We have come full circle. Nope. OJ was found not guilty, but I consider him a murderer. Zim was found not guilty, and I consider him innocent.
There is nothing similar about the two cases:
Were Ron Goldman and Nicole Simpson murdered? Yes.
Did OJ call the police before decapitating them and report their furtive movements in the neighborhood? No.
Did OJ wait for the police after decapitating them and admit that he killed them? No.
Did OJ have a broken nose and head injuries to sustain his claim of self defense? No.
Did OJ claim self defense? No.
Are you displaying your shallow intellect by trying to draw similarities between these cases? Yes.
The Roderick Scott case, on the other hand, is completely analogous except for the president pretending to give a shit about the 17 year old white kid, and the race hustlers pretending to give a shit about the 17 year old white kid, and the various social uprisings across the country to redistribute televisions sets in recompense for the life of the 17 year old white, and the various liberal news outlets across the country doing their editorial magic on the police recordings of the call by Mr. Scott to make him out to be a racist, dripping with the blood of an innocent young boy.
