Keep It In Your Pants Herman!

[NoDrama]

Deprave,
I don't like Cain either. But that's what makes us libertarians better than the other two sides. You defend even your enemy if they're attacked unjustly. Otherwise, who defends our side when the same happens? I had a hunch Weiner lied and put up the pictures himself. But I gave him the benefit of doubt. I laughed when I was correct.

Don't you think Enemy is a bit too strong of a word? I like RP, and i will vote for him, but I don't see Cain or any of the other candidates as enemies, perhaps adversary is a better word.

 

[dukeanthony]

Anyone ever seen the SNL skit where no matter what the ugly guy said no matter how innocent was sexual harassment?

 

[MuyLocoNC]

i m thinking of roundly deleting ALL of your posts like this, as i suspect you are some sort of a spambot or paid poster.

you never have anything to say besides what you are told to say.

i read around, these are ALL regurgitated talking points. you are no better than the person they put in the 'spin room' after a presidential debate.

face it, herman cain, former washington lobbyist and chairman of the fed of KC, is a lousy, shitty, horrible candidate.

just like perry and bachmann before him, his tsar rose. and now, it is time for its inevitable fall.

if herman cain did not have to worry about this sexual harassment thing, he would be having to worry about the more illicit issue of his campaign funding.

get ready for candidate romney.

This is the FIRST time I've EVER played the race card and you're threatening to delete my posts...

We have to endure COUNTLESS and BASELESS posts by several members and nary a word is said by the libs. Could you be more hypocritical? So if a lib cries foul for a Democratic candidate a thousand times and that declaration is repeating by all the talking heads and newspapers that make up the MSM, it's just fine.

But if a Conservative brings up just one instance, the legitimacy of which seems to be supported by the evidence that has been provided so far, then we are obvious shills and partisan hacks? Nevermind the fact that their are no forum rules on RIU against being exactly that. And just because Hannity (who I don't watch) and Limbaugh (who I rarely listen to) happen to see the obvious, doesn't mean RIU members can't post the same conclusions. That's some straight up gestapo shit right there and you always make these threats against the Conservatives on the board, you are so biased you need to be stripped of your modship and banned from the site for good measure.

If that was the standard, EVERYTHING posted by the libs comes straight from MSNBC, the NY TIMES etc... so they must all be deleted as well. Your reaction proves my point, you libs think that prejudice and racism are the "protected" and "hallowed ground" of the left, and anyone that dares point out transgressions of your side are crossing the line. Jesus, do you hear yourself man?

 

[dukeanthony]

This wasnt a liberal hit job. Just reporting of the facts. He did have 2 sexual harassment suits. Wether the original suits have any substance is what i would like to know. Many times these cases are just setlled with no evidence

 

[Johnny Retro]

Prominent business heads in a company are very commonly accused of sexual harassment. You all have obviously never been around the business world. My estimate is it happens in 7/10 companies in the U.S. All it takes is a secretary, a good lying face, and the drive for money. The sad part is, the girls word is usually taken most seriously because of the world we live in today.
"hey, you look good today" boom sexual harassment case pending on your ass.

 

[dukeanthony]

Prominent business heads in a company are very commonly accused of sexual harassment. You all have obviously never been around the business world. My estimate is it happens in 7/10 companies in the U.S. All it takes is a secretary, a good lying face, and the drive for money. The sad part is, the girls word is usually taken most seriously because of the world we live in today.
"hey, you look good today" boom sexual harassment case pending on your ass.

Yup
And i dont like Cain
But thats how it is

 

[dukeanthony]

This is the FIRST time I've EVER played the race card and you're threatening to delete my posts...

We have to endure COUNTLESS and BASELESS posts by several members and nary a word is said by the libs. Could you be more hypocritical? So if a lib cries foul for a Democratic candidate a thousand times and that declaration is repeating by all the talking heads and newspapers that make up the MSM, it's just fine.

But if a Conservative brings up just one instance, the legitimacy of which seems to be supported by the evidence that has been provided so far, then we are obvious shills and partisan hacks? Nevermind the fact that their are no forum rules on RIU against being exactly that. And just because Hannity (who I don't watch) and Limbaugh (who I rarely listen to) happen to see the obvious, doesn't mean RIU members can't post the same conclusions. That's some straight up gestapo shit right there and you always make these threats against the Conservatives on the board, you are so biased you need to be stripped of your modship and banned from the site for good measure.

If that was the standard, EVERYTHING posted by the libs comes straight from MSNBC, the NY TIMES etc... so they must all be deleted as well. Your reaction proves my point, you libs think that prejudice and racism are the "protected" and "hallowed ground" of the left, and anyone that dares point out transgressions of your side are crossing the line. Jesus, do you hear yourself man?

Dont cry victim. You're a right wing bag of hate

 

[MuyLocoNC]

Dont cry victim. You're a right wing bag of hate

Nice try at labeling me, it's a flaccid attempt and discounts how many times I've OPENLY disagreed with the Republican and religous right's agenda.

I'm not crying about shit, you should learn to distinguish the difference between pointing out hypocrisy and bias and whining. By your definition, all the OWS protesters are left wing bags of hate just crying victim. Except you can't process that can you?

Following up on you and UB's theme about me being a Republican parrot, explain how I can be such a polar opposite to Hannity and Limbaugh on so many topics:

I've denounced religion and the agenda of the religous right at every turn.
I've stated my support for same sex marriage.
I've supported all but late term abortion.
I am an active member of Norml and donate to the cause here in NC.
I have supported Ron Paul on here so many times it's insane I have to bring it up.
I've been registered as an Independent since 1991 and voted for Perot.
I hammered Bush over Tarp at the time of it's enactment.

All this is a matter of record in my posts and my positions have never waivered. So UB can cast all the aspersions he wants, my politics are MY politics and other than disagreeing with some of them, your latest attack is total bullshit. Just because they overlap with the Republican pundits at times, hardly makes me a spambot or partisan hack. Anyone who makes that claim is a fucking liar and is discounting all the posts I've made, AND THEY KNOW IT. Apologize UB or you're a disgrace.

 

[dukeanthony]

I have a feeling if Obama agreed with your positions yiu would still hate him

 

[UncleBuck]

This is the FIRST time I've EVER played the race card and you're threatening to delete my posts...

do you even know how to read?

i did not threaten to delete your posts for playing the race card, i made the threat because i harbor very strong doubts that you are a paid poster, a human spambot.

i fucking hate spam.

 

[Johnny Retro]

I'm confused how ANYTHING he posted could be considered spam. Is it the fact that he gives reason's to why he believes in what he believes? Or is it cause you don't agree with what he is saying but cannot refute in a mature and sensible manner? Is MSNBC not giving you adequate information to post constructive conversation? Or do they just fill your head with how terrible the "right" is, there-for all you can talk about is that? Cause that's all I see outa your posts.

 

[Radiate]

"Baseless" accusations with no evidence don't require five-figure settlements and gag orders to refute. I smell bullshit. Adding to the stench is Cain's very abrupt 180 about his knowledge of the settlement. Didn't know about a settlement my ass. He must think we're extremely stupid or something.

Oh wait, some of us are. Nevermind.

 

[dukeanthony]

"Baseless" accusations with no evidence don't require five-figure settlements and gag orders to refute. I smell bullshit. Adding to the stench is Cain's very abrupt 180 about his knowledge of the settlement. Didn't know about a settlement my ass. He must think we're extremely stupid or something.

Oh wait, some of us are. Nevermind.

5 Figures is pretty low
A lot cheaper than taking it to court

 

[sync0s]

5 Figures is pretty low
A lot cheaper than taking it to court

I agree.

If he really sexually harassed them they wouldn't accept 5 figures and a gag order. They might take the 5 figures without the gag order, but not with both. Unless they were total idiots who had dumb ass lawyers who barely passed the bar exam.

 

[MuyLocoNC]

do you even know how to read?

i did not threaten to delete your posts for playing the race card, i made the threat because i harbor very strong doubts that you are a paid poster, a human spambot.

i fucking hate spam.

Let me assure you, I'm not a paid poster. They usually don't post 3 month long journals of their first illegal grow. I wouldn't even begin to know who would pay me anyways, I'm at odds with both sides on so many topics, neither side would embrace me, let alone pay me.

 

[tryingtogrow89]

You will never earn my respect herman shame on you!

 

[UncleBuck]

You will never earn my respect herman shame on you!

that's because you hate black people

 

[Dan Kone]

For fuck's sake! Two sexual harassment cases against him? What? Did he think the gag order on the victims would keep the story out of the media?

I'm much less worried about Cain's lack of macking skills and much more concerned with the fact that

A) he's a former lobbyist. We don't need a corporate lobbyist as president.

b) he's running a campaign financing scam where his publishing company is selling books to his campaign so he can pocket donor's money

c) in all likelihood he's going to be under investigation for violation of campaign financing laws for donations he's taking into his campaign from a nonprofit that is funded anonymously.

d) he want's to stop taxing the wealthy and shift the burden on to the middle class/poor.

Every thing about this guy suggests that if elected he will auction off the country to the highest bidder for his own personal gains. That's why people should really be against Cain becoming president.

 

[tryingtogrow89]

that's because you hate black people

Nope !
insiders and banksters no matter what color they be !
Only you would think so shallow, nothing was further from my mind...

 

[Johnny Retro]

He lobbied against smoking bans, lowering the legal driving blood alcohol level, and increasing minimum wage. Yea a real terrible guy

I'm also wondering where you got the idea where he wants to "stop taxing wealthy people"
I'm pretty sure he wants EVERYONE to pay the same amount, no special treatment. And that's a bad thing? lol