Why don't you like Ron Paul?

lifegoesonbrah

Well-Known Member
The politics section is not as super serial as it may look. UB makes me lawl and has some valid points, even though his political stance is for the fail.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
i more than likely wont, and if you hadnt felt the need to give your two cents worth he wouldn't have gotten any more mention than the initial post. sorry if me hating your friend causes you troubles. that isnt my problem.
It doesn't cause me troubles, what causes me troubles, is when a MODERATOR thinks it is ok to take a technical advantage over someone because they are madbro about having their arguments shown to be complete garbage. Since you are a MODERATOR it is your problem. UB and I disagree plenty, you just can't see it because we also agree plenty, but for all your opinions of him, he shows me respect because I utilize logic and I abase myself when prevailing logic points to my fallacies. You play immature tactics to enjoy a technical upper hand over someone you could not possibly defeat in debate. You should not be a mod.
 

lifegoesonbrah

Well-Known Member
It doesn't cause me troubles, what causes me troubles, is when a MODERATOR thinks it is ok to take a technical advantage over someone because they are madbro about having their arguments shown to be complete garbage. Since you are a MODERATOR it is your problem. UB and I disagree plenty, you just can't see it because we also agree plenty, but for all your opinions of him, he shows me respect because I utilize logic and I abase myself when prevailing logic points to my fallacies. You play immature tactics to enjoy a technical upper hand over someone you could not possibly defeat in debate. You should not be a mod.

I think we should have mod elections in the politics section :eyesmoke:
 

xtcxlocstax

Active Member
*abolishing public education
*opposing civil rights
*opposing the civil war
*unable to comprehend the 14th amendment
*considers jim crow laws, segregation, etc merely "bad things", but not unconstitutional
*racist newsletters for profit and lied about them
*fucks turtles
*would have no problem letting states prohibit cannabis
*would have no problem letting states decide for my wife
*considers my wife's use of the pill to be a problem
*consider sex for non- procreative reasons to be immoral
*fucks turtles
*king of pork, takes a ton of it (after voting against the budget, of course)
*thinks people should not live in areas where disasters could occur, i.e. 99% of the entire nation
*thinks victims of sexual harassment should just go get another job
*fucks turtles
*dupes naive college kids into sending him money bombs when he knows he is a loser
*not brave enough to run as an independent
*runs within the two party system even though he claims he is a revolutionary
*calls homosexuals "not acceptable"
*supports DOMA, which is unconstitutional
*does not support israel
*is against foreign aid, which nets us priceless information for minimal cost
*fucks turtles
*congressional insider trading

that's just what i could think of off the top of my head. i could go on.
minimal cost*??? Since when is 25 billion minimal cost? What priceless information are you referring to? And please don't say to prevent a terrorist attack, Germany spends half that. So why can't the u.s.?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
minimal cost*??? Since when is 25 billion minimal cost? What priceless information are you referring to? And please don't say to prevent a terrorist attack, Germany spends half that. So why can't the u.s.?
sure, we could probably bump it down to half of what we do, but to get rid of it completely like ron paul wants to do is textbook dum-dum. we gain a lot of information about all variety of things. exactly what is beyond me, but i would guess it has to do with foreign resources and other stuff that would be of interest to us and our allies.
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
My complaint about Ron Paul is he fucks the shit out of Jeshua, but claims to be a Libertarian, wtf?

My biggest complaint is his, "the state did it, not my fault," stance. The state is another government. What kind of justice is the state murdering you, but a slap on the wrist if you did it one step in the other direction?

"Haha you're in Alabama bitch!"

"Oh yeah? I'm in Florida now, bitch!"

BANG

"We find the defendant George Zimmerman, not guilty."
 

sync0s

Well-Known Member
My complaint about Ron Paul is he fucks the shit out of Jeshua, but claims to be a Libertarian, wtf?

My biggest complaint is his, "the state did it, not my fault," stance. The state is another government. What kind of justice is the state murdering you, but a slap on the wrist if you did it one step in the other direction?

"Haha you're in Alabama bitch!"

"Oh yeah? I'm in Florida now, bitch!"

BANG

"We find the defendant George Zimmerman, not guilty."
Liberal in denial claims he knows what Libertarian means.
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
Liberal in denial claims he knows what Libertarian means.
I took that "I side on" test. I scored 82% libertarian and only 16% democtatic (liberal). I'm also 63% republican. So hardly liberal at all.

Also, how is being for state's rights, libertarian? Wrong is wrong, doesn't matter where you happen to live. But that is much different than not getting involved with another country. If it's your own country, it's another matter again. What happens if you move and another moves to where you left. Those policies you two worked for shouldn't change. The libertarian philosophy is no one harms you and you don't harm them.

Other issues like abortion are libertarian ambiguous. It depends if you give the unborn rights over their own being, or treat it like a tumor. You can't claim viability. A newborn can go fend for itself, huh. :dunce:
 

sync0s

Well-Known Member
I took that "I side on" test. I scored 82% libertarian and only 16% democtatic (liberal). I'm also 63% republican. So hardly liberal at all.

Also, how is being for state's rights, libertarian? Wrong is wrong, doesn't matter where you happen to live. But that is much different than not getting involved with another country. If it's your own country, it's another matter again. What happens if you move and another moves to where you left. Those policies you two worked for shouldn't change. The libertarian philosophy is no one harms you and you don't harm them.

Other issues like abortion are libertarian ambiguous. It depends if you give the unborn rights over their own being, or treat it like a tumor. You can't claim viability. A newborn can go fend for itself, huh. :dunce:
I have no clue what the fuck you are babbling on about.

My complaint about Ron Paul is he fucks the shit out of Jeshua, but claims to be a Libertarian, wtf?
Have fun using your "scientific" quiz as a mask.

With machines keeping track of everything, people can finally work together but have their individuality.
People alone can't make decisions. Humanity as a whole only can.
I'm really a socialist
lol I mean seriously?

Canna Sylvan said:
Why can't we kill humans? Why is it that killing plants and animals are ok but not humans? Do we deem humans as far more superior than them? Who are we to make such judgments?
Feel free to choose not to kill plants or animals, by the way. See how far your family tree extends.
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
Syncos,

The rub comes in when reality strikes. If I had my way, I'd vote for Skynet. With reality, I have to vote laissez-faire capitalist libertarian.
 

deprave

New Member
My complaint about Ron Paul is he fucks the shit out of Jeshua, but claims to be a Libertarian, wtf?

My biggest complaint is his, "the state did it, not my fault," stance. The state is another government. What kind of justice is the state murdering you, but a slap on the wrist if you did it one step in the other direction?

"Haha you're in Alabama bitch!"

"Oh yeah? I'm in Florida now, bitch!"

BANG

"We find the defendant George Zimmerman, not guilty."
what are you talking about? Ron paul doesn't believe in the death penalty..if thats what your talking about
 
Top