greenlikemoney
Well-Known Member
There was no concern, not even a smidgen.thanks for your concern
There was no concern, not even a smidgen.thanks for your concern
Did the doc actually test for H. Pylori or just start antibiotics assuming you had an HP infection?been waking up with stomach pains the last three days. got so bad yesterday i went to the ER. turns out i have an ulcer.
so i'm going dry until it heals up. no fried foods, no greasy foods, no spicy foods, no beer, no cannabis, and no cigarettes.
figured i'd go ahead and rearrange my sleep schedule while i was at it.
on antibiotics for the next three months to get rid of the h. pylorri. cutting out all my vices will speed the recovery so i can get back to my vice-laden ways ASAP.
i've replaced my vices with cereal and ice cream in the meantime. not as fun though.
what's the comparison between actually catching people breaking into cars and some guy that decides to follow a kid walking home because he's prejudice against young blacks?There was an eye witness to the Zimmerman beating, "MMA style". There was abundant physical evidence that Zimmerman was beaten.
Give it up Cheesy. There is nothing similar about OJ and Zimmerman.
Would you care to discuss Roderick Scott? No? I thought not.
Neither 17 year old was killed for any crime except assaulting a citizen. Arguably, Martin's killing was much more justifiable since Roderick Scott was never touched.what's the comparison between actually catching people breaking into cars and some guy that decides to follow a kid walking home because he's prejudice against young blacks?
lmao the kid in roderick scotts case was breaking into cars leading up to the shooting. Trayven was not. No there isn't any evidence that Zim Zam was overwhelmingly supportive of blacks. You can be suspicious of people without following them around like a creeper in the night. Just saying if I was walking and someone accuses me of being the cause of the siege on the community who is burglarizing and home invading I would beat their ass too.Neither 17 year old was killed for any crime except assaulting a citizen. Arguably, Martin's killing was much more justifiable since Roderick Scott was never touched.
There is ample evidence to contradict that Zimmerman was prejudiced against blacks. If anything, Zimmerman was overwhelmingly supportive of blacks.
In a neighborhood besieged by crime, burglaries, and home invasion robberies there is damn good reason to be suspicious of unfamiliar people in your neighborhood.
Thats what I thoughtFuck the news article.
I've read news articles that said people died from smoking a single joint.
Give me evidence, biotch.
Cervini, the kid killed by Roderick Scott, was not killed because he was breaking into cars. He was killed by Roderick because he attacked Roderick, though he never actually laid a hand on Roderick. Self defense.lmao the kid in roderick scotts case was breaking into cars leading up to the shooting. Trayven was not. No there isn't any evidence that Zim Zam was overwhelmingly supportive of blacks. You can be suspicious of people without following them around like a creeper in the night. Just saying if I was walking and someone accuses me of being the cause of the siege on the community who is burglarizing and home invading I would beat their ass too.
You mean the dispatcher who is not a sworn law enforcement officer - who's advice is as legally binding as yours?looks like he suffered some wounds after the unarmed teenage boy he was trying to detain fought back in self defense.
ZIMMERMAN: SHIT, HE'S RUNNING (<---super secret form of attack that unarmed black teenage boys employ)
DISPATCH: ARE YOU FOLLOWING HIM?
ZIMMERMAN: YEAH (<-----super secret form of self defense that vigilantes with two flashlights and a loaded gun employ)
DISPATCH: WE DON'T NEED YOU TO DO THAT (<-----bad instructions, to be disregarded. continue searching for scared, unarmed teenage boy fr 5 minutes with two flashlights and loaded gun)
just a classic case of a crazed negro boy attacking an innocent, harmless, and super helpful "community protection" type. they fall for that "running away from the creepy stranger who is following in the dark" bait every time.
so you're saying that martin had no right to fear for his life or great bodily harm when some stranger with a loaded gun followed him creepily in his car and then got out of his car and chased him as he ran?Neither 17 year old was killed for any crime except assaulting a citizen.
john goode never testified that he saw anyone punch anyone, he couldn't even identify who was who.There was an eye witness to the Zimmerman beating, "MMA style".
nice racist rant, white nationalist.The Roderick Scott case, on the other hand, is completely analogous except for the president pretending to give a shit about the 17 year old white kid, and the race hustlers pretending to give a shit about the 17 year old white kid, and the various social uprisings across the country to redistribute televisions sets in recompense for the life of the 17 year old white, and the various liberal news outlets across the country doing their editorial magic on the police recordings of the call by Mr. Scott to make him out to be a racist, dripping with the blood of an innocent young boy.
besides of course getting out of his car with two flashlights and a gun to chase him after he ran and bemoaning how those assholes were always getting away.BULLSHIT, there was zero evidence that Zim initiated the physical violence
running away is not a form of attack, ya racist fucking moron.plenty of evidence that Martin attacked Zim
yes it does.Creepy dude following you does not justify a physical attack, sorry.
DING, DING, DING, we have a winner!besides of course getting out of his car with two flashlights and a gun to chase him after he ran and bemoaning how those assholes were always getting away.
that sounds like initiating to me. running away sure isn;t initiating.
running away is not a form of attack, ya racist fucking moron.
yes it does.
if a stranger follows you in the dark like that and you fear for your life or great bodily harm, you sure as shit are allowed to end their life.
it's called self preservation and self defense.
dumb racist fucking hick.
Yeah, how'd that work out?martin had every right to fear for his life, and was thus entitled to kill zimmerman at that point. not assault, self defense.
Nah you are not a racistDING, DING, DING, we have a winner!
Officially, the first time in the years I've been here that you've straight up called me a racist.
You've used me as an example of one of your opponents that you don't call a racist. Never again. There was ZERO racial implications in ANYTHING I've written. You could insert two people of any race of your choosing, including two guys of the same race and it wouldn't affect my assertions or conclusions.
I'll chalk it up to you being grumpy over your medical restrictions. However, you're still a dick for even trying that shit with me.
Apperson called 911 again two days later to report that Zimmerman was waiting outside his workplace. Police responded and interviewed Zimmerman, who told officers he was visiting a doctor’s office in the Waymont Court plaza.So, has Georgie been charged with anything over this last alleged incident?
No?
Maybe lefties should learn to just mind their own fucking business.
You know what they call that in court?Apperson called 911 again two days later to report that Zimmerman was waiting outside his workplace. Police responded and interviewed Zimmerman, who told officers he was visiting a doctor’s office in the Waymont Court plaza.
The man declined to press charges against Zimmerman, who was found not guilty in the February 2012 shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin.
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/george-zimmerman-threatens-kill-driver-road-rage-incident-police-article-1.1937738#ixzz3DNa4yugN