Climate Change.... survey, just a reason to raise your taxes?

Rob Roy · Jul 26, 2014

UncleBuck said:
i hate it when the government sends me free money for lowering my electric bill.

what a scam this "climate change" thing is.

If the money wasn't yours to begin with, they are just sending you money they stole from somebody else or money they created as debt. Either way, you need to clean the bathroom.

MuyLocoNC · Jul 26, 2014

UncleBuck said:
i hate it when the government sends me free money for lowering my electric bill.

what a scam this "climate change" thing is.

Rob Roy beat me to it.

Are those the same magical, free SUBSIDEEZ that originate out of thin air for ObamaCare? Yeah, we need to find the source of all this "free money". It could solve all our national debt problems and completely eliminate our unfunded liabilities, both of which totally don't exist anyways.

MuyLocoNC · Jul 26, 2014

Padawanbater2 said:
Yeah, that's why you're a dumbass..

So what you're saying is, if enough doctors diagnosed you with an invisible arm projecting from your forehead, you'd elect to undergo the gerbil up the ass/take all my money treatment?

You sir, are truly a man of science.

Padawanbater2 · Jul 26, 2014

MuyLocoNC said:
So what you're saying is, if enough doctors diagnosed you with an invisible arm projecting from your forehead, you'd elect to undergo the gerbil up the ass/take all my money treatment?

You sir, are truly a man of science.

Cancer is a better analogy, but I bet you'd be just as serious about fixing it if it was stage 1, 2, 3 or 4..

Not climate change though. You're willing to wait til you get allll the way to stage 4, walk in smoking a cigarette, the doc scolds you and tells you you're a fucking idiot, you come back with "well I didn't know for sure how bad it was..."

Yeah, that's your "defense" against climate change. Brilliant.

UncleBuck · Jul 26, 2014

Rob Roy said:
If the money wasn't yours to begin with, they are just sending you money they stole from somebody else or money they created as debt. Either way, you need to clean the bathroom.

not stolen since you have to voluntarily sign a document allowing them to take it.

MuyLocoNC · Jul 26, 2014

UncleBuck said:
not stolen since you have to voluntarily sign a document allowing them to take it.

What a load of shit. I could provide services and/or products to fellow citizens without ever signing anything for the Federal government. I could support myself for years with the fruits of my labor and skill, with thousands of satisfied customers

I think it's fair to say the gub'ment would still forcefully seek back taxes, penalties, interest and criminal prosecution, despite the nonexistence of a signed document.

Or does this flaccid argument you present, suffice as a defense against them?

It was just as stupid the last 50 times we've seen you vomit out this liberal talking point.

UncleBuck · Jul 26, 2014

MuyLocoNC said:
What a load of shit. I could provide services and/or products to fellow citizens without ever signing anything for the Federal government. I could support myself for years with the fruits of my labor and skill, with thousands of satisfied customers

I think it's fair to say the gub'ment would still forcefully seek back taxes, penalties, interest and criminal prosecution, despite the nonexistence of a signed document.

Or does this flaccid argument you present, suffice as a defense against them?

It was just as stupid the last 50 times we've seen you vomit out this liberal talking point.

so people voluntarily sign a form that allows the government to withhold taxes, then you call those withholdings stolen?

makes no sense.

54-40 victory on your part, which means i win 51-47.

MuyLocoNC · Jul 26, 2014

Padawanbater2 said:
Cancer is a better analogy, but I bet you'd be just as serious about fixing it if it was stage 1, 2, 3 or 4..

Not climate change though. You're willing to wait til you get allll the way to stage 4, walk in smoking a cigarette, the doc scolds you and tells you you're a fucking idiot, you come back with "well I didn't know for sure how bad it was..."

Yeah, that's your "defense" against climate change. Brilliant.

Actually, my analogy is superior, since an invisible arm projecting from your forehead is far more plausible than the MMGW theory you espouse.

Red1966 · Jul 26, 2014

Padawanbater2 said:
If 97% of doctors you went to told you you had a condition that required immediate medical treatment or you'd die, would you go with the >~3% who say you're just fine?

"Environmental protection and economic prosperity are not mutually exclusive goals. The EPA has not always been able to reach a state of perfect equilibrium, I think we'll all agree to that. It has however consistently struck a reasonable balance that protects both the health of the environment and the health of the economy. From 1980 to 2012, the total emissions in the United States of six common air pollutants in the United States dropped 67%. At the same time, our population grew by 38%. Our energy consumption increased by 27% and our GDP more than doubled in constant dollars. So more people, consuming more energy, admitted much less pollution without sacrificing economic growth."

-Christine Todd Whitman

But 97% is a bullshit number. You know it is, but just keep repeating the lie. So why should we listen to anything you have to say, when we know you're a liar?

UncleBuck · Jul 26, 2014

Red1966 said:
So why should we listen to anything you have to say, when we know you're a liar?

ahem.

UncleBuck · Jul 26, 2014

MuyLocoNC said:
Actually, my analogy is superior, since an invisible arm projecting from your forehead is far more plausible than the MMGW theory you espouse.

good win, i give you the win by a 54-40 margin.

which of course means you lose by several points.

MuyLocoNC · Jul 26, 2014

UncleBuck said:
so people voluntarily sign a form that allows the government to withhold taxes, then you call those withholdings stolen?

makes no sense.

54-40 victory on your part, which means i win 51-47.

Makes no sense just like calling the signing of a piece of paper "voluntary" when the exact same result will occur (plus punishment) if you don't sign it.

Or are you saying the gub'ment doesn't pursue "under the table" businesses?

Now THAT'S an illegal executive order I can get behind.

MuyLocoNC · Jul 26, 2014

UncleBuck said:
good win, i give you the win by a 54-40 margin.

which of course means you lose by several points.

Oh cupcake, are we still schlepping that discredited claim around? It must suck that for two years it's the ONLY dead horse you've got to beat into the ground at me. Especially when it's a specious claim at best.

UncleBuck · Jul 26, 2014

MuyLocoNC said:
Makes no sense just like calling the signing of a piece of paper "voluntary" when the exact same result will occur (plus punishment) if you don't sign it.

makes a lot of sense to call it voluntary since no one is ever forcing you to sign it. you can just go on welfare instead.

isn't welfare supposed to be lavish living?

UncleBuck · Jul 26, 2014

MuyLocoNC said:
Oh cupcake, are we still schlepping that discredited claim around?

your reality denial is no match for recorded history.

MuyLocoNC said:
Pew Research center has Romney ahead 49-45, it's closer to 54-40. Yup, that sounds about right.

behold, the full unedited quote in all its glory, of you denying reality over and over again to come to your preconceived conclusion.

yes, virginia. muylocoNC is a retarded moron.

MuyLocoNC · Jul 26, 2014

UncleBuck said:
your reality denial is no match for recorded history.

behold, the full unedited quote in all its glory, of you denying reality over and over again to come to your preconceived conclusion.

yes, virginia. muylocoNC is a retarded moron.

Ah, someone still doesn't understand that the link on quote proves the date it was posted. Hmm, that's October 9th. Was the election on October 10th that year? No, then you can't prove it was incorrect AT THE TIME IT WAS POSTED. Your own quote dispels your claim.

See how that works? It's called reality, try some.

UncleBuck · Jul 26, 2014

MuyLocoNC said:
Ah, someone still doesn't understand that the link on quote proves the
date it was posted. Hmm, that's October 9th. Was the election on October 10th that year? No, then you can't prove it was incorrect AT THE TIME IT WAS POSTED. Your own quote dispels your claim.

See how that works? It's called reality, try some.

romney was never ahead, you retard.

you took an outlier and then did the retard dance with it off to the land of make believe.

Commander Strax · Jul 27, 2014

sheskunk · Jul 27, 2014

UncleBuck said:
makes a lot of sense to call it voluntary since no one is ever forcing you to sign it. you can just go on welfare instead.

isn't welfare supposed to be lavish living?

Ask Skytard. She knows.

ttystikk · Jul 27, 2014

Well, I believe that climate change is happening. I don't think it cares if it's tax deductible. What do you suppose we do about it?

I'm working on cutting the power needed to grow pot inside by a factor of four. I figured it was a good start.

Climate Change.... survey, just a reason to raise your taxes?

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member