mccumcumber
Well-Known Member
damnit beansly now my post just looks retarded.
Who will beat the Packers?
- Thread starter ......
- Start date
KidneyStoner420
Well-Known Member
I told ya not to run your mouth too soon. Maybe he can get his percect season next year. Nahhhh
growbuddy1
Active Member
It's tough to win a game when you're on your 4th string offensive line, top receivers out, and our best safety out, but they put up a pretty good fight. Not to mention about 10 dropped passes. None-the-less the Packers are still the best team in the league. We'll have our players back by the play offs. No worries 
And at least we're getting some of our back up's in for some quality snaps and experience. Just gives us more depth for the play offs. Honestly, this lose was probably better for the Packers than it was bad. Now they can go to the film room, look at the big mistakes, and adjust. All you haters can hate, but you'll see what happens in the playoffs. If our 4th string o-line can compete with KC first string, I'm happy with our performance.
And at least we're getting some of our back up's in for some quality snaps and experience. Just gives us more depth for the play offs. Honestly, this lose was probably better for the Packers than it was bad. Now they can go to the film room, look at the big mistakes, and adjust. All you haters can hate, but you'll see what happens in the playoffs. If our 4th string o-line can compete with KC first string, I'm happy with our performance.
Beansly
RIU Bulldog
sorry...I can't hear you over all this WINNING!It's tough to win a game when you're on your 4th string offensive line, top receivers out, and our best safety out, but they put up a pretty good fight. Not to mention about 10 dropped passes. None-the-less the Packers are still the best team in the league. We'll have our players back by the play offs. No worries
And at least we're getting some of our back up's in for some quality snaps and experience. Just gives us more depth for the play offs. Honestly, this lose was probably better for the Packers than it was bad. Now they can go to the film room, look at the big mistakes, and adjust. All you haters can hate, but you'll see what happens in the playoffs. If our 4th string o-line can compete with KC first string, I'm happy with our performance.
growbuddy1
Active Member
KidneyStoner420
Well-Known Member
It's tough to win a game when you're on your 4th string offensive line, top receivers out, and our best safety out, but they put up a pretty good fight. Not to mention about 10 dropped passes. None-the-less the Packers are still the best team in the league. We'll have our players back by the play offs. No worries
And at least we're getting some of our back up's in for some quality snaps and experience. Just gives us more depth for the play offs. Honestly, this lose was probably better for the Packers than it was bad. Now they can go to the film room, look at the big mistakes, and adjust. All you haters can hate, but you'll see what happens in the playoffs. If our 4th string o-line can compete with KC first string, I'm happy with our performance.
growbuddy1
Active Member
Haha yeah all that winning, KC isn't even going to make the playoffs. They squeaked by on Packer injuries... congrats?
growbuddy1
Active Member
Anyone that truly knows football, knows I'm 100% right. We'll see it happen in the playoffs!
KidneyStoner420
Well-Known Member
Oh, ok, well now that you cleared that up, Brady and the Pats have had 3 perfect seasons already!
Funny, how you step back now. Just yesterday you were claiming a 19-0 "perfect season"
KidneyStoner420
Well-Known Member
growbuddy1
Active Member
Not true, that's just how you interpreted it. Brady won every regular season game and lost the superbowl, while I was saying a few loses don't matter as long as you win the superbowl. If you actually READ my post you will see that I said I'd rather have them lose a couple games and play back ups keeping their starters fresh and giving more depth to there roster.. here I'll copy / paste so you can try reading it again
*Honestly I don't think the Pack will go for the 19-0 They will sit they're starters, maybe losing one of the last couple games while preparing for the playoffs. Which is fine with me! I'd rather lose a few games and win a superbowl than win every game and lose the superbowl (what poor coaching on part of the patriots) The Packers back ups have more skill than most other teams starters. We might get those games with our backups, who knows what they'll do. Either way Tom Brady's still a bitch
That was a week ago dude... I never said they were going to have an undefeated season, I actually said the complete opposite, and it's going to play out to benefit the Packers.
I'm not saying I'm always right, but every coach knows that once you lock in your playoff spot you should rest your starters. Not to mention top injuries always build depth to the younger guys that don't play often. Just look at this game ALONE, our young line got some awesome experience that might come in handy for the playoffs, if not we'll have our top knotch starters... like I said if you don't understand that then you don't really understand the game of football. That doesn't mean your not a fan, it just means you don't know what goes into coaching and preparing for the playoffs ect. Further more, why would our coach risk a hurting his players further? All the small injuries get treated like big ones at the end of the season, a lot of our starters were good to go today, but why risk it when we already have a playoffs spot?
I'm not trying to be a dick, but it's more than obvious you don't understand these concepts when it comes to football.
?????????????????????I believe they already did that this season by beating them... you better believe they'd whoop on them again. The Saints don't have a complete team like the Packers, nor do they have a Rogers. You can't beat 23/24 or 25/27 pass completion. His worst game this year is like 21/26. That's ridiculous. Rogers is on point to shred Bree's season records from Drew's Super Bowl year. The only reason the Saints even made the super bowl that year is because the Vikings backs had 5 fumbles in the playoffs game, 4 in the first half I believe. Bree's had a 1 decent year, while his defense played dirty as hell, that's it. The Bears are more of a threat to the Packers than the Saints, and that's saying A LOT!
Haha how do the saints have a more rounded offense? Rogers throws a completed pass to 9-10+ different receivers / backs a game. On top of 2 backs that can rush for 100+ yards a game, including a 2nd year back that has already done it in the playoffs as a rookie. Bree's throws to his tight end and maybe 3 receivers, not to mention the Packers line dominates, even when they're best blocker was injured; they're backups came in and have made every team look like butter. At the point you have the depth the Packers do, with the skill and good coaching, with Rogers confident the Packers aren't going to lose man
Honestly, the Saints look like a practice squad / college team in comparison to the Packers.
I think a good super bowl would be Packers vs Ravens.
growbuddy1
Active Member
Where does it say anything about a perfect season? You just further proved MY point. You should work for ESPN with all your football intelligence
Not to mention that entire post is Saints vs Packers, it has nothing to do with a perfect season, or anything close to that. At the point you have the depth the Packers do, with the skill and good coaching, with Rogers confident the Packers aren't going to lose man
Even this statement is in reference to playing the saints in the playoffs..
Not to mention that entire post is Saints vs Packers, it has nothing to do with a perfect season, or anything close to that. At the point you have the depth the Packers do, with the skill and good coaching, with Rogers confident the Packers aren't going to lose man
Even this statement is in reference to playing the saints in the playoffs..
KidneyStoner420
Well-Known Member
Ok, now I'm definitely confused. You said Green Bay will do what Brady failed to do. Ok so Brady went 18-1 , which you claim is not what you are talking about. He's also won 3 Super Bowls. So please explain where green bay will succeed where brady failed.
I think you lost me for good on that one. You just keep back pedaling. Matter of fact, just pack pedal out of this thread why don't ya
I think you lost me for good on that one. You just keep back pedaling. Matter of fact, just pack pedal out of this thread why don't ya
growbuddy1
Active Member
I'll explain again little buddy, Brady had a winning season with NO super bowl win. That was in reference to that ONE year. Not Brady's entire career. Brady FAILED to win that super bowl, whereas I'm pretty confident the Packers are going to capitalize on their winning season. I'm not back pedaling, but you guys mix-match different posts to make yourself look better. I'm not going anywhere Especially when people bash the Packers that don't have a clue on how a great coach operates, and you being a Patriots fan, I can see why quality coaching never presented itself. You're coaches / players were caught cheating on top of playing there starters to get a silly undefeated season record, while it cost them a super bowl.
Do I need to explain it again?
Especially when people bash the Packers that don't have a clue on how a great coach operates, and you being a Patriots fan, I can see why quality coaching never presented itself. You're coaches / players were caught cheating on top of playing there starters to get a silly undefeated season record, while it cost them a super bowl. Do I need to explain it again?
growbuddy1
Active Member
Man would you guys learn how to read? I'm HAPPY about the lose even as a Packer fan, it sets us up for a better playoffs run, but for a KC fan to act like it was skill that one that game is absurd.
It's obvious half of you only watch ESPN's highlight reel and think you know football. I'd be willing to bet half of you haven't even watched a full Packers game this season; on top of that I'd be willing to bet most of you have never even stepped onto a football field.
I'll keep smiling while ya'll keep hating.
KidneyStoner420
Well-Known Member
LOL...I could pick 10s of seasons for teams where they had a winning record and lost the Super Bowl.
I still fail to see your point. In your case, I could call this season a fail compared to the Pats SB loss.
The Pats had an undefeated reg season, and Green bay FAILED to do that. They also FAILED to beat the Pats consecutive regular season win streak.
Again, what's your point?
Just go away already.
I dunno why I even bother replying. You're right, of course you're right, you're always right, right?
I still fail to see your point. In your case, I could call this season a fail compared to the Pats SB loss.
The Pats had an undefeated reg season, and Green bay FAILED to do that. They also FAILED to beat the Pats consecutive regular season win streak.
Again, what's your point?
Just go away already.
I dunno why I even bother replying. You're right, of course you're right, you're always right, right?
growbuddy1
Active Member
You're the one that started running your mouth about me saying the Packers were going to have a perfect season when I never even said it, you're the one creating drama based off a sloppy interpretation of something I said earlier. I'm just shutting you down. The point is you started shit, and I ended it.
I don't mind debating football and sports, but if you wanna come at me, at least have an intelligent thought to share. Everything I've said is based off of GREAT coaches from the past, what they've done, and how they've capitalized on winning seasons to win the super bowl.
That proves you don't know wtf you're talking about. Go watch some European Futbal dude and stop running your mouth in the Packer thread on shit you don't understand.
None of that matters if you don't win the super bowl... that just FURTHER proves how mis-guided you are on quality coaching. The point of the NFL is to win the superbowl. You've just spun this so far to make it look good for yourself, and your patriots, but in reality, it's just bad coaching and an uneducated fan.
I don't mind debating football and sports, but if you wanna come at me, at least have an intelligent thought to share. Everything I've said is based off of GREAT coaches from the past, what they've done, and how they've capitalized on winning seasons to win the super bowl.
Sunbiz1
Well-Known Member
You remind me of the many, many dull posters I have seen over the years on official sports message boards. I read your first 2 sentences and immediately lose interest in anything else you add.
The whine and cheese club is what I'm hearing from you.