Wondering about this light on amazon...

CobKits said:

ledgardener.com

Click to expand...

thank you friend

nfhiggs said:

For whatever reason, the first time I looked at the link, it pulled up the specs for the 2300W version, that states 2200 uMol/m2/s at a canopy height of 24". Thats the info I based my original comment on. That's photo inhibition levels...

Click to expand...

I was about to talk mad shit on the post two above this. then I saw this post. Makes sense now.

I was like "why tf would you keep that kinda distance with a 130 watt light?"

Johnny Lawrence said:

I was about to talk mad shit on the post two above this. then I saw this post. Makes sense now.

I was like "why tf would you keep that kinda distance with a 130 watt light?"

Click to expand...

Yeah, when I went back and looked at the link again tonight I was like "what the hell was I reading when I posted that?" Then I saw the specs for the higher wattage versions and realized that's what I was looking at originally.

Looks like a decent first led for the price to flower one small plant.
When you use a good led though you'll do much better.

hybridway2 said:

Looks like a decent first led for the price to flower one small plant.

Click to expand...

Not even. You need to see through all their deception. Fraudulent liars. It's an over priced piece of shit.
It's vendors like this that prop up the HPS market. When someone using HPS tries LED and believes the bullshit. Like this 200 wall watt fixture is the equivalent to an 1000W HPS. The buyer then finds out the "1000W equivalent" did not perform as well as the HPS. That buyer spreads their anecdotal evidence supporting HPS being superior to LED.

People think an LED is a low powered light bulb. An LED is nothing like a light bulb. LEDs are very complicated. Light bulbs are simple.