US launches missile attack

ruby fruit

Well-Known Member
U mean they have no weapons of mass deception?
No just alluding to the fact theres no trophy human wise to go after unless its assad etc...i must confess tho im not well knowledgeable in the syrian matters im one of those ppl who are guilty of going out for a bong or beer when theres foreign matters relating to syria,egypt,palenstine etc
Maybe i just like watching the pacific sides of unrest ..i dunno
 

dannyboy602

Well-Known Member
No just alluding to the fact theres no trophy human wise to go after unless its assad etc...i must confess tho im not well knowledgeable in the syrian matters im one of those ppl who are guilty of going out for a bong or beer when theres foreign matters relating to syria,egypt,palenstine etc
Maybe i just like watching the pacific sides of unrest ..i dunno
i get my world news from uncle buck
 

Singlemalt

Well-Known Member
I find it interesting that a couple destroyers launch these missiles from that area while over in the fat kids province usa has over 100 ships ready to go...fat kids got no chance surely and he either knows it or is oblivious to it
Just hope china stays out of it but i cant see that
The fat kid is indeed crazy, shithouse rat crazy; he's not oblivious he just doesn't care
 

Heil Tweetler

Well-Known Member
Yes. Hell yes.

The tyrannical Syrian government is using chemical weapons against its own citizens, and our new POTUS isn't a pussy.

What did you think would happen?
more bone spurs?

fake news?

breitbart:

Alti
Sanfordbill3 hours ago


Trump has some explaining to do. This isn't what I voted for.


the breitbarters arent happy

 
Last edited:

Heil Tweetler

Well-Known Member
Guess the s400 AA missile system the Russians have isn't as good as the Russians want everyone to believe.
U.S. missiles did as little damage in Syria as possible, and Russia chose not to use S-400 defense

Donald Trump ordered the United States military to fire fifty or more powerful Tomahawk missiles into Syria tonight, creating visibly explosive fireworks in what looked on TV to be an overwhelming response to Bashar al-Assad’s chemical gas attack on his own people. But a closer examination reveals that the U.S. missiles inflicted minimal damage. And despite Russia’s built in ability to have blown those missiles out of the sky, it chose not to do so – suggesting this was all mere military theater.

The U.S. Tomahawk missiles used in the attack could have been struck down by the S-300 and S-400 surface-to-air weaponry which Russia already had in place in Syria, specifically to defend against this kind of attack (source: Washington Post). But Russia chose not to do so. That suggests Russia knew in advance that the U.S. missiles would not be imposing serious damage. Russia could only have known this if the U.S. told it as much in advance.
http://www.palmerreport.com/opinion/u-s-missiles-did-as-little-damage-in-syria-as-possible-and-russia-chose-not-to-shoot-them-down/2215/

 

ruby fruit

Well-Known Member
U.S. missiles did as little damage in Syria as possible, and Russia chose not to use S-400 defense

Donald Trump ordered the United States military to fire fifty or more powerful Tomahawk missiles into Syria tonight, creating visibly explosive fireworks in what looked on TV to be an overwhelming response to Bashar al-Assad’s chemical gas attack on his own people. But a closer examination reveals that the U.S. missiles inflicted minimal damage. And despite Russia’s built in ability to have blown those missiles out of the sky, it chose not to do so – suggesting this was all mere military theater.

The U.S. Tomahawk missiles used in the attack could have been struck down by the S-300 and S-400 surface-to-air weaponry which Russia already had in place in Syria, specifically to defend against this kind of attack (source: Washington Post). But Russia chose not to do so. That suggests Russia knew in advance that the U.S. missiles would not be imposing serious damage. Russia could only have known this if the U.S. told it as much in advance.
http://www.palmerreport.com/opinion/u-s-missiles-did-as-little-damage-in-syria-as-possible-and-russia-chose-not-to-shoot-them-down/2215/
usa chose to hit the airbase that launched the attacks on civilians...at $750 k a missile it was just petty money to them to stand up for the world that doesn't have the capabilitie usa has...Russia wouldn't intervene..how could they ? chemical weapons in the midst here if Russia stood up to the usa the world as a whole would turn on Russia for defending a country that used such weapons
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
usa chose to hit the airbase that launched the attacks on civilians...at $750 k a missile it was just petty money to them to stand up for the world that doesn't have the capabilitie usa has...Russia wouldn't intervene..how could they ? chemical weapons in the midst here if Russia stood up to the usa the world as a whole would turn on Russia for defending a country that used such weapons
Tomahawk missiles cost $1.5 million apiece. Still, $100 million is Chump change, pardon the pun. Watch their manufacturer's stock go up tomorrow.

Russia has cancelled the air strike coordination agreement, which raises the likelihood of our air forces getting tangled up a great deal. Things are getting far more dangerous.

While damage to runways is relatively minor, the loss of Syrian air assets is expensive and painful to the Assad regime, and by extension both Russian and Iranian interests.
Guess the s400 AA missile system the Russians have isn't as good as the Russians want everyone to believe.
Russian anti aircraft missile batteries are just that; anti aircraft. It's much more difficult to hit supersonic cruise missiles like the Tomahawk. They knew they would not be able to stop very many and didn't want to lose face trying and failing.

Palmer report likes to talk shit but does not have the advantage of experience with the weapon systems involved.
 

ruby fruit

Well-Known Member
aussie news media reports stated the tomahawks cost $ 745,000 a pop...not that it matters I don't wanna argue with ya the whole worlds on edge we might just be the straw that broke the camels back lol
 

Bareback

Well-Known Member
I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed, but I see this as a test to see how America would respond. To see if we would retaliate, fight amongst ourselves, look the other way, and I think it is a no win situation. Their is to many players involved , Syria is just a place for the powers that be the play games with out having to play on the home turf.

It is sad , them poor fuckers are just pawns in a world chess match.

:spew:
 

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed, but I see this as a test to see how America would respond. To see if we would retaliate, fight amongst ourselves, look the other way, and I think it is a no win situation. Their is to many players involved , Syria is just a place for the powers that be the play games with out having to play on the home turf.

It is sad , them poor fuckers are just pawns in a world chess match.

:spew:
Your avi is irrational.
 

chemphlegm

Well-Known Member
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/timeline-how-the-u-s-has-responded-to-syrias-civil-war/
March 2011:
Protests erupt in the city of Daraa over security forces’ detention of a group of boys accused of painting anti-government graffiti on the walls of their school. On March 15, a protest is held in Damascus’ Old City. On March 18, security forces open fire on a protest in Daraa, killing four people in what activists regard as the first deaths of the uprising. Demonstrations spread, as does the crackdown by President Bashar Assad’s forces.

April 2011: Security forces raid a sit-in in Syria’s third-largest city, Homs, where thousands of people tried to create the mood of Cairo’s Tahrir Square, the epicenter of protests against Egypt’s autocrat Hosni Mubarak.

Aug. 18, 2011: President Barack Obama calls on Assad to resign and orders Syrian government assets frozen.

Summer 2012: Fighting spreads to Aleppo, Syria’s largest city and its former commercial capital.

Aug. 20, 2012: Obama says the use of chemical weapons would be a “red line” that would change his calculus on intervening in the civil war and have “enormous consequences.”

March 19, 2013: The Syrian government and opposition trade accusations over a gas attack that killed some 26 people, including more than a dozen government soldiers, in the town of Khan al-Assal in northern Syria. A U.N. investigation later finds that sarin nerve gas was used, but does not identify a culprit.

Aug. 21, 2013: Hundreds of people suffocate in rebel-held suburbs of the Syrian capital, with many suffering from convulsions, pinpoint pupils, and foaming at the mouth. U.N. investigators visit the sites and determine that ground-to-ground missiles loaded with sarin were fired on civilian areas while residents slept. The U.S. and others blame the Syrian government, the only party to the conflict known to have sarin gas.

Aug. 31, 2013: Obama says he will go to Congress for authorization to carry out punitive strikes against the Syrian government, but appears to lack the necessary support in the legislature.

Sept. 27, 2013: The U.N. Security Council orders Syria to account for and destroy its chemical weapons stockpile, following a surprise agreement between Washington and Moscow, averting U.S. strikes. The Security Council threatens to authorize the use of force in the event of non-compliance.

Oct. 14, 2013: Syria becomes a signatory to the Chemical Weapons Convention, prohibiting it from producing, stockpiling or using chemical weapons.

READ MORE: Syria speeds up chemical weapon removal to meet June deadline

June 23, 2014: The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons says it has removed the last of the Syrian government’s chemical weapons. Syrian opposition officials maintain that the government’s stocks were not fully accounted for, and that it retained supplies.

Sept. 23, 2014: The U.S. launches airstrikes on Islamic State group targets in Syria.

READ MORE: U.S., Arab allies hit Islamic State strongholds in Syria, Iraq

Aug. 7, 2015: The U.N. Security Council authorizes the OPCW and U.N. investigators to probe reports of chemical weapons use in Syria, as reports circulate of repeated chlorine gas attacks by government forces against civilians in opposition-held areas. Chlorine gas, though not as toxic as nerve agents, can be classified as a chemical weapon depending on its use.

Aug. 24, 2016: The joint OPCW-U.N. panel determines the Syrian government twice used helicopters to deploy chlorine gas against its opponents, in civilian areas in the northern Idlib province. A later report holds the government responsible for a third attack. The attacks occurred in 2014 and 2015. The panel also finds that the Islamic State group used mustard gas.

Feb. 28, 2017: Russia, a stalwart ally of the Syrian government, and China veto a U.N. Security Council resolution authorizing sanctions against the Syrian government for chemical weapons use.

MORE: UN Ambassador Power warns against ‘historical amnesia’ in future Russian relations

April 4, 2017: At least 58 people are killed in what doctors say could be a nerve gas attack on the town of Khan Sheikhoun in the rebel-held Idlib province. Victims show signs of suffocation, convulsions, foaming at the mouth and pupil constriction. Witnesses say the attack was carried out by either Russian or Syrian Sukhoi jets. Moscow and Damascus deny responsibility.

MORE: What we know about the chemical weapon attack in Syria

April 4, 2017: President Donald Trump issues a statement saying that the “heinous” actions of Assad’s government are the direct result of Obama administration’s “weakness and irresolution.”

April 5, 2017: Trump says Assad’s government has “crossed a lot of lines” with the suspected chemical attack in Syria.

READ MORE: Trump threatens tougher approach toward Assad after chemical attack

April 6, 2017: The U.S. fired a barrage of cruise missiles into Syria Thursday night in retaliation for this week’s gruesome chemical weapons attack against civilians, U.S. officials said. It was the first direct American assault on the Syrian government and Trump’s most dramatic military order since becoming president. Trump said strike on Syria in the “vital national security interest” of the United States.
 

757growin

Well-Known Member
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/timeline-how-the-u-s-has-responded-to-syrias-civil-war/
March 2011:
Protests erupt in the city of Daraa over security forces’ detention of a group of boys accused of painting anti-government graffiti on the walls of their school. On March 15, a protest is held in Damascus’ Old City. On March 18, security forces open fire on a protest in Daraa, killing four people in what activists regard as the first deaths of the uprising. Demonstrations spread, as does the crackdown by President Bashar Assad’s forces.

April 2011: Security forces raid a sit-in in Syria’s third-largest city, Homs, where thousands of people tried to create the mood of Cairo’s Tahrir Square, the epicenter of protests against Egypt’s autocrat Hosni Mubarak.

Aug. 18, 2011: President Barack Obama calls on Assad to resign and orders Syrian government assets frozen.

Summer 2012: Fighting spreads to Aleppo, Syria’s largest city and its former commercial capital.

Aug. 20, 2012: Obama says the use of chemical weapons would be a “red line” that would change his calculus on intervening in the civil war and have “enormous consequences.”

March 19, 2013: The Syrian government and opposition trade accusations over a gas attack that killed some 26 people, including more than a dozen government soldiers, in the town of Khan al-Assal in northern Syria. A U.N. investigation later finds that sarin nerve gas was used, but does not identify a culprit.

Aug. 21, 2013: Hundreds of people suffocate in rebel-held suburbs of the Syrian capital, with many suffering from convulsions, pinpoint pupils, and foaming at the mouth. U.N. investigators visit the sites and determine that ground-to-ground missiles loaded with sarin were fired on civilian areas while residents slept. The U.S. and others blame the Syrian government, the only party to the conflict known to have sarin gas.

Aug. 31, 2013: Obama says he will go to Congress for authorization to carry out punitive strikes against the Syrian government, but appears to lack the necessary support in the legislature.

Sept. 27, 2013: The U.N. Security Council orders Syria to account for and destroy its chemical weapons stockpile, following a surprise agreement between Washington and Moscow, averting U.S. strikes. The Security Council threatens to authorize the use of force in the event of non-compliance.

Oct. 14, 2013: Syria becomes a signatory to the Chemical Weapons Convention, prohibiting it from producing, stockpiling or using chemical weapons.

READ MORE: Syria speeds up chemical weapon removal to meet June deadline

June 23, 2014: The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons says it has removed the last of the Syrian government’s chemical weapons. Syrian opposition officials maintain that the government’s stocks were not fully accounted for, and that it retained supplies.

Sept. 23, 2014: The U.S. launches airstrikes on Islamic State group targets in Syria.

READ MORE: U.S., Arab allies hit Islamic State strongholds in Syria, Iraq

Aug. 7, 2015: The U.N. Security Council authorizes the OPCW and U.N. investigators to probe reports of chemical weapons use in Syria, as reports circulate of repeated chlorine gas attacks by government forces against civilians in opposition-held areas. Chlorine gas, though not as toxic as nerve agents, can be classified as a chemical weapon depending on its use.

Aug. 24, 2016: The joint OPCW-U.N. panel determines the Syrian government twice used helicopters to deploy chlorine gas against its opponents, in civilian areas in the northern Idlib province. A later report holds the government responsible for a third attack. The attacks occurred in 2014 and 2015. The panel also finds that the Islamic State group used mustard gas.

Feb. 28, 2017: Russia, a stalwart ally of the Syrian government, and China veto a U.N. Security Council resolution authorizing sanctions against the Syrian government for chemical weapons use.

MORE: UN Ambassador Power warns against ‘historical amnesia’ in future Russian relations

April 4, 2017: At least 58 people are killed in what doctors say could be a nerve gas attack on the town of Khan Sheikhoun in the rebel-held Idlib province. Victims show signs of suffocation, convulsions, foaming at the mouth and pupil constriction. Witnesses say the attack was carried out by either Russian or Syrian Sukhoi jets. Moscow and Damascus deny responsibility.

MORE: What we know about the chemical weapon attack in Syria

April 4, 2017: President Donald Trump issues a statement saying that the “heinous” actions of Assad’s government are the direct result of Obama administration’s “weakness and irresolution.”

April 5, 2017: Trump says Assad’s government has “crossed a lot of lines” with the suspected chemical attack in Syria.

READ MORE: Trump threatens tougher approach toward Assad after chemical attack

April 6, 2017: The U.S. fired a barrage of cruise missiles into Syria Thursday night in retaliation for this week’s gruesome chemical weapons attack against civilians, U.S. officials said. It was the first direct American assault on the Syrian government and Trump’s most dramatic military order since becoming president. Trump said strike on Syria in the “vital national security interest” of the United States.
Yeah those 1/2 million dead syrians no bigly to the trumpf. But the 60 this week he couldnt stomach, was way to much! Or maybe its distraction from his corruption.
 
Top