Man-made global warming is a lie and not backed up by science, claims leading meteorologist.

abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
heckler73 said:
failing to prove the CO2 from humans is causing the temperature to increase.
Click to expand...
It was first proven by empirical research in 1861 by John Tyndal that CO2 is in fact a green house gas. Since then, there have been many peer reviewed studies which empirically establish CO2 as a green house gas. Herzberg 1953, Burch 1962, Burch 1970, Harries 2001, Griggs 2004, Chen 2007, Philipona 2004, Evans 2006, Huber and Knutti 2011, Meehl et al 2004.
 
jahbrudda

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
It was first proven by empirical research in 1861 by John Tyndal that CO2 is in fact a green house gas. Since then, there have been many peer reviewed studies which empirically establish CO2 as a green house gas. Herzberg 1953, Burch 1962, Burch 1970, Harries 2001, Griggs 2004, Chen 2007, Philipona 2004, Evans 2006, Huber and Knutti 2011, Meehl et al 2004.
Click to expand...
You sure love the word empirical.

The problem is, co2 levels have risen in the last 17 years but the earths temperature haven't.
kind of punches a hole in the global alarmists agenda.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
jahbrudda said:
You sure love the word empirical.

The problem is, co2 levels have risen in the last 17 years but the earths temperature haven't.
kind of punches a hole in the global alarmists agenda.
Click to expand...
Average surface temps haven't risen much, but the ocean has alarmingly.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
does beenthere realize that by citing NASA, he is accepting their finding that global warming is caused by human activities?

or is he too stupid to realize the implications of his own posts?
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
jahbrudda said:
0.59 degrees C is alarming? LOL
Click to expand...
Nothing is alarming to a dingbat who doesn't understand how to read temperatures

But I think I'll take NASA's word for it, you know, that organization that supports the IPPC's position on ACC that you keep trying to cite to discredit it?

LOL!
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
So that pie chart described the spending of half a billion dollars in the effort to debunk scientific research.

Am I the only one who thinks that's idiotic and wasteful?

Moving on; no less acknowledged a climate scientist than Professor Bill Gray of the CSU Atmospheric Science department has also gone on record against the evidence of climate change.

He apparently believes were in the midst of natural cyclical change of a type we may not fully understand as yet. As evidence, he cites data of varying output from the Sun due to sunspots and other climate records shorthand variability in the system could account for present observations.

I respectfully disagree, based on one simple fact; there is no long term historical record of this kind of fossil fuel use and CO² production, as it's never happened on this scale for this long before.

That global temperatures and CO² related chemistry are indeed changing in deeply worrying ways can't be a coincidence- hastening as it does with modern industrial activity.

In short, half a billion dollars has been spent NOT to ask this important question; if we are having an impact, HOW MUCH? How could our activity NOT be affecting the planet?
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
34 national science academies

Not a single US government official in any of them

You're almost too stupid for words
Click to expand...
34 national science academies!!1!!one!!uno!!11!!

must be truth if 34 national science academies out of 200+ agree.

thats only ~ 17% "consensus" and thus fails to meet the standard
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes said:
34 national science academies!!1!!one!!uno!!11!!

must be truth if 34 national science academies out of 200+ agree.

thats only ~ 17% "consensus" and thus fails to meet the standard
Click to expand...
Yeah, nice try dipshit

"Since 2001, 34 national science academies, three regional academies, and both the international InterAcademy Council and International Council of Academies of Engineering and Technological Sciences have made formal declarations confirming human induced global warming and urging nations to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases. The 34 national science academy statements include 33 who have signed joint science academy statements and one individual declaration by the Polish Academy of Sciences in 2007."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change#Statements_by_scientific_organizations_of_national_or_international_standing


Guess how many have denied it?

LOL! Seriously, please guess!
 
jahbrudda

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
So that pie chart described the spending of half a billion dollars in the effort to debunk scientific research.

Am I the only one who thinks that's idiotic and wasteful?
Click to expand...
No you are not alone, there are plenty of people that swallow the agw political crap, hook line and sinker.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top