Georgie is in the news again

UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
He is still toting his gun. And this is like the 3rd time he made threatening gestures to someone.
I wonder what gestures he was making when he confronted Martin?
Probably showed him his gun and threatened to shoot him as well.
Click to expand...
never really thought of that, but it fits his M.O. perfectly.
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
So OJ Simpson is not a murderer either?
Click to expand...
No, OJ is a murderer. There is no comparison between OJ and Zimmerman.

If you want a good comparison, try this:

http://rochester.twcnews.com/content/news/490926/jury-finds-roderick-scott-not-guilty/

Not guilty: The verdict in the manslaughter trial of Roderick Scott. After more than 19 hours of deliberations over two days, a jury acquitted the Greece man in the shooting death of Christopher Cervini, 17, last April.

"I just want to say thank you to the people who believed in me, who stood by me,” Scott said following the verdict. “I still have my regrets for the Cervini family; it's still an unfortunate situation for them. I am happy that at least this chapter is over."

As deliberations dragged on over two days and the jury asked for testimony to be read back, Scott admits he didn't know how it would all turn out.

"I was nervous of course,” he said. “You never know what direction this whole thing is going to turn, so I have no idea. But it worked out and I feel that justice (was) served today."
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
I love the completely transparent and racist ignoring of the Roderick Scott case, which is completely analogous to Zimmerman's.
Click to expand...
not analogous in any way whatsoever, since the victim in that case WAS committing a crime, scott CLEARLY identified himself, and multiple eyewitnesses all corroborate that the victim attacked.

words have meanings, ya stupid white nationalist.
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
not analogous in any way whatsoever, since the victim in that case WAS committing a crime, scott CLEARLY identified himself, and multiple eyewitnesses all corroborate that the victim attacked.

words have meanings, ya stupid white nationalist.
Click to expand...
Indeed, words do have meaning despite you wanting desperately to pervert their meaning. Cervini/Martin both did exactly the same thing, they attacked a guy who rightly defended himself. Martin's assault on Zimmerman was nearly lethal, while Cervini never laid a hand on Scott. I know it is painful to you racists but a white man (even a "white hispanic") has the same right to defend himself against a vicious assault by a black man as a black man does against a white man.

Afterwards the prosecutor opined, “I just hope it’s not a message to this community… that you have the right to shoot an unarmed 17-year-old kid for breaking into a car.” The problem is that Mr. Scott did not shoot young Christopher Cervini for breaking into his car, but for attacking him. While the Cervini family may now be in much pain over the loss of their son, he brought himself to his tragic end through a series of terrible choices. Roderick Scott had every right to protect himself; he did what he should have… and a jury of his peers agreed.
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
Indeed, words do have meaning despite you wanting desperately to pervert their meaning. Cervini/Martin both did exactly the same thing, they attacked a guy who rightly defended himself. Martin's assault on Zimmerman was nearly lethal, while Cervini never laid a hand on Scott. I know it is painful to you racists but a white man (even a "white hispanic") has the same right to defend himself against a vicious assault by a black man as a black man does against a white man.

Afterwards the prosecutor opined, “I just hope it’s not a message to this community… that you have the right to shoot an unarmed 17-year-old kid for breaking into a car.” The problem is that Mr. Scott did not shoot young Christopher Cervini for breaking into his car, but for attacking him. While the Cervini family may now be in much pain over the loss of their son, he brought himself to his tragic end through a series of terrible choices. Roderick Scott had every right to protect himself; he did what he should have… and a jury of his peers agreed.
Click to expand...
So Martin attacked Zimmerman with no pravocation and you believe that why?
 
earnest_voice

earnest_voice

Well-Known Member
althor said:
http://rollitup.org/t/just-a-matter-of-time.844485/

I have this really twisted uncle. He is much older now and suffering from extreme dementia.
My whole life growing up, he was one of the meanest, nastiest, SOBs you could imagine.
He absolutely loved his guns and weapons and ALWAYS tried to insinuate himself into trouble.
Like this idiot Zimmerman, he would go around acting like king of the hill and loved to take security type jobs and volunteer for the neighborhood watch, etc. There was no doubt to anyone who knew him, he had one goal. He wanted to bag himself a legal kill. Of course, he was much too pussy to join the military.
He eventually got his greatest desire, a death. It wasn't like he had planned, I am sure. He didn't get the opportunity to smoke someone with his pistol. He was driving down the expressway when a young black male tried to run across. Ran right out in front of my uncle. My uncle ran over him and killed him.
It changed my uncle's life. It BROKE him. He didn't leave his house for months, and it was not uncommon during this time for him to break down into tears. He finally realized that killing someone was a BAD thing.

This is what bothered me the MOST about that piece of shit Zimmerman. He had no reckoning with himself. He actually seems proud that he killed someone and he is right back out on the streets looking for his next victim.
The guy is a straight up monster.
Click to expand...
I wonder what Zimmermans Myers Briggs evaluation yielded?

I'm sure they administer those test to potential police recruits, I'm read zimmerman applied to be po'po before that test would've deemed his personality type as being suitable/unsuitable, probably the latter.
 
TakeTheTicket

TakeTheTicket

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
Indeed, words do have meaning despite you wanting desperately to pervert their meaning. Cervini/Martin both did exactly the same thing, they attacked a guy who rightly defended himself. Martin's assault on Zimmerman was nearly lethal, while Cervini never laid a hand on Scott. I know it is painful to you racists but a white man (even a "white hispanic") has the same right to defend himself against a vicious assault by a black man as a black man does against a white man.

Afterwards the prosecutor opined, “I just hope it’s not a message to this community… that you have the right to shoot an unarmed 17-year-old kid for breaking into a car.” The problem is that Mr. Scott did not shoot young Christopher Cervini for breaking into his car, but for attacking him. While the Cervini family may now be in much pain over the loss of their son, he brought himself to his tragic end through a series of terrible choices. Roderick Scott had every right to protect himself; he did what he should have… and a jury of his peers agreed.
Click to expand...
Zimmerman harasses Martin, follows him, chases him, and provokes a fight. He starts to lose that fight, and pulls out a gun. He's a murderer. Was Martin obligated to trust Zimmerman because Zimmerman has light skin? If someone was following me around a place that I had every right to be at, I would be very alarmed too. If that person started chasing me, you're damn right I'd feel the need to rid myself of the person chasing me with whatever means necessary. Martin stood his ground.

I bet if this was a case of "black man stalks white man" you'd be thinking differently eh?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
Indeed, words do have meaning despite you wanting desperately to pervert their meaning. Cervini/Martin both did exactly the same thing, they attacked a guy who rightly defended himself. Martin's assault on Zimmerman was nearly lethal, while Cervini never laid a hand on Scott. I know it is painful to you racists but a white man (even a "white hispanic") has the same right to defend himself against a vicious assault by a black man as a black man does against a white man.

Afterwards the prosecutor opined, “I just hope it’s not a message to this community… that you have the right to shoot an unarmed 17-year-old kid for breaking into a car.” The problem is that Mr. Scott did not shoot young Christopher Cervini for breaking into his car, but for attacking him. While the Cervini family may now be in much pain over the loss of their son, he brought himself to his tragic end through a series of terrible choices. Roderick Scott had every right to protect himself; he did what he should have… and a jury of his peers agreed.
Click to expand...
there is zero evidence that martin attacked zimmerman, and a ton of evidence that zimmerman attacked martin.

if you were only ignoring reality, that would be one thing, but you are inverting reality to suit your white nationalist "be afraid of blacks" worldview.

martin had every right to defend himself from a creepy starnger following him in the dark for no apparent reason, we all do. thus anything martin did clearly falls under self defense, not assault.

you racist fucking moron.
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
there is zero evidence that martin attacked zimmerman, and a ton of evidence that zimmerman attacked martin.

if you were only ignoring reality, that would be one thing, but you are inverting reality to suit your white nationalist "be afraid of blacks" worldview.

martin had every right to defend himself from a creepy starnger following him in the dark for no apparent reason, we all do. thus anything martin did clearly falls under self defense, not assault.

you racist fucking moron.
Click to expand...
Oh no.

For no reason at all.
Martin Unprovoked attacked Zimmerman.
He "chimped" out as they are saying.

For no reason at all. Poor George had no history of harassing blacks in his neighborhood.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top