup.
Hmmm all this talk if soups.
Anyone else hungry lol.
J
BROBIE
Well-Known Member
OK guys. Put down the pipe and concentrate. Soup A has everything that Soup B does + efg, where efg is also conductive.
How can you measure equal amounts of soup A & B to the same EC level (in this case 2) When soup A is more conductiv
Mr.Head
Well-Known Member
So what you're saying is NPK + Micro's essentially, how do you know what you're measuring? Well you don't, on either side of the argument it's about what grows better crops.
So you're saying that either AN or Dyna's measurements might be off due to the concentrations of each element of the nutrient, and that because the NPK + Micro's aren't exactly the same then the test is invalid? That's why you run the test... to find out which is more "complete" if he's only using the base and not using additives with one not the other then the test is fine.
It's about testing the companies recipe against another companies recipe. If 2.0 EC grows better crops with one brand then the other then the brand that won has a more complete nutrient solution. What's hard to grasp, we're not understanding because your point is ridiculous.
So you're saying that either AN or Dyna's measurements might be off due to the concentrations of each element of the nutrient, and that because the NPK + Micro's aren't exactly the same then the test is invalid? That's why you run the test... to find out which is more "complete" if he's only using the base and not using additives with one not the other then the test is fine.
It's about testing the companies recipe against another companies recipe. If 2.0 EC grows better crops with one brand then the other then the brand that won has a more complete nutrient solution. What's hard to grasp, we're not understanding because your point is ridiculous.
homebrewer
Well-Known Member
When I said I used EQUAL amounts of both parts, I was talking about VOLUME. Clearly you didn't read my comparison journal.