Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
"Approximately 4,715 acres of prime farmland soil would be directly impacted by construction of the proposed pipeline."
"The proposed Project would impact waterbodies across the states of Montana, South Dakota, and Nebraska. The proposed Project route would avoid surface water whenever possible; however, the proposed Project route would still cross approximately 1,073 waterbodies, including 56 perennial rivers and streams, as well as approximately 25 miles of mapped floodplains."
http://keystonepipeline-xl.state.gov/documents/organization/205719.pdf
The potential environmental issues go from ES-8 - ES-11 in that report from the State Dept., and that doesn't include the endangered animals risk, so when you say they say it's 100% safe, that's a lie. That's not what the State Dept. reports.
"The proposed Project would impact waterbodies across the states of Montana, South Dakota, and Nebraska. The proposed Project route would avoid surface water whenever possible; however, the proposed Project route would still cross approximately 1,073 waterbodies, including 56 perennial rivers and streams, as well as approximately 25 miles of mapped floodplains."
http://keystonepipeline-xl.state.gov/documents/organization/205719.pdf
The potential environmental issues go from ES-8 - ES-11 in that report from the State Dept., and that doesn't include the endangered animals risk, so when you say they say it's 100% safe, that's a lie. That's not what the State Dept. reports.
Last edited: