Will this man end dem super majority?

Big P

Well-Known Member
must see clip

[youtube]OJEEQHOnI2Q[/youtube]

capt.7d5b2d6c799f416b8ae348ddc901c11f.kennedy_successor_debates_masr103.jpg


WILL THIS MAN END DEM SUPER MAJORITY?

THE BIG FIGHT: Mass. Senate race becoming proxy on health bill, big gov't...

VIDEO: 'IT'S NOT KENNEDY'S SEAT, IT'S THE PEOPLE'S SEAT'...


 
He will do alright, but I don't think he's gonna win. Massholes love themselves some big government...

His opponent, Martha Coakley, stood against the ballot question to decriminalize possession of less than an ounce while she was AG. If anyone is in MA, you might want to call their respective campaigns and ask how the candidates would vote on abolishing federal marijuana prohibition. I'd be curious to hear what they have to say on the matter.:leaf:
 
I hope scott brown chokes on a dick. If it had been a democrat that was in that magazine we couldn't get stupid ass republicans to shut up.
 
This is the most momentous "special election" in recent history.
What an unexpected turn of events.
It is almost a year to the day that the hopey-changey crew took over.
Who would have thought in this short period of time, that the repudiation thereof would be even a remote possibility!
Time to make the popcorn and the cocktail weenies...tonight is gonna be a rip-snorting good time.
What tremendous entertainment!
 
But if he wins, you won't hope that he fails, right?



we will hope he fails if his policy's are bad, ofcoarse. We will hope he fails if he pulls a bait and switch like obama has done, ofcoarse


if you hire a guy at your shop thinking he is a good man and then you find out hes is not

wouldnt you hope he failed at being shitty too:bigjoint:
 
This is the most momentous "special election" in recent history.
What an unexpected turn of events.
It is almost a year to the day that the hopey-changey crew took over.
Who would have thought in this short period of time, that the repudiation thereof would be even a remote possibility!
Time to make the popcorn and the cocktail weenies...tonight is gonna be a rip-snorting good time.
What tremendous entertainment!



yes sir, im buying cigars tonight:bigjoint:
 
image;size=239x110


STOCKS JUMP ON MASS. RACE FALLOUT?


Massachusetts Votes in Crucial Election for Obama


Published: Tuesday, 19 Jan 2010 | 9:54 AM ET

By: Reuters

Massachusetts voters headed to the polls Tuesday in a cliffhanger election for a new U.S. senator that could derail Democrats' dominance in Washington and scuttle their top priority of sweeping healthcare reform.
capitol_building_flag_200.jpg


What looked likely to be a Democratic shoo-in to replace late party icon Edward Kennedy has turned into a too-close-to-call race with a last-minute rally by a Republican, state Senator Scott Brown.

Latest opinion polls suggest he could defeat state Attorney General Martha Coakley, which would be a huge upset in this traditionally liberal New England state, and take away the Democrats' supermajority in Congress.

Voting started at 7 a.m. EST and polls will stay open until 8 p.m. EST. Results could take a few hours to emerge after polls close.
Turnout could be a major factor in the unusual, off-season election. Given intense interest, turnout could approach that of a regular state election, Secretary of State William Galvin said on Sunday.

High turnout could benefit the more energized Brown campaign, although registered Democrats in Massachusetts hold a sizable numerical advantage.

Tuesday dawned in the Boston area with intermittent snow showers and freezing drizzle. Snow and rain are expected across the state, which could keep some voters at home.

Kennedy, who held the seat for almost 47 years, died in August of brain cancer. Democrat Paul Kirk was appointed by the state's governor in September to occupy Kennedy's seat and will remain in the Senate until a winner is sworn in.
Massachusetts last elected a Republican to the Senate in 1972, but the weak economy and doubts about the healthcare overhaul have moved voters to reconsider political loyalties passed down through generations.
Their possible change of heart could not have come at a more crucial juncture for Obama.
Democrats now control 60 votes in the Senate to 40 for the Republicans. The loss of one seat could hamper the Democrats' ability to cut off debate and proceed to a vote on the planned healthcare overhaul.

More broadly, an upset in Massachusetts, or even a narrow win for Coakley, would raise the specter of large losses for Democrats in midterm congressional elections in November.

'Anger and Frustration'

The Republican has attracted strong support from independent voters, including many who backed Obama in 2008.
"There's an anger, a frustration that's being felt in Massachusetts," said James Gomes, director of the Mosakowski Institute for Public Enterprise at Clark University in Massachusetts.

D-Day for Obama

A series of polls over the past week has shown Brown edging ahead, although mostly within the margin of error for each survey. The nonpartisan Cook Political Report judges the race a toss-up.
Millions of dollars have flooded into the state of 6.5 million people to buy all-day television advertising for both sides, transforming a relatively sleepy contest into a bitter brawl.

Coakley has been criticized for a lackluster campaign. She took almost a week off from the campaign trail around Christmas, at a time when Brown's appeal was on the rise.

Democrats in Massachusetts have a large advantage in registered voters and an elaborate get-out-the-vote apparatus.
But Republicans appear to be motivated in the final stretch, and the Brown campaign has attracted a large influx of volunteers to staff telephone banks and knock on doors of prospective voters.

"I would expect that the Democrats would have an advantage in terms of the shoe leather on the pavement. But it sure looks like the intensity is on the Republican side right now," Gomes said.
 
Tight Massachusetts race alarms California Dems



Carla Marinucci,Joe Garofoli, Chronicle Political Writers
Tuesday, January 19, 2010



The possible loss of a U.S. Senate seat in Massachusetts has Democrats on edge 3,000 miles away in California, where party activists fear a GOP upset today could trigger a conservative wave and swamp health care reform and the 2010 midterm elections.



"Regardless of the outcome ... this should be a gigantic wake-up call to the Democratic Party - that we're not connecting with the needs, the aspirations and the desires of real people right now," said San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom.
With Republican Scott Brown poised to defeat Democrat Martha Coakley in the Massachusetts race to succeed the late Edward Kennedy, Democrats at the annual Martin Luther King community breakfast in San Francisco were buzzing about the impacts of such an upset: an end to the party's 60-vote supermajority and a possible mortal blow to the health care legislation championed by President Obama.



Ripple effects


But Democrats also considered the ripple effects on coming elections in the nation's most populous state.
"We better get our act together - and quickly," Newsom said. Voters "are so angry. They don't feel that we're paying attention to their needs, in terms of their jobs, and what's going on at the grassroots, in their neighborhoods."
With just 10 months until the 2010 midterm election, the mayor's remarks underscore how the Brown-Coakley race has set off alarms in Democratic-leaning California, which is holding two high-profile elections this cycle.
Sen. Barbara Boxer, a three-term Democrat, faces a re-election challenge - with three Republicans vying to defeat her: former Rep. Tom Campbell, former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina and Assemblyman Chuck DeVore of Irvine.
Boxer polled no more than 46 percent of the vote against any of the three in a Rasmussen Poll released Friday.
And with GOP Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger termed out, former two-term Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown will face one of two wealthy GOP challengers: former eBay CEO Meg Whitman or state Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner.
Worse than a canary


For Boxer, a favorite Republican target, a GOP win in Massachusetts would be a particularly dark sign representing "not just the canary in the coal mine," said Wade Randlett, a leading Silicon Valley fundraiser for Obama. "It's the flock of dead ravens landing on the lawn."
But Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, speaking to reporters Monday, expressed confidence in Boxer - and in Democrats' prospects in California. She insisted that - whatever the outcome - the results today will in no way represent a repudiation of the Obama administration, especially on the matter of health care reform.
"Certainly the dynamics will change depending on what happens in Massachusetts," she said. "But it doesn't mean we won't have a health care bill."
Still, "if Brown wins, then Tea Party supporters will smell blood in California," said Joe Wierzbicki, coordinator of the Tea Party Express, a conservative organization that counts roughly a quarter of its 353,000 supporters in California.
"This would be a sign that the momentum in general is in the direction of the Tea Party movement," he said.


Key differences


There are, however, key differences in party demographics in the two states. While Massachusetts Democrats hold a 3-to-1 registration lead over Republicans, more than half of that state's voters are registered independent.
In California, 45 percent of registered voters are Democrats, 31 percent Republicans, and 20 percent decline to state.
Boxer, unlike Coakley, has run three Senate races - and her office said Monday that she had raised more money than ever in the fundraising period that ended in December. (The figures are to be released today.)
"What happens in Massachusetts in January doesn't predict what is going to happen in California in November," said Boxer campaign manager Rose Kapolczynski. "We're taking nothing for granted."
But "if Brown manages to win, I certainly think that will encourage the supporters" of DeVore, the more conservative GOP Senate candidate, Kapolczynski said. "If the national Tea Party movement engaged ... that could dramatically change the Republican primary."
Going forward, Pelosi said Democrats will continue to pound "Main Street" issues, while Republicans will continue to represent the insurance companies, the wealthy and Wall Street.
American voters will be reminded "the Republicans in Congress ... weren't for Social Security, they weren't for Medicare," she said.
But Newsom said the Republican resurgence in Massachusetts suggests "there's real intensity and fervor out there, as represented by the Tea Party" activists expressing anger at government spending and at job losses.
"This is real," he said. "At our own peril, we dismiss these tea parties as ... some sort of isolated extremism. ... It's not."
State of Union


The White House announced that President Obama will deliver his State of the Union address Jan. 27 at 6 p.m. PST.
The speech to the joint session of Congress is customarily carried by all the major broadcast and cable news networks and will be streamed on the White House Web site: www.whitehouse.gov.​
 
My sense is that all this triumphalism on the part of the republicans is going to blow up right in their faces. Seriously, some people are acting like the election is over already which is exactly how martha coakley went from shoe-in to underdog within a month. My advice to my republican friends would be not to count their chickens before they roost or whatever the expression is. You can bet your ass that a lot of voters who thought they wouldn't have to go and vote today are going to be heading to the polls when every republican in the state is acting like it's in the bag for scotty boy...
 
well piss on me and tell me its raining, who coulda ever thought of such an idea!!!!!!:bigjoint:

lol this guy.... this guy!!



Obama's top priority is to boost jobs: White House

WASHINGTON
Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:09pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama's top goal as he enters a second year in office is to lift U.S. job creation and revitalize the economy, the White House said on Tuesday.
Barack Obama

"The top priority is to continue to work hard on getting this economy back on track and creating jobs," White House spokesman Robert Gibbs told a news briefing.

Obama, who completes a year at the White House this week, has suggested a second round of job creation initiatives on top of a $787 billion emergency stimulus he signed in February 2009 to aid the economy and the House of Representatives approved a $15 billion job bill in December.
(Reporting by Alister Bull; Editing by Sandra Maler)

Barack Obama



Comments

Jan 19, 2010

Obama’s top priority is to boost jobs: White House. Just not here, right?


BenDejo

Jan 19, 2010

ROTFLMAO I’m glad this is the top priority; otherwise, unemployment would be higher than 10%…Oh wait it is…nevermind.


AdamonC​

Jan 19, 2010

You’re kidding? Jobs? I thought it was borrowing money we don’t have and ramming a health care bill nobody wants down our throats! And all this time I thought he cared more about his agenda than he did about this country….


AnneP​

Jan 19, 2010

NO STIMULUS II!!! Stimulus I didn’t work! We know how many jobs were lost but not sure how many were ’saved or created’ if any! The only way Obummer knows to fix anything is to throw OUR money at it or grow government! We’re out of money, Obozo. Find another way! Be bi-partisan and ask the Repubs; they may have some ideas. You’re toast and continue to destroy this country!


MaryAnneR​

Jan 19, 2010

Good grief. Higher insurance costs. Higher taxes. More regulations. What first year policy has there been that would entice small business to hire more workers?


hrgottlieb​

Jan 19, 2010

It doesn’t matter what he tries to do to “boost” jobs. His only focus in on buying votes so far and I don’t think it will change. $787billion down the drain to government jobs will not boost jobs in the private sector. He’s the most incompetent president I’ve ever seen.


djx​

Jan 19, 2010

Give me a break. POTUS wastes a year chasing an irrelevant set of legislative objectives while millions of U.S. citizens lose their jobs, wealth and homes and now they think they can fool us with this PR scam? 11/2/10 awaits.


vikings4123​

Jan 19, 2010

Yeah sure if you want a Fed or Union J O B.


Harpotoo​

Jan 19, 2010

That’s funny, I thought his top priority was to take control of 1/6 of the economy, I mean pass the health care takeover, I mean Health Insurance Reform.
Silly me


 
Back
Top