yeah i was going to use two hans panels on the side so like the idea of having one of the other lights up top.Onyx will probably have better penetration...more light coming out of each reflector.
Area 51 will probably make denser flowers with all the added reds.
Both will probably yield high. Hard to say as they are both new.
yeah im not completely up to scratch on the DIY... will give ita go but would like something I know is going to work and then ease into the DIY...The onyx looks pretty tight. Finally sellers using good parts. The optics seem to be what most are using, look good enough.
I feel you on the Guinea pig thing. That's why i went diy, was starting to feel like the sellers test bitch.
thanks man.... yeah the lenses looked a bit iffy..I would recommend Area 51 from personal experience.
The Onyx looks interesting, but like you said, you don't want to end up a guinea pig.
My concern with Onyx is the cheap lenses and the actual size of the unit (13"x6").
I'm not sure it can fully cover the areas it claims to.
Good luck, whatever you get.
Its just not too hard to add some reds, I've ordered 5 Onyx after receiving my first one. I was thinking I'd order an a51 but I think I'll be making mine all Onyx.Onyx will probably have better penetration...more light coming out of each reflector.
Area 51 will probably make denser flowers with all the added reds.
Both will probably yield high. Hard to say as they are both new.
gonna bust out my killawatt meter just for you and hook it up to the one onyx I've received so far, bloom model. got 4 more (3 more bloom and 1 veg) tomorrow or the next day.I estimated the onyx grow (3000K) to be 29% efficient and it is $2.40/W (I havent seen actual kill-a-watt reading to verify power draw). The XM-L2 T4 7A3 is an awesome growing LED so those numbers are pretty good for a commercial lamp.
A51 SGS-190 is about 30% efficient and cost $4.30/W but it is 3700K. So Onyx is much cheaper/W and better spectrum.
Thanks for the info... the only thing Im hesitant about is that lense....I estimated the onyx grow (3000K) to be 29% efficient and it is $2.40/W (I havent seen actual kill-a-watt reading to verify power draw). The XM-L2 T4 7A3 is an awesome growing LED so those numbers are pretty good for a commercial lamp.
A51 SGS-190 is about 30% efficient and cost $4.30/W but it is 3700K. So Onyx is much cheaper/W and better spectrum.
I'm trying to understand just what it is that's so special about the a51 lenses.Thanks for the info... the only thing Im hesitant about is that lense....
Yeah perhaps i shouldve been clearer with my statement... the lenses are not clear.. its not so much the angle...The onyx uses diffused lenses that are hurting it's intensity. While a51 uses clear higher transparency ones. Based on the PAR charts that both a51 and onyx show, the XGS has a better spread and intensity all while using the 90*clear lenses vs either the onyx's 60*'s or 80*'s.
While the onyx has a smaller coverage and even with the 60* lens, is not as intense as the XGS. Now if you want to make it apples to apple with the onyx and their 80's...it even lower and shows no sign of coverage gain. It is hard to tell 100% the onyx's coverage because their chart is 3D, but it's close sought to see that a51 is ahead.