UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i'm sure the founding fathers meant for the executive to be unaccountable to the rule of law
Rudy sinks Trump
- Thread starter Jimdamick
- Start date
Bugeye
Well-Known Member
I don't know, my friend, check this out:
https://www.justice.gov/olc/opinion/sitting-president’s-amenability-indictment-and-criminal-prosecution
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
don't care
no one is above the law
are you one of these cucks who think the law is only for little people?
Moses Mobetta
Well-Known Member
Equal application of the law! What a concept
Bugeye
Well-Known Member
Nah, I'm one of the little people just trying to understand the rules of the game. Seems like an indictment won't happen.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
why wouldn't a criminal be indicted?
Bugeye
Well-Known Member
Ask the DOJ, not my policy.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
if it is a policy, why did you try to pose it as a question?Ask the DOJ, not my policy.
Bugeye
Well-Known Member
Googled it after posing the question.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
I think you need to go read up on impeachment. Clinton was impeached but was acquitted in the Senate.
Bugeye
Well-Known Member
I'm sorry, I should study impeachment when my question is on indictment and criminal prosecution?
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Are you really bragging about how Republican Congress would never impeach or remove Trump from office no matter what?
I agree that this is likely. But I don't see anything in that scenario to be proud of.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
Impeachment will help you understand the "indictment " and/or criminal prosecution process of a sitting president. Sorry that went over your head not really
Last edited:
too larry
Well-Known Member
He was getting it out there because it was going to leak. Doing what he was hired to do.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
He create a bigger mess, because now Trump is saying he does not have his facts straight. This is going to get messy bigly
Bugeye
Well-Known Member
I think thou doth project too much.
Bugeye
Well-Known Member
I referenced the current DOJ policy on indictment of a sitting president, which was issued after the impeachment of Clinton. So I'm really trying to stay on current, relevant policy.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
OMFG. Do you realize that is a legal opinion not fucking law
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Bugeye
Well-Known Member
I believe I have described it accurately all along as DOJ policy. You seem to be saying that there is a substantial difference between a policy and a current opinion on the law at DOJ? I'm not aware of a distinction. Do you have an example where a DOJ policy and current opinion are in opposition?