Man-made global warming is a lie and not backed up by science, claims leading meteorologist.

[Red1966]

See the little dips in the red line? Those are "hiatus'", too. If you and I were having this conversation in 1960, you'd be saying the exact same stupid shit to me that you are now. Then look what happened! From 1970-2010 the red line goes up. Now here we are on the beginning of another one of those small dips in the overall graph, and you think that disproves ACC.

Again, you are a fucking moron who can't read a graph correctly and is too invested in his idiotic position to ever admit he's wrong

Dat ego, tho!

" too invested in his idiotic position to ever admit he's wrong"....lol

 

[Padawanbater2]

" too invested in his idiotic position to ever admit he's wrong"....lol

That's how science works, see, if something were to come along and change the scientific consensus, I'd change my opinion along with it, because I realize I'm not smarter than the collective of tens of thousands of people with advanced scientific degrees who study the shit day in day out

 

[Dr Kynes]

Yeah, nice try dipshit

"Since 2001, 34 national science academies, three regional academies, and both the international InterAcademy Council and International Council of Academies of Engineering and Technological Sciences have made formal declarations confirming human induced global warming and urging nations to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases. The 34 national science academy statements include 33 who have signed joint science academy statements and one individual declaration by the Polish Academy of Sciences in 2007."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change#Statements_by_scientific_organizations_of_national_or_international_standing


Guess how many have denied it?

LOL! Seriously, please guess!

and how many have NOT endorsed this untestable unproveable theory?

lol seriously, you think No Opinion on an issue like this is a Yes Vote?
do try to be less facile.

science academies and scientists rarely come out and declare something is bullshit.

they only do so when they can prove it's bullshit, but the AGW/ACC/Whatever Acronym is Fashionable This Week bullshit is so vague and untestable it's almost impossible to prove, and entirely impossible to disprove.

you are engaging in the Appeal To Authority, God of the Gaps, and No True Scotsman fallacies all at once.

 

[Padawanbater2]

and how many have NOT endorsed this untestable unproveable theory?

How many have said it's a hoax? How many have even disagreed with the consensus?

lol seriously, you think No Opinion on an issue like this is a Yes Vote?
do try to be less facile.

You think 'no stance' means no

I think 'no stance' means... no stance

they only do so when they can prove it's bullshit, but the AGW/ACC/Whatever Acronym is Fashionable This Week bullshit is so vague and untestable it's almost impossible to prove, and entirely impossible to disprove.

lmfao

Prove that's what they think or shut your lying cockholster

you are engaging in the Appeal To Authority, God of the Gaps, and No True Scotsman fallacies all at once.

All credible scientists accept the theory of gravity, I accept it too, I guess I'm appealing to authority there, too, huh, retard?

 

[Dr Kynes]

How many have said it's a hoax? How many have even disagreed with the consensus?



You think 'no stance' means no

I think 'no stance' means... no stance



lmfao

Prove that's what they think or shut your lying cockholster



All credible scientists accept the theory of gravity, I accept it too, I guess I'm appealing to authority there, too, huh, retard?

the "theory of gravity" is not a nebulous series of claims based on secret data, arcane mathematical assumptions, flawed computer models and assholes who jink with the numbers and alter data to make their claims seem plausible, while backpedaling furiously.

you are now engaging in reductio ad retardum.

 

[Padawanbater2]

the "theory of gravity" is not a nebulous series of claims based on secret data, arcane mathematical assumptions, flawed computer models and assholes who jink with the numbers and alter data to make their claims seem plausible, while backpedaling furiously.

you are now engaging in reductio ad retardum.

There is nothing secret about ACC

The computer models aren't flawed

The individuals involved in 'climategate' were exonerated by 8 individual independent investigations into wrongdoing

& you can't stand any of it

Try again

 

[Dr Kynes]

There is nothing secret about ACC

The computer models aren't flawed

The individuals involved in 'climategate' were exonerated by 8 individual independent investigations into wrongdoing

& you can't stand any of it

Try again

ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha !!

somebody doesnt read reports or understand the material.

hint: it's YOU!

secret data is key to AGW/ACC/New Bullshit Acronym Every Time The Models Fail

the models are 100% non-predictive, dont account for dozens of major weather/climate factors, and have consistently failed to produce useful results.

Climategate scammers were "exonerated" by a coverup.
one of em was "exonerated" by a panel from U Penn, who also "Exonerated" joe paterno, shortly before he was convicted of kiddy diddling.

Climategate 2, Scientific Fraud Boogaloo is still being fought in the courts as the participants claim "trade secrets" and "commercial interests" to prevent the DA from seeing their bullshit data.

numerous well respected climatologists have stated emphatically that AGW/ACC/New Bullshit Acronym Every Time The Models Fail is a politically motivated scheme, and scientifically invalid.

the key players in AGW/ACC/New Bullshit Acronym Every Time The Models Fail hucksterism have indicted their agenda from their own mouths (as previously stated in detail in previous threads on this subject) and fools like you think wikipedia is the Source Authority on the IPCC's backpedalling claims.

 

[heckler73]

It was first proven by empirical research in 1861 by John Tyndal that CO2 is in fact a green house gas. Since then, there have been many peer reviewed studies which empirically establish CO2 as a green house gas. Herzberg 1953, Burch 1962, Burch 1970, Harries 2001, Griggs 2004, Chen 2007, Philipona 2004, Evans 2006, Huber and Knutti 2011, Meehl et al 2004.

Which one of those have you read?

The computer models aren't flawed

This is what the Energy Budget looks like according to Salby:



This is what it looks like to you:

cultSCIENCE!!!!!111!@

 

[Padawanbater2]

secret data is key to AGW/ACC/New Bullshit Acronym Every Time The Models Fail

That's why every single thing about it is transparent, huh...

the models are 100% non-predictive, dont account for dozens of major weather/climate factors, and have consistently failed to produce useful results.

Must be why the worlds majority of climate experts accept ACC...

Climategate scammers were "exonerated" by a coverup.

CONSPIRACZY!!!! COVERUP!@@@@ 9/11!!!!!!

Climategate 2, Scientific Fraud Boogaloo is still being fought in the courts as the participants claim "trade secrets" and "commercial interests" to prevent the DA from seeing their bullshit data.

HOAXORZ!!!!!

numerous well respected climatologists have stated emphatically that AGW/ACC/New Bullshit Acronym Every Time The Models Fail is a politically motivated scheme, and scientifically invalid.

FYI, nobody who says that is "well respected" in the scientific community

the key players in AGW/ACC/New Bullshit Acronym Every Time The Models Fail hucksterism have indicted their agenda from their own mouths (as previously stated in detail in previous threads on this subject) and fools like you think wikipedia is the Source Authority on the IPCC's backpedalling claims.

HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAXES!!!!!

 

[abandonconflict]

Which one of those have you read?

the one that says CO2 is a greenhouse gas

 

[Canna Sylvan]

the "theory of gravity" is not a nebulous series of claims based on secret data, arcane mathematical assumptions, flawed computer models and assholes who jink with the numbers and alter data to make their claims seem plausible, while backpedaling furiously.

you are now engaging in reductio ad retardum.

If ACC is real, why did ACC "scientists" put temperature measuring devices at the site of an airport?

 

[Padawanbater2]

If ACC is real, why did ACC "scientists" put temperature measuring devices at the site of an airport?

Just to confuse you and the rest of the Tea Party retards

 

[Canna Sylvan]

Just to confuse you and the rest of the Tea Party retards

Here all this time I thought it was slight of hand trickery so dum dum liberals can have talking points and conservatives can say say, "nuh uh, god did bitches." And conclude with a sing along from Veggie Tales.

 

[Padawanbater2]

Here all this time I thought it was slight of hand trickery so dum dum liberals can have talking points and conservatives can say say, "nuh uh, god did bitches." And conclude with a sing along from Veggie Tales.

Nope, it was to confuse Tea Party retards all along. Also to harness HAARP and stifle chemtrails and convince the public 9/11 was an inside job while simultaneously propping up Al Gore as the ACC hero of the universe and save the polar bears and panda bears from extinction because we think they're so cute!

 

[Canna Sylvan]

Nope, it was to confuse Tea Party retards all along. Also to harness HAARP and stifle chemtrails and convince the public 9/11 was an inside job while simultaneously propping up Al Gore as the ACC hero of the universe and save the polar bears and panda bears from extinction because we think they're so cute!

What you smoking right now? Mine is nowhere near as good.

 

[UncleBuck]

I believe everything the jared taylor and victor thorn tells me. lolololololol

ever so mildly retouched.

 

[Canna Sylvan]

ever so mildly retouched.

Because his original quote stole your position.

 

[UncleBuck]

co2 emissions continue to rise, yet temperatures don't.

WUT?

 

[UncleBuck]

It got me a job working in a university/DOE research facility making more in a couple days than you do in a month. So, yeah, it got me pretty far. At least a lot farther than you.

On a side note, rollitup is logging our IP addresses with an application called "CloudFlare"

guess he's getting tired of all the sock puppets you employ to make it look like others share your delusions and agree with your lies.

 

[UncleBuck]

that is NOT how science works, thats how UNINFORMED OPINION works.

when Dr Oz tells the world "this ne diet pill is a miracle" idiots like you jump on the webs and order it by the truckload, then when Dr Oz is revealed to be a huckster (how shocking) dipshits like you claim "conspiracy by big pharma" and "THEY dont want you to know!" with a side of "The Koch Brothers!!" just for swank.

so you're saying NASA is just being a "huckster" here?

you're positing that this is all some sort of a hoax?

what if phillipe rushton endorsed the theory, would you believe it then?