Rudy sinks Trump

[UncleBuck]

Can a sitting president be indicted? Heard it said they cannot under current DOJ policy. Impeachment only way out?

i'm sure the founding fathers meant for the executive to be unaccountable to the rule of law

 

[Bugeye]

i'm sure the founding fathers meant for the executive to be unaccountable to the rule of law

I don't know, my friend, check this out:
https://www.justice.gov/olc/opinion...enability-indictment-and-criminal-prosecution

 

[UncleBuck]

I don't know, my friend, check this out:
https://www.justice.gov/olc/opinion...enability-indictment-and-criminal-prosecution

don't care

no one is above the law

are you one of these cucks who think the law is only for little people?

 

[Moses Mobetta]

Equal application of the law! What a concept

 

[Bugeye]

don't care

no one is above the law

are you one of these cucks who think the law is only for little people?

Nah, I'm one of the little people just trying to understand the rules of the game. Seems like an indictment won't happen.

 

[UncleBuck]

Nah, I'm one of the little people just trying to understand the rules of the game. Seems like an indictment won't happen.

why wouldn't a criminal be indicted?

 

[Bugeye]

why wouldn't a criminal be indicted?

Ask the DOJ, not my policy.

 

[UncleBuck]

Ask the DOJ, not my policy.

if it is a policy, why did you try to pose it as a question?

 

[Bugeye]

if it is a policy, why did you try to pose it as a question?

Googled it after posing the question.

 

[londonfog]

I don't know, my friend, check this out:
https://www.justice.gov/olc/opinion...enability-indictment-and-criminal-prosecution

I think you need to go read up on impeachment. Clinton was impeached but was acquitted in the Senate.

 

[Bugeye]

I think you need to go read up on impeachment. Clinton was impeached but was acquitted in the Senate.

I'm sorry, I should study impeachment when my question is on indictment and criminal prosecution?

 

[Fogdog]

I'm sorry, I should study impeachment when my question is on indictment and criminal prosecution?

Are you really bragging about how Republican Congress would never impeach or remove Trump from office no matter what?

I agree that this is likely. But I don't see anything in that scenario to be proud of.

 

[londonfog]

I'm sorry, I should study impeachment when my question is on indictment and criminal prosecution?

Impeachment will help you understand the "indictment " and/or criminal prosecution process of a sitting president. Sorry that went over your head not really

 

[too larry]

Last night on Fox News Trumps new attorney, Rudy Giuliani, told Sean Hannity that Trump did know about the $130,000 payoff to Stormy Daniels, in fact, he reimbursed Michael Cohen the money.

Oh boy, the cat is out of the bag now, seeing as Trump (that lying sack of shit) has said he knew nothing of the payment.

I'll tell you what, with Trumps picks for attorneys, Mueller should have no problem putting Trump in jail.

Nice

He was getting it out there because it was going to leak. Doing what he was hired to do.

 

[londonfog]

He was getting it out there because it was going to leak. Doing what he was hired to do.

He create a bigger mess, because now Trump is saying he does not have his facts straight. This is going to get messy bigly

 

[Bugeye]

Are you really bragging about how Republican Congress would never impeach or remove Trump from office no matter what?

I agree that this is likely. But I don't see anything in that scenario to be proud of.

I think thou doth project too much.

 

[Bugeye]

Impeachment will help you understand the "indictment " and/or criminal prosecution process of a sitting president. Sorry that went over your head not really

I referenced the current DOJ policy on indictment of a sitting president, which was issued after the impeachment of Clinton. So I'm really trying to stay on current, relevant policy.

 

[londonfog]

I referenced the current DOJ policy on indictment of a sitting president, which was issued after the impeachment of Clinton. So I'm really trying to stay on current, relevant policy.

OMFG. Do you realize that is a legal opinion not fucking law

 

[Fogdog]

I think thou doth project too much.

Yet you trumpet it with glee.

You are an ass, bugs.

 

[Bugeye]

OMFG. Do you realize that is a legal opinion not fucking law

I believe I have described it accurately all along as DOJ policy. You seem to be saying that there is a substantial difference between a policy and a current opinion on the law at DOJ? I'm not aware of a distinction. Do you have an example where a DOJ policy and current opinion are in opposition?