Would you have a problem with this kindergarten teacher?

PJ Diaz said:

Maybe so, but it's not legally protected under the law. Only specific forms of discrimination are illegal.

Click to expand...

DrKiz said:

So guys we have a real bright one here don't we.

I'm sure the rest of you could see what I was getting at, unfortunately the Troll @BudmanTX isn't here in good faith it seems, but that's ok.

Nothing better than a bumbling idiot to make a fool of.

While @BudmanTX was picking boogers out of his nose in high school, the rest of us were learning that LAWFUL DISCRIMINATION applies to things we are born with or cannot change.

It appears @BudmanTX has made poor life choices, probably an incel typing from his parents basement, and wants the rest of society to prop him up.

Sorry bucko, argue all you want. That's not the way the world works. And you know what, I FUCKING LOVE IT! IM SMILING THAT IT IS THAT WAY.

Otherwise, we'd have a world of idiots like you running around shitting up everyplace you enter. Just like here.

They could have fired that tattoo covered degenerate, and he couldn't have done shit... except for cry to little panty wastes like you for sympathy points.

I would like to have just one day where they take the warning labels off of everything, it would correct the defects wandering around such as yourself.

Did I explain it patiently enough for you.

When you finally get a job and learn how to hold a spoon properly, maybe we will be able to take you seriously.

Until then, rub the snot from your nose and go outside and play. The adults are trying to talk.

I'm just going to observe. He's doing a service to me from this point out. Never interupt an enemy when he's making a mistake.

Click to expand...

PJ Diaz said:

None of them have to do with tattoos.

That said, if he happened to follow a recognized religion, which included body tattoos, then he might have a case; similar to the way Sikhs are protected with their overgrown beards, because it's part of their religion.

Click to expand...

BudmanTX said:

So having tattoos isn't a form of discrimination, especially on hands, face and eyes? Hmm

Click to expand...

BudmanTX said:

This is about a person with tattoos and is a teacher, nothing more. And if he does follow a recognized religion so what. It come down to appearance against the so called norm of humanity.

Click to expand...

BudmanTX said:

Yeah an account from 2019, I'm gonna believe you...

Enemy? Who?

Click to expand...

BudmanTX said:

Yeah an account from 2019, I'm gonna believe you...

Enemy? Who?

Click to expand...

PJ Diaz said:

It is a form of discrimination, as others have already said. However it's not an illegal form of discrimination, which is the key point here. I'm not saying that I don't think it should be protected, but at the end of the day you have to think like a lawyer, and a lawyer will tell you that you haven't been illegally discriminated against.

Click to expand...

BudmanTX said:

This is about a person with tattoos and is a teacher, nothing more. And if he does follow a recognized religion so what. It come down to appearance against the so called norm of humanity.

Click to expand...

tangerinegreen555 said:

I'm a pretty open minded person. But I just don't think this guy is the number one draft choice for teaching 5 year olds in their first exposure to public schools.

I want them to learn how to spell c-a-t and d-o-g. Not scream like they're in a horror movie.

He sure doesn't remind me of Mrs. Logero who I had a thing for at age 5.

If someone would have a 'thing' for this dude, how would they turn out at age 18 or 21?

Am I just too up tight?

View attachment 4698354

A man covered his face with tattoos and turned his eyes black. He says it cost him his kindergarten teaching job | CNN

A schoolteacher whose body, face and tongue are covered in tattoos and who has had the whites of his eyes surgically turned black said he was prevented from teaching at a French kindergarten after a parent complained he scared their child.

www.cnn.com

I just don't know about this one.

Opinions?

Click to expand...

PJ Diaz said:

Maybe you'll believe the EEOC then? They basically say exactly the same thing @DrKiz already explained to you: https://www.eeoc.gov/discrimination-type

Click to expand...

BudmanTX said:

So it's a form, but not to the norm of what u think is discrimination, got it...and in the list...hmm

Click to expand...

BudmanTX said:

Honestly I don't care, at this point. Started 2019, unless a mod tells me otherwise..we go from there...

Click to expand...

PJ Diaz said:

Here is a specific example (from the EEOC website) which supports my assertion of religious tattoos being protected against discrimination under the law:

View attachment 4699320

Click to expand...

PJ Diaz said:

It has nothing to do with what I may or may not think what discrimination is. The point is that it's not protected under the law. I don't like the law in that regard myself, but I do understand how it's written. If you want to have a debate, you should steep your debate in facts, not feelings. So far you have presented zero facts, only your personal feelings.

Click to expand...

BudmanTX said:

It' not religious unless it's Samoan, then different ball game. Let the person in question explain...this is him

Click to expand...

BudmanTX said:

It does cause your changing your skin...

Click to expand...

PJ Diaz said:

"Samoan" isn't a religion.

Click to expand...