Kite High
Well-Known Member
you do not even know what you write...you deserve no more of my time...may your ego implode upon you in your lonely bubbleWant to teach Neitz some calculus? dx/dt = infinity shit
you do not even know what you write...you deserve no more of my time...may your ego implode upon you in your lonely bubbleWant to teach Neitz some calculus? dx/dt = infinity shit
So it is okay to act like an ass on these forums because you have other places to go? I suppose you act like a prince elsewhere. More likely is that you realize you acted like an ass and rather than admit or defend, you suggest the excuse of not expecting any better of yourself. You thought you had the upper hand because you did not know of the pulsar experiments, and rather than update and improve your knowledge, you double down on ignorance. It seems your principals of conduct wax and wane depending on your knowledge of the subject. When intellect fails, clever insults will suffice. You are willing to settle for less if you can convince yourself that it actually means you are better. The alcohol explains a bit of why you think things are a contest of who's better, and then say things that don't quite make sense. For example, saying that experiments which confirm gravity traveling at C would compromise 'the integrity of our physics'.If you had read this thread you would have seen my answer on page 2 and would have comprehended that I never disagreed with his thought. I only disagreed with his telling others that it can't be instantaneous and then it blew up.
So you understand how I work now I see. Sike. Dude I was drunk and was bored and drama happened and I went with it. I don't come on here to have intelligent conversations about science. Why would I? That would be highly unintelligent as there are forums made for that with members who are geared exactly for those conversations. I don't start attacks but if I'm attacked, as I was, I have no problem doing it back, especially on this forum where many troll
It would be difficult to believe you are quite that dunce, so you being drunk does make more sense.I will look over his links but I'm 99% sure they are all still theory as it would be a breakthrough if we knew more about gravity... The integrity of our physics would be compromised, let alone e=mc^2...
Again with the "i'm better than you" rhetoric. You seem to be the only one of us who cares about who's dick is bigger. Perhaps your motivation to announce your qualifications is because your self education is not self evident.I bet I spend more time self educating per day than you. At this moment I am only taking a small break from a circuit forum to respond to you...
If my post made absolutely no sense, then how could you even tell what I was saying? You seemed to have grasped the meaning of my characterizations just fine, but lack the aptitude to defend against it with anything other than 'nu uh', and so you pretend I am beneath you.Again, to reiterate, your previous post to me made absolutely no sense as your claims are invalid. How's that for articulation
The basis for my statements are contained within the thread for all to see. They may indeed be wrong, but we wouldn't know that based on how you conduct yourself here. I would hope your behavior is your asinine attempt to satisfy an alcohol fueled need to feel superior rather than a true reflection of you as a person. IOW it would be refreshing to find out that I am wrong, though I suspect you will continue to prove my point rather than exceed it.e; Seeing as how you are still editing...
It's funny cuz no matter how well you try to articulate, when the basis of your statement is false, none of it matters, there is no partial credit.
You keep dropping hints that you find this amusing. Is this to provide cover for the feeling of our descriptions hitting home? The insults are implied by you and your behavior and only pointed out by me, so I have no need to erase anything. Meanwhile it still remains that telling someone that gravity isn't instant is the best possible and most accurate answer to give, and can only be criticized when seen through your eyes which view the world as having the same superior attitude as you. We have all went back and read post #9 yet do not see the arrogance you do, but perhaps we lack the drunken stupor and self absorbed attitude necessary to see it that way.Plus you act like I was the only one making schoolyard insults; comical; especially as you attempt to insult me but then erase it
My goodness you are dense. Read the thread man. I simply said "prove it", generally, not even singling MH out, yet he chose to take it as an attack and throw the first insults. I then went with it, adding to the intensity each time.So it is okay to act like an ass on these forums because you have other places to go?
The irony man.and so you pretend I am beneath you.
As I have made no statements as to my superiority, intellectually or otherwise, it seems it is you who feels I am superior when you read my words. Your insecurities are not something I can control.My goodness you are dense. Read the thread man. I simply said "prove it", generally, not even singling MH out, yet he chose to take it as an attack and throw the first insults. I then went with it, adding to the intensity each time.
At least you have slowed your hypocrisy, attempting to belittle me through insults because I insulted others who also insulted me. The fact that you still choose to not recognize it is evidence enough that you too act nonsensically. The difference is that you are trying to present yourself in a manner which you seem to think is superior.
I've already mentioned that there are times I say shit to troll, sure. I've also already demonstrated that I comprehend that the speed of gravity is separate from c, even if it is c. Moreover, I'm not timid about joining into online verbal bashing. I've never reported another for attacking me, nor do I take anything on this forum personally.
I support what you say sunni, and respect you as a mod to let this go. But if you think polite debate is the norm at this level in science and academics, then you have only been exposed to the most formal of discourse. Things do get heated and arguments ensue, although there is no excuse for insulting someones mom for example. As mods we have two choices on these forums to handle disagreement, conversation or censorship. As long as the rules are followed, ie no personal abuse or childish name calling, I prefer the former, even if it means a lengthy argument.while I can understand issues in politics, science and other areas can be something we can disagree about , we should not argue or have personal attacks on other members, science is amazing and we should therefore treat it as such hold your head up high guys and stop with the bullshit. Discuss and politely debate if you cannot you and whomever cannot debate properly without pulling in the pissing contest will have a wonderful chit chat with me.
I have ALWAYS been a very good mod in letting things go on a little longer, and so far have edited deleted all the name calling still I will verbally tell people where to draw the line in a pissing contest, like i said debating is great , not everyone holds the same views, name calling is not keep it out of your debate because it makes you look stupidI support what you say sunni, and respect you as a mod to let this go. But if you think polite debate is the norm at this level in science and academics, then you have only been exposed to the most formal of discourse. Things do get heated and arguments ensue, although there is no excuse for insulting someones mom for example. As mods we have two choices on these forums to handle disagreement, conversation or censorship. As long as the rules are followed, ie no personal abuse or childish name calling, I prefer the former, even if it means a lengthy argument.
Ultimately I have thick skin and draw the line a little further than you, but this is not my section and what you say goes.
I elaborated on it in later posts.Holy shit the irony! You just told 2 individuals on Post 9 that it wasn't instantaneous without describing the nature of your statement at all; just a "nop3".
I told him to stop telling people who think it is instantaneous that it can't possibly be.
These are straw men. Generally when discussing scientific ideas, it is cumbersome to preface every comment with something like, "As of today, to the best of our knowledge, the scientific consensus is that...." This type of disclaimer is assumed to be present when discussing ANY theory. We don't say, "to the best of our current understanding, germs causes disease", or " the evidence strongly suggests that we evolved from common ancestors with other species." We already know that every scientific theory is merely a model contingent on current level of understanding and may change or be revised as new data becomes available. We don't have to state that each time we make a comment about what is currently accepted knowledge.. I only disagreed with his telling others that it can't be instantaneous and then it blew up.
Are you being serious right now? You made no attempts degrading or belittling me through your posts, which consequently is a statement to your superior intellect? You even used the statement "not to belittle you"... Furthermore, you tried to tell me how my brain works, and that it thinks at a level that rejects intelligence. All you did was make statements about my intellect, which I adequately refuted by pointing out that you are a blatant hypocrite. Seriously, you just spent multiple posts trying to insult me because I insulted others who also made insultsAs I have made no statements as to my superiority, intellectually or otherwise,
I think that if you are willing to occasionally troll people, then you should be willing to occasionally be put in your place. You can't have it both ways.
I took the statement "Nope, not instantaneous" to define that it could not be instantaneous, and not that it could be. Might just be me, but nope and can't be seem pretty synonymous... "Nope not instantaneous" is pretty clearly defined by the English language bro.Never once did I say that instantaneous transmission is impossible or "can't be".
These are straw men. Generally when discussing scientific ideas, it is cumbersome to preface every comment with something like, "As of today, to the best of our knowledge, the scientific consensus is that...." This type of disclaimer is assumed to be present when discussing ANY theory. We don't say, "to the best of our current understanding, germs causes disease", or " the evidence strongly suggests that we evolved from common ancestors with other species."
As for accusing me of beginning with the insults,
I don't think anyone is under the impression that my posts contain nothing insulting. The difference is my posts are not defamation. I have no need to pretend someone is illiterate or call them a buffoon. When your attitude causes you to attack, and your attacks are dependent on your own shortcomings, it is not inappropriate to point them out.Are you being serious right now? You made no attempts degrading or belittling me through your posts, which consequently is a statement to your superior intellect? You even used the statement "not to belittle you"... Furthermore, you tried to tell me how my brain works, and that it thinks at a level that rejects intelligence. All you did was make statements about my intellect, which I adequately refuted by pointing out that you are a blatant hypocrite. Seriously, you just spent multiple posts trying to insult me because I insulted others who also made insults
Try pawn it off all you want, but I actually comprehend your language and it's obvious you were slipping in insults left and right. Just because your word choice is more subtle, doesn't mean you didn't try
At bold:
Thanks for restating what I just said in the prior post. I let anyone say whatever they want to me and I never hate them for it, I never report them for it, and moreover, I never complain about it; the exact opposite of a hypocrite.
I dunno, maybe you have a Jekyll and Hyde thing going on. Makes me wonder just how you define a hypocrite.Seriously... anyone who agrees with mindphuk in this instance just stop replying to my posts... I can't stand to see individuals who lack intelligence, let alone the ability to discern from intelligence and blasphemy...
If you can't respect keeping an open mind versus closing yours as well as attempting to close others, we are not on the same page, and you can screw off
I never even refuted his statement, only that he tried to apply it to everyone
Someone who insults an individual due to them insulting another. Is that not what you did?I don't think anyone is under the impression that my posts contain nothing insulting. The difference is my posts are not defamation. I have no need to pretend someone is illiterate or call them a buffoon. When your attitude causes you to attack, and your attacks are dependent on your own shortcomings, it is not inappropriate to point them out.
I dunno, maybe you have a Jekyll and Hyde thing going on. Makes me wonder just how you define a hypocrite.
Dammit, I had assumed I was the only one who noticed the font could be color coded. I guess that's what I get for making an assumption. I had hoped my use of colors would dazzle you into silence. Guess I underestimated you.e;
I can make pretty colors too
Here's your first mistake. You took my words and inferred your own interpretation rather than asking for clarification.I took the statement "Nope, not instantaneous" to define that it could not be instantaneous, and not that it could be. Might just be me, but nope and can't be seem pretty synonymous... "Nope not instantaneous" is pretty clearly defined by the English language bro.
It's a strawman to attempt to interpret my words more broadly or more narrowly than how it was intended.They are not strawman...
You use belief and opinion very loosely. When discussing a factual question, all beliefs are not equal. A belief supported by evidence AND theory is stronger than one that is a mere guess. Newton was guessing. He even says so in his writings. Einstein reasoned and concluded based on indirect evidence. We also have experimental evidence which I linked to. So I have no problem telling someone no to a speculative belief when compared to reasoned, evidenced theory.And actually, that is EXACTLY how intelligent individuals describe their take on a situation that is highly theoretical... Which is exactly the type of conversation we were having, as I clearly mentioned, due to the fact we know VERY LITTLE about gravity. What you don't do is reply "nope not" to beliefs that contradict yours.
People can ask for clarification if they are confused. Just because something is theoretical, doesn't mean we can't have a level of confidence about it's correctness. As I point out, quantum theory is theoretical but your circuits that work as predicted are strong indicators that the model of quantum mechanics is at least mostly right. We KNOW quantum theory is wrong on some level. It doesn't incorporate gravity so it has a big hole. That doesn't mean it isn't mostly right. Our lack of a complete theory on gravity does not mean we don't know many things about it, including the speed which it propagates. If gravitons are massless, they will move at exactly c.What value did that statement add? None. In fact, it devalued the entire thread imo because individuals who don't know that the topic is theoretical might now become confused.
Your quote was wrong. There is evidence to support one claim over the other. This is why I posted a link to experiments and pointed out that it is bad form to provide a quote without a link. I could not examine your quote's source and find out when it was written, what else they may have said about it, judge the reliability of the source, etc.Go back and read the post where I told you to "prove it". Immediately after saying that, I backed the statement up with a quote that described that there is no evidence to support either claim, but with that being said, the consensus is that Einstein's take is the more probable.
This is why I said you threw the first 'punch.' The post you quoted IMO demonstrated no level of being hurt and I never claimed that anyone attacked me and suggested you not make this personal. I questioned you about why you think that I thought this and then your very next post called me delusional and a liar.Remember on page 2 when I said "prove it", and then I also mentioned that you "took it as an attack". I then said you seem to be butthurt all the time, and BOOM, we were on our way. It's all in this thread dude. Go back and read posts 20s and you can see I didn't come in this thread to attack anyone. I did comment on you, and we butted heads and went from there.
The way I saw it, you were the only one escalating while I was trying to bring it back down to calm discussion. As far as I can see, I never once made a personal attack against you.e;The posts have already been edited by sunni but it is obvious that the situation esculated between both of us, and that neither of us came in trying to fight. IMO you threw the first insult, but I have a feeling you don't feel the same way.
You're spot on with everything from me leaving (which you've said countless times now) to my "community college programming" and my "community college mathematics". On the contrary, your continued suggestion to others to stop posting to me seems a lot like a cry to be part of the group. This is indeed the Science and Tech subforum correct? Shouldnt that give you a little hint about others abilities to choose for themselves if they want to respond or not? Especially when they didn't listen the first time.Just ignore him and he will go away. Or maybe his behaviour is due to his sense of rejection; some people go over the top to give the impression that they don't care they're being rejected when really they do. Like the loser that tries to pick up the decent girl and is turned down, only to call her a bitch and tell her she is ugly anyway.
Indignancy at its best.
I wouldn't go as far as to say you didn't make any personal attacks, but I will agree that I did most of the escalation. I also agree that of everyone I personally attacked, you were the one who retaliated the least.The way I saw it, you were the only one escalating while I was trying to bring it back down to calm discussion. As far as I can see, I never once made a personal attack against you.
Still, I'm willing to discuss whatever you want as long as you don't make things personal. Attack my argument, my statements, my ideas, my beliefs -- attack them vigorously and without mercy -- but not attack me personally as it does nothing to advance discussion and of course there's no way to defend against insults and ads hominem. I will defend my arguments or change my position if someone can show where I made an error or present a better argument. I still think I said nothing wrong within context of a thought problem that can be answered based on our current model of physics.
I do recall attacking your posts, but I don't remember making any remarks about you personally. I honestly try to avoid the ad hom because it does nothing to promote discussion. I hope this can be a fresh start for all of us.I wouldn't go as far as to say you didn't make any personal attacks, but I will agree that I did most of the escalation. I also agree that of everyone I personally attacked, you were the one who retaliated the least.
Then stop posting towards me and use the ignore function which is there for a reason. It is as simple as that lolpersonally I am done with the self admitted drunk and his ineptness
What if I do? loloh my gawdddddddd you guys. get back on topic...stop arguing fb360 you do NOT need to have the last word.