PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
And they still have tattoos of they're hearitage....look closer...learn
The word is *their, not they're. Yes I understand their tattoos. That still doesn't make "Samoan" a religion. Figure out what the ancient samoan religion was called and if it's still religiously practiced or not, and then we'll be back on the page of protected status against unlawful discrimination.
 

tyler.durden

Well-Known Member
I'm not even mad anymore, I'm genuinely curious. How do you keep getting accounts? Do they just not care or are you an insider that they just keep around to rile everybody up every now and again?

Just answer okay all right?
Lol! S'up, dude? Good to see you around, what's been up lately??? I've never suspected Budman of being a mainy sock, that would be brilliant if it is true. I have nothing against him, but I don't get most of his posts. He consistantly seems to be having a different conversation than everyone else, and it confuses me. I never saw anyone else bring it up before, but it is comforting to see I'm not the only one that he confuses...
 

ChingOwn

Well-Known Member
Lol! S'up, dude? Good to see you around, what's been up lately??? I've never suspected Budman of being a mainy sock, that would be brilliant if it is true. I have nothing against him, but I don't get most of his posts. He consistantly seems to be having a different conversation than everyone else, and it confuses me. I never saw anyone else bring it up before, but it is comforting to see I'm not the only one that he confuses...
Sup, homie...He called me mate and uses the emoji but, you know best.
Nothing much has been up, have been on internet hiatus. I mean a lot went down for me in the past few years but a little too personal for a forum post. I don't drink as much, and have been spending less and less time in the civilized parts of the world the last two years.

How bout you, did you participate in the rioting?
 

tyler.durden

Well-Known Member
Sup, homie...He called me mate and uses the emoji but, you know best.
Nothing much has been up, have been on internet hiatus. I mean a lot went down for me in the past few years but a little too personal for a forum post. I don't drink as much, and have been spending less and less time in the civilized parts of the world the last two years.

How bout you, did you participate in the rioting?
Sounds heavy, bro. Taking a break from the web and less drinking sounds positive, I hope it has been. All is going well for me at the moment with the businesses, and I caught the Rona twice but I'm over it now. As for the rioting, I set a fed building on fire and shot a few cops, nothing major ;) Standard Project Mayhem shit. Hope you stick around for a while...
 

BudmanTX

Well-Known Member
The word is *their, not they're. Yes I understand their tattoos. That still doesn't make "Samoan" a religion. Figure out what the ancient samoan religion was called and if it's still religiously practiced or not, and then we'll be back on the page of protected status against unlawful discrimination.
found this paper quite interesting today....

 

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
That article says basically exactly what I told you yesterday, so thanks for confirming.

Here's a quote from the article you posted:

"The Legal Issues with Inflexible Tattoos Policies

People who voluntarily receive body art are not a protected class covered by Title VII. This doesn’t mean, however, that employers can ban all visible tattoos without making room for legally necessary exceptions.

Title VII does protect employees based on their sincerely held religious beliefs, for example. So, if the employee you hired in the winter suddenly reveals a tattoo when their wardrobe changes to short-sleeved shirts, remember to proceed with caution."
 

BudmanTX

Well-Known Member
That article says basically exactly what I told you yesterday, so thanks for confirming.

Here's a quote from the article you posted:

"The Legal Issues with Inflexible Tattoos Policies
People who voluntarily receive body art are not a protected class covered by Title VII. This doesn’t mean, however, that employers can ban all visible tattoos without making room for legally necessary exceptions.

Title VII does protect employees based on their sincerely held religious beliefs, for example. So, if the employee you hired in the winter suddenly reveals a tattoo when their wardrobe changes to short-sleeved shirts, remember to proceed with caution."
ah no problem....last night when I got off here.....I kinda said to myself "what did I do" kinda thing. So this morning when I woke to come to work here in Texas, I decided to re-read and also do a little research on the idea of tattoos in the work place. Which from my surprises has become somewhat of an issue in some instances. So I wanted to put that up and basically apologize for being kinda of a prick...so to speak....

the samoa article which I put up earlier was a surprise when found it, js.....

this afternoon I came across another from the Richmond school of law.....

here


I'm still reading it, so bare with me...ok
 

The Gram Reaper

Well-Known Member
I'm a pretty open minded person. But I just don't think this guy is the number one draft choice for teaching 5 year olds in their first exposure to public schools.

I want them to learn how to spell c-a-t and d-o-g. Not scream like they're in a horror movie.

He sure doesn't remind me of Mrs. Logero who I had a thing for at age 5.

If someone would have a 'thing' for this dude, how would they turn out at age 18 or 21?

Am I just too up tight?

View attachment 4698354


I just don't know about this one.

Opinions?
Discrimination based on the color of his skin, for sure.
 

curious2garden

Well-Known Mod
Staff member
Here's a pic of a teacher (Mrs. Brendel) I had in grade school.
She would sing to the class only on Friday's 1/2 hour before school was let out.

View attachment 4700000
Scroll down...
 
Top