Always wondered this;

[NietzscheKeen]

I'm pretty sure he is a troll... or at least should be labeled as one. I blocked him weeks ago because I got so sick of his impertinent platitudes. He is such a cliche; the guy that knows one subject, and not very well I should add, and gains a hideous level of hubris.

 

[blacksun]

Oh God... Don't tell me he is equivocating shit and spouting his arrogant nonsense again.

This dickhead doesn't know the difference between propositional logic and computer programming. Also he touts his "math skills" but what he really means is his community college computer programming knowledge. That's not math my friend, and in the vague sense that it can be considered math... it is basic math at best. Please don't waste any more time on him.
We had a long conversation where I was berated post after post for trying to explain Logic to him and to get him to clarify the point he was trying to get across. He thinks he knows everything and has closed off any new information.

Dang, I probably should have read this before that last post, I guess I'm a little slow too. I did get the vibe that there was no point in replying to him, especially after he was arguing a point against my post that one, wasn't even arguable, two, made less than no sense, and three, I had already acknowledged a page before, which is probably the silliest thing he did out of the three. Why would he even try to argue if he isn't going to bother to read?...who knows.

 

[NietzscheKeen]

Cool video that you posted. Bye Bye Earth! I thought Mars had a cool new orbit at the end, not sure how long it would last.

 

[fb360]

Oh God... Don't tell me he is equivocating shit and spouting his arrogant nonsense again.

This dickhead doesn't know the difference between propositional logic and computer programming. Also he touts his "math skills" but what he really means is his community college computer programming knowledge. That's not math my friend, and in the vague sense that it can be considered math... it is basic math at best. Please don't waste any more time on him.
We had a long conversation where I was berated post after post for trying to explain Logic to him and to get him to clarify the point he was trying to get across. He thinks he knows everything and has closed off any new information.

The irony LOL.

Please post that thread.

As usual in these matters, it seems "keeping an open mind" means "agree with me or shut up".

You've came in with nothing but nonsensical caterwaul and so far have only been able to answer questions with bellyaching hyperbole from a jaded high horse. You appear to be better at inane self-aggrandization than you are at refuting or explaining anything. We do not know your credentials or qualifications and can only judge you by what you have presented. Abusive attacks are a poor substitute for articulation, but seem to be your only skill-set. I do not mean to belittle you but I can only size you up based on how big you have chosen to appear.

I never said he was wrong you illiterate buffoon. I told him to stop telling people who think it is instantaneous that it can't possibly be.
You belittle yourself with that highly hypocritical post lol

I'm pretty sure I even said I agreed with him, and if I haven't yet, I do agree that it would be the speed of light. Maybe when you learn how to read, you can reply to me in manner that makes any sense


The best part is that everyone trying to qualify and describe themselves as intelligent (NietzscheKeen) is blatantly illiterate. Quite comical.

 

[Kite High]

well this should do it

 

[fb360]

well this should do it

You guys are so boring tonight I'll even reply to you KiteHigh.

Want to teach Neitz some calculus? dx/dt = infinity shit

I have seen this with engineers before. They are good at applied science but don't necessarily know (or care about) the actual philosophy of science and the critical thinking that is necessary to let go of these flawed concept of facts, theories, truth and opinion, assumptions and whatever else he chooses to conflate.

Holy shit the irony! You just told 2 individuals on Post 9 that it wasn't instantaneous without describing the nature of your statement at all; just a "nop3".

 

[Kite High]

ahh but not to answer the question...you play ball in LA don't you

 

[fb360]

ahh but not to answer the question...you play ball in LA don't you

Sure why not

 

[Kite High]

= dv or quite simply v

now answer mine...uhuh no search engine use

 

[Kite High]

Sure why not

knew it..Dodger

 

[fb360]

= dv or quite simply v

now answer mine...uhuh no search engine use

velocity = dx/dt

dv = delta velocity =/= dx/dt

its ddx/dt/dt or better known as acceleration.

I have no idea what you are trying to say...

 

[Kite High]

I FOUND YOU!!

 

[Kite High]

VELOCITY MR. MATH

NOT ACCELERATION

 

[fb360]

VELOCITY MR. MATH

NOT ACCELERATION

wtf are you talking about. stop trying to troll the troll, you're gonna start creatin black holes n shit

I already told you...

Distance = x
Velocity = dx/dt
Acceleration = dv/dt

They are very simple equations man

 

[Kite High]

yes I know and the answer is VELOCITY not ACCELERATION your math skills are in question now as well as your comprehension of the language English

And I take it you do not know anything other than some algebraic 101 formulations or you would at least know the equation you spout with denotes VELOCITY...not acceleration dumbass

let me help you
In physics, acceleration is the rate at which the velocity of a body changes with time.In kinematics, velocity is the rate of change of the position of an object, equivalent to a specification of its speed and direction of motion.

 

[fb360]

yes I know and the answer is VELOCITY not ACCELERATION your math skills are in question now as well as your comprehension of the language English

And I take it you do not know anything other than some algebraic 101 formulations or you would at least know the equation you spout with denotes VELOCITY...not acceleration dumbass

let me help you
In physics, acceleration is the rate at which the velocity of a body changes with time.In kinematics, velocity is the rate of change of the position of an object, equivalent to a specification of its speed and direction of motion.

dx/dt is velocity wow. man this subforum really is something else. You guys are fun though so I let it slide sometimes

dx/dt is essentially the question of the thread. In fact, the main question is whether dg/dt = infinity or c if the sun just disappeared

"The irony of your meme is off the charts" <- is too much? Has to be one of the most benign attacks in this thread

 

[sunni]

while I can understand issues in politics, science and other areas can be something we can disagree about , we should not argue or have personal attacks on other members, science is amazing and we should therefore treat it as such hold your head up high guys and stop with the bullshit. Discuss and politely debate if you cannot you and whomever cannot debate properly without pulling in the pissing contest will have a wonderful chit chat with me.

 

[Kite High]

while I can understand issues in politics, science and other areas can be something we can disagree about , we should not argue or have personal attacks on other members, science is amazing and we should therefore treat it as such hold your head up high guys and stop with the bullshit. Discuss and politely debate if you cannot you and whomever cannot debate properly without pulling in the pissing contest will have a wonderful chit chat with me.

I'll chit chat with you any time sweetness...am done with this self absorbed savant

 

[Heisenberg]

I never said he was wrong you illiterate buffoon. I told him to stop telling people who think it is instantaneous that it can't possibly be.
You belittle yourself with that highly hypocritical post lol

I'm pretty sure I even said I agreed with him, and if I haven't yet, I do agree that it would be the speed of light. Maybe when you learn how to read, you can reply to me in manner that makes any sense

This is a great example of the high-horsed hyperbole I referred to. It seems to be your favorite, and perhaps only, trick. You need to mischaracterized my post before you can manage to attack it. Obviously I can read. I think maybe you meant to insult my comprehension ability, which again points to your poor articulation skills. You have a hard time saying what you mean. Has your position really retreated to schoolyard insults? And all over something you ultimately agree with. You must be a ray of sunshine to those who know you IRL. Like spending time with a rainbow I'm sure; A lonely, pretentious rainbow who's brain can only overcome feelings of inferiority by manufacturing petty, inaccurate insults parlayed into masturbatory hubris.

Meanwhile all MP has done is give an answer based on disciplined and careful examination of the best available evidence to date, with the understanding that the answer is subject to correction and improvement upon discovery of new evidence. All scientific answers come with error bars at the end, or else it isn't science. What you have done is demonstrate that you will be contentious even if you agree, and enjoy the exchange of insults because your brain is impressed by mockery rather than concerned with improving itself. This is an aspect of your personality that I suspect you will continue to hammer home, as if you wont be satisfied until you destroy all semblance of an informed and intelligent exchange.

 

[fb360]

This is a great example of the high-horsed hyperbole I refereed to. It seems to be your favorite, and perhaps only, trick. You need to mischaracterized my post before you can manage to attack it. Obviously I can read. I think maybe you meant to insult my comprehension ability, which again points to your poor articulation skills.

What you have done is demonstrate that you will be contentious even if you agree, and enjoy the exchange of insults because your brain is impressed by mockery rather than concerned with improving itself. This is an aspect of your personality that I suspect you will continue to hammer home, as if you wont be satisfied until you destroy all semblance of an informed and intelligent exchange.

If you had read this thread you would have seen my answer on page 2 and would have comprehended that I never disagreed with his thought. I only disagreed with his telling others that it can't be instantaneous and then it blew up.

So you understand how I work now I see. Sike. Dude I was drunk and was bored and drama happened and I went with it. I don't come on here to have intelligent conversations about science. Why would I? That would be highly unintelligent as there are forums made for that with members who are geared exactly for those conversations. I don't start attacks but if I'm attacked, as I was, I have no problem doing it back, especially on this forum where many troll

I bet I spend more time self educating per day than you. At this moment I am only taking a small break from a circuit forum to respond to you...

Again, to reiterate, your previous post to me made absolutely no sense as your claims are invalid. How's that for articulation

e; Seeing as how you are still editing...
It's funny cuz no matter how well you try to articulate, when the basis of your statement is false, none of it matters, there is no partial credit.

Plus you act like I was the only one making schoolyard insults; comical; especially as you attempt to insult me but then erase it