US launches missile attack

ruby fruit

ruby fruit

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
Old numbers. More recent figures show steadily climbing cost.

How much the weapons cost is the least important part of the story.

Imagine what might happen if either Russia or America shoots down or even accidentally collides with someone from the other side.
Click to expand...
No need for an accident to happen...trump is inciting russia
 
mr sunshine

mr sunshine

Well-Known Member
ruby fruit said:
No need for an accident to happen...trump is inciting russia
Click to expand...
It was Russias idea bro, they're trying to create a diversion. It might have worked if trump would have kept his mouth shut. Guy comes out like"you see, I told you we weren't in cahoots with putin, you see? Did you guys see that? TOLD YOU".. putin probably beating his meat all hard right now, mad as fuck. The truth is always the opposite of whatever trumps saying.
 
|3E@Losetgreenz

|3E@Losetgreenz

Member
mr sunshine said:
It was Russias idea bro, they're trying to create a diversion. It might have worked if trump would have kept his mouth shut. Guy comes out like"you see, I told you we weren't in cahoots with putin, you see? Did you guys see that? TOLD YOU".. putin probably beating his meat all hard right now, mad as fuck. The truth is always the opposite of whatever trumps saying.
Click to expand...
e2983710db3ae81269d1c309635e0a4a.jpg
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
ruby fruit said:
No need for an accident to happen...trump is inciting russia
Click to expand...
So you're saying we shouldn't respond just because Putin might get mad?

If he wants to get angry about the US (ineffectually) bombing an airfield nowhere near him, let him.

Let Putin complain about someone retaliating against Assad for using sarin gas on civilians. It just makes him look worse.

Russian aircraft have been behaving in threatening ways to our own aircraft flying in international airspace for some time now. It's as if he wants to create an incident.

The question we should be asking is, 'why?'
 
Drowning-Man

Drowning-Man

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
So you're saying we shouldn't respond just because Putin might get mad?

If he wants to get angry about the US (ineffectually) bombing an airfield nowhere near him, let him.

Let Putin complain about someone retaliating against Assad for using sarin gas on civilians. It just makes him look worse.

Russian aircraft have been behaving in threatening ways to our own aircraft flying in international airspace for some time now. It's as if he wants to create an incident.

The question we should be asking is, 'why?'
Click to expand...
Funny that technicaly were allies with russia since the fall of thewall and they supposedly adopted democracy. But weve never trusted them since ww2 they havednt changed a bit. Cant turn your back on them for one second no one can and the whole world knows it no one trust them not even theyre allies.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Drowning-Man said:
Funny that technicaly were allies with russia since the fall of thewall and they supposedly adopted democracy. But weve never trusted them since ww2 they havednt changed a bit. Cant turn your back on them for one second no one can and the whole world knows it no one trust them not even theyre allies.
Click to expand...
Putin was a KGB thug who rose to rule the country.

Now he's a thug to everyone, including his own citizens and diplomatic staff, who have suddenly developed a habit of jumping out of 4th floor windows and shooting themselves in the head... Twice.

Why shouldn't we trust him?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top